Sarah Everard / Reclaim These Streets vigil: We're waiting at the High Court to see if the organisers' challenge to the Met Police's ban on tomorrow's event, under Covid regulations, will lead to a full hearing in court.
The challenge could be dealt with "on the papers" - so a judge reads the case for and against and gives their view. It could be a full hearing in open court. Or it could be resolved out of court, if Scotland Yard were to change its mind.
The issue for a judge looks simple: Do police have the power to ban the vigil in south London, under the Covid regulations? But it's more complicated than that.
The lockdown law says we need a "reasonable excuse" to leave home. But there's no fixed list as to what's a reasonable excuse. The law gives examples of reasons to leave home - but they're not exclusive. You could come up with others.
And on top of that, it's silent on whether "public protest" is, or is not, a reasonable excuse to leave home.
That's why @ReclaimTS and their team say the Met must rethink the ban and consider the legal *right* that people have to make their voices heard, in remembering Ms Everard and the many, many other women who are victims of violence.
Those rights to free speech and assembly, enshrined in the Human Rights Act, are not a trump card. But the police must always show they have considered them, when looking at whether it's strictly necessary to restrict a demonstration.
But it doesn't end there ! (Sorry had to go and take some calls)

Just suppose you're confident you have a reasonable excuse to leave home. There's the separate question of "participation in gatherings"...
Under the lockdown, outdoor gatherings are banned - although there are some clear exceptions because of the necessities of daily life.
But the ban arguably conflicts with the law's examples of reasonable excuses to leave home - such as the right to take part in industrial action
And there's an additional issue for organisers of a gathering. They face £10k fines.
(Conclusion: It's 3D Space Chess - and then some - and I can't fit it all into 90 seconds on air.)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dominic Casciani

Dominic Casciani Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BBCDomC

12 Mar
Judgment coming NOW in the challenge against the Metropolitan Police's ban imposed on the Sarah Everard vigil #reclaimthesestreets
Mr Justice Holgate: This vigil is being organised following the tragic death of Sarah Everard. It's being organised at Clapham Common. Their objective is to hold a vigil safely and lawfully particularly in the context of the pandemic. Two of the claimants are local councillors.
Mr Justice Holgate: The event the court understands is supported by Lambeth Council, the local authority. The initial engagement with the police appeared to be positive and there was a plan to meet yesterday to work out how to hold the vigil safely.
Read 10 tweets
12 Mar
Ok ... legal challenge to the Met Police's ban on the Reclaim These Streets / Sarah Everard vigil is now beginning. Tom Hickman QC will be making the firest submissions for the organisers of tomorrow's proposed event.
Mr Justice Holgate begins by saying that he and all others taking part in the hearing express their sympathies to the family of Sarah Everard.
The submissions re the ban on the vigil are going to take about an hour. Tom Hickman QC says the proposed event is a vigil and a protest. It would be socially-distanced.
Read 23 tweets
4 Jan
BREAKING: British judge REFUSES to approve Julian Assange's extradition to the USA because of his severe mental health problems and likely suicide.
District Judge Vanessa Baraitser rules that while US prosecutors met the tests for Mr Assange to be extradited for trial, the US is incapable of preventing him from attempting to take his own life - and therefore extradition would be oppressive.
Court reconvening after 1130 to discuss what happens next. US is planning to appeal. Assange's team want him freed on bail.
Read 5 tweets
4 Jan
Julian Assange judgment now full swing - some difficulties with the virtual link now resolved. District Judge Vanessa Baraitser at the Old Bailey is giving her decision on the US extradition request. Outlining evidence of his self harm and suicidal thoughts. #AssangeExtradition
DJ Baraitser says half a razor blade was once found in his cell. "The overall impression is of a depressed and sometimes despairing man fearful for his future."
If convicted in the US, Mr Assange could be placed in special supermax prison measures - basically near total solitary confinement with exceptional limits on social interaction with prison guards.
Read 4 tweets
17 Dec 20
Less than 350 HOURS now from full-flavour Brexit. Here are the facts about how the UK will crash out of a host of security, criminal justice and crime-fighting tools keeping you safe. Police will lose lose many of these even if there is a deal: bbc.co.uk/news/explainer…
The UK will be ejected from the European Arrest Warrant (although it does have its critics); it will have a totally unclear relationship with Europol and its joined-up cross-border organised crime investigations.
SIS 2 - jargon name for a massively important database providing millions of insta-alerts to frontline policing and border security: Criminal on the run in Europe? Possibly in the UK? SIS 2 sends the alert. Home Office has no choice but to unplug the UK's connection.
Read 12 tweets
11 Nov 20
There is a livestream of the undercover policing inquiry here - but it is virtually unusable for reporters trying to follow it remotely. The words are appearing via a fast scrolling video feed that can't be paused or rewound: ucpi.org.uk/hearing/eviden…
1) I can't type that fast to copy down everything. If I could hear the audio - which we are not allowed to do - I could take down quotes in shorthand.
2) We cannot scroll back to check quotes. 20 years ago at the Bloody Sunday Inquiry, we could do that.
3) If I were to screen-shot key quotes (to transcribe for a report) I would then miss the next five minutes. And given I can't hear the evidence, I can't say whether we would miss something important.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!