Here's a 🧵summarizing my testimony on airborne transmission of COVID-19. Full version at edlabor.house.gov/hearings/clear… /0
COVID-19 is transmitted mainly by breathing in aerosol particles carrying the virus. Two other possible routes are 1) touching a sick person or contaminated object and 2) being sprayed by large respiratory droplets. These other routes are rarer. /1
Many cases of COVID-19 have been traced to “close contacts,” and this was incorrectly interpreted to mean that large droplets were responsible for transmitting the disease. /2
When people breathe, talk, sing, laugh, cough, or sneeze, they release far more aerosols than large droplets. These aerosols are most concentrated close to the sick person, and they don’t fall quickly to the ground. /3
When people talk in close proximity, it is much more likely that they will breathe in each other’s respiratory aerosols than shower each other with large droplets of spittle. /4
Aerosols remain floating in the air and follow air currents like cigarette smoke. Aerosols can easily travel more than 6 feet, filling a room and building up over time if the space does not have good ventilation. /5
Evidence for the importance of aerosol transmission includes superspreading events, transmission by people who are infected and don’t have symptoms (no coughing), much more indoor transmission and almost no outdoor transmission, various scientific studies. /6
If you spend a long time around other people indoors and do not wear a good mask, you could breathe in enough virus-containing aerosols to become sick with COVID-19. To limit exposure, avoid crowded indoor spaces and limiting time indoors with others. /7
If contact with others cannot be avoided (e.g., essential workers), it is critical to reduce exposure to virus in the air by ensuring good ventilation—this reduces the amount of virus in the air—and wearing high-performance masks or respirators. /8
A worker who spends 8-12 hours in a poorly ventilated workplace where they share the air with other people is at much greater risk for transmission than a customer who passes through the space for a short period of time. /9
Face coverings work in both directions. They reduce the amount of virus that an infected person spreads into the air = “source control.” They can also reduce the amount of virus that the wearer breathes in from the air around them. /10
Some types of face coverings are much more effective than others against aerosols. The performance of a face covering depends on the filtration efficiency of the material and the fit. /11
Cloth masks have wildly varying filtration efficiencies of <10% to >90%. The actual performance also depends on fit. Leaks seriously degrade performance. /12
Surgical masks are good at filtration efficiency because they’re made out of meltblown, non-woven polypropylene, but bad at fit. /13
Respirators are designed to be tight fitting and to filter out aerosols with very high efficiency. Examples include N95s, KN95s, KF94s, elastomeric respirators. /14
For workers and others in high-risk settings, the hierarchy of controls calls for control of source (i.e., masking), engineering controls (i.e., ventilation and filtration), and PPE (i.e., high-performance masks or respirators). /15
Most CDC guidance and recommendations have not been updated or strengthened to address and limit inhalation exposure to aerosols. CDC downplays aerosols and airborne transmission, a position that is exactly opposite the best scientific evidence. /16
CDC’s FAQ on “How does the virus spread?”, emphasizes close contact and says nothing about inhaling the virus. /17
The Scientific Brief “SARS-CoV-2 and Potential for Airborne transmission” obfuscates by incorrectly equating all transmission at close proximity with droplets. This is wrong because transmission in close contact is dominated by inhalation of aerosols. /18
Why the reluctance? 1) Incorrect understanding of aerosols, 2) “airborne” has special meaning in hospitals, 3) concerns about limited supplies of N95s. /19
CDC must update and strengthen its guidelines to fully address transmission via inhalation of aerosols at both close distances and farther away. /20
Most CDC guidance and recommendations continue to emphasize distancing and surface cleaning, which are important, but less important than using high-performance masks and sufficient ventilation to clean the air. /21
Our letter (drive.google.com/file/d/1O5zd_J…) calls for CDC and OSHA to issue recommendations and requirements that address transmission of COVID-19 by inhalation of aerosols. /22
Calling the virus “airborne” is the clearest way to convey how it is transmitted. /23
This testimony is based on my 12+ years of studying viruses in the air and 30+ scientific papers on the subject, along with many discussions with colleagues (next tweet). Thanks to @jljcolorado @kprather88 for providing feedback on my testimony. /24
At the risk of overlooking some, especially newer ones: @Don_Milton Yuguo Li, Julian Tang, Lidia Morawska @Lakdawala_Lab @j_g_allen @ShellyMBoulder @CorsIAQ @CathNoakes Lydia Bourouiba @ProfCharlesHaas and all my students and post-docs! /25

