One of Britain’s most critically acclaimed news-comedy shows - The Mash Report - is to be axed as part of the new post-Brexit emphasis on more “patriotic & Conservative television”.
2/
The new BBC director Tim Davie - a prominent Conservative supporter of Boris Johnson - has been tasked with a radical overhaul of BBC comedy programming which has been perceived as too left wing & not pro Brexit.
3/
The Mash Report was publicly identified as one of the early targets for cancellation by Boris Johnson’s “anti-woke unit” as it was highly popular with a younger demographic who tend not to get their news via either official news channels nor Govt friendly press.
4/
Comedy was identified by the govt as crucial to institutionalising a more conservative “Brexit-patriotic” British culture as it was seen as landing more consistent criticism of govt actions than the more “tightly managed” news shows on UK TV.
5/
Ironically what may have confirmed The Mash Report’s cancellation was it’s very success.
Clips going viral is basically the Holy Grail of modern TV & media and TMR was one of the most successful BBC programs for this - ensuring that its jokes & sketches has a long afterlife.
6/
The attack on comedy that the head of the BBC is tasked with is particularly aimed at under 40s who - are not only high consumers of this - are also unlike other genres such as news, quite prominent performers & managers.
It’s to reshape, not just BBC, but a whole Industry.
7/
UK govt anti-woke unit tasked with encouraging a more Brexit-patriotic culture also seen as vital to protect the Union.
The perceived leftwing culture at BBC was seen as anti-Union & anti British Empire.
Davie is to introduce more “British themed” programmes to combat this.
8/
As I’ve remarked upon before the anti-woke strategy is aimed principally at the you g who are seen as untrustworthy for a number of reasons:
1. High graduate count 2. More internationalist 3. Less reliant on traditional media
UK govt worried young less accepting of Brexit.
9/
For those saying I’ve made this up..even the Telegraph reporting on this now:
10/
This is what I was talking about earlier on the viral nature of The Mash Report’s clips:
Uniquely & unprecedentedly for a BBC political comedy show, the Mash Report produced clips that went not just a “million times” viral - but a 100million+ times level viral.
So it was cancelled.
12/
Last post on this thread I’ll leave with Nish.
Dedicated to those who said I made this up...6 hours before the story hit all the major press, then said TMR, one of the most viral shows in British TV history, cancelled as it was unpopular.
Once again some people are being very illogical about PR and the Labour party.
So ask yourself:
“what is the best way to get PR into the U.K. political system?”
The answer is of course….
The best (& only plausible) way is:
1. Labour/LibDem coalition 2. People who want PR joining the Labour Party
So if you are saying you won’t vote Labour until it’s guaranteed PR before the debate/coalition/election is sorted you’re sabotaging the only way this can be achieved.
I want PR.
Thus I want as many people who also want PR to join the Labour Party.
This shouldn’t need explaining.
Again.
It’s literally how politics works.
The LibDems are even more pro PR than labour so a coalition with them increases its lobby power.
In 10 years time people on both sides of the current “debate” are going to be very sheepish about how they turned a complex evolving subject into a nuance-fee bloodlust culture war.
Due to my family I spend 3 months of the year in an Asian country with a long history of trans people & culture.
The contrast between how this subject is treated there and in the UK is staggering.
I always think it would be beneficial for westerners who’ve now “discovered” trans issues and have gone full culture war inside weeks to spend a bit of time in Thai/Lao culture.
It’s what is called “performative nastiness” - a concept dating from 1930s.
The point is not necessarily just a bad policy but to encourage the population to “enjoy” the performative element, to encourage complicity.
Whether the policy has any practical merit isn’t important.
Students of fascism will recognize “performative nastiness” but many people won’t get it at first.
The thrill is in the “transgression”. The enjoyment of being encouraged to be complicit in what was formerly understood to be things that are “considered wrong” or “taboo”.
Priti Patel has recieved £100,000 one of the largest single donations by an oil trader - Pierre Andurand - who is not made any donations to British political parties before nor to have shown any previous interest in UK politics.
Pierre Andurand made some of his biggest profits betting on the effects of Covid-19 pandemic and predicting a world oil price slump.
He then reversed this decision prior to the Russian invasion.
Andurand has close personal ties with Russia through both his former & ex wives.
Indeed Andurand got special permission to marry his previous wife - Yevgenia Slyusarenko - in a lavish ceremony in St. Petersburg at one of Catherine I Russia’s former palaces.
Use of Lebedev family residences by Boris Johnson “much greater than previously known”.
Total time spent by the prime minister & former foreign secretary at these homes now thought to run “into months” not days.
All time spent there without security detail or sweeps.
The use of Lebedev’s multiple homes in Italy and UK supplied by the Putin-near former KGB officer Alexander Lebedev is now known to have been - contrary to earlier reports - regular events with Johnson taking the time to visit Italy alone on at least 5-10 occasions.
While on some occasions parties were involved this was not the case every time. In some cases a much smaller more group attended.
Johnson was transported on several occasions via Alexander Lebedev’s private jet.
The same jet the Lebedev family use for their business in Russia.