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Linsey Marr

Linsey Marr Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @linseymarr

5 Mar
We shouldn't be afraid to call SARS-CoV-2 "airborne." This is the clearest way to convey how it is transmitted. It's not waterborne, foodborne, bloodborne, or vector-borne. It's airborne. The word can still retain its special meaning in hospitals, like the word "chart." /1
A couple of updates to my 🧵from last year: I said there is no hard cutoff between droplets and aerosols. Well, there is a difference in how we are exposed: by large droplets being sprayed on us or by breathing in aerosols. /2
The associated size cut is in the range of 50-100 μm, depending on velocity of exhalation, local air flows, humidity, etc. The size cut is nowhere near the canonical 5 μm. /3
Read 4 tweets
24 Feb
I have no doubt that infection can happen via eyes and that large droplets can land there, but aerosols are unlikely to deposit there. If I assume 1 cm jet directed at eye, it must be 6000 mph for a 1 μm particle, 300 mph for 5 μm, 73 mph for 10 μm. /1
Aerosol scientists know that it's pretty hard to collect small aerosols by impaction; need very high velocities and tight geometry. This was for Stokes number=1. Someone should check my calcs. /2
I still recommend eye protection for close contact situations to avoid large droplet spray. And stop rubbing your eyes! /3
Read 4 tweets
29 Jan
I keep talking about HEPA filters as inserts for masks. How do you get one? I took inspiration from @SmartAirFilters (smartairfilters.com/en/blog/hepa-f…) and decided to get one and test it. My video here: TLDR: 2-ply >95% efficient. 🧵 /1
I picked up this HEPA filter from the HVAC filter aisle at the local big box store. It's pleated and comes in a frame, so you have to cut it out and pull off glue strips, as shown in the video in my first tweet. /2
How badly does the deconstruction process damage filtration efficiency? @isjinpan looked at three types of samples: 1) pristine, 2) spanning a crease, 3) under a glue strip that I pulled off. /3
Read 6 tweets
27 Jan
Glad to see CO2 in my classroom indicates excellent ventilation. My class has been meeting online, but this is good news for our potential to meet in person. Other classes met there yesterday, and ~20 people were there when I picked it up today. More for calcs... /1
We used a mass balance approach, although we actual did the calculations in terms of volume of CO2. /2
Y's are volumetric concentrations of CO2 /3
Read 5 tweets
26 Jan
I forgot my cloth mask today, so it was a good day to try a mask brace for my backup surgical-type mask. A 🧵on making it and my impressions of it. /1
I used the @fixthemask DIY mask brace V2.0. I printed the template, cut it out, and traced it on a rubber sheet, the recommended 1/32" Shore 40A material. /2
I cut it out carefully with scissors (thanks Twitter for the warning to trim smoothly to reduce the chance of tearing). The top loop goes around your head, the middle peak over your nose, and the bottom loop around your chin. /3
Read 6 tweets
18 Jan
Airborne Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: What We Know academic.oup.com/cid/advance-ar… Paper from our @theNASEM #EnviroHealthMatters workshop. Source-to-dose framework, like for particulate matter and health effects, and 4 critical questions: /1
Q1: What size particles are generated by people & how do they spread in air? A: Large range of sizes and concentrations, aerosols+droplets important at short range (<1.5 m), aerosols dominate exposure at longer range (>1.5 m). /2
Q2: Which size particles are infectious and for how long? A: <5 μm and probably larger, half-life is around 1 hr /3
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!