1/8 The #HateCrimeBill has been approved by Holyrood. There is still a chance a Judicial Review may find it discriminatory, but for now its passage into law seems assured. So what light might ScotGov’s Equality Impact Assessment on the Bill shed on how it happened?
2/8 Existing ‘hate crime’ statutory aggravations already included: race; religion; disability; sexual orientation & transgender. The EIA says ScotGov accepted all of Lord Bracadale’s recommendations about a new bill, except he said ‘sex’ should be included. It’s not. They didn’t
3/8ScotGov said “Hate Crime legislation... sends a message to victims, perpetrators & wider society that hate crime is not acceptable & will not be tolerated”. It’s just a different message about misogynistic hate crime.
4/8 The EIA says ScotGov “found that none of the proposals are discriminatory...the Bill will have a positive equality impact” The section on sex says only that there is no direct or indirect discrimination under the Equality Act. No consideration of any issues & no explanation.
5/8 91% of responses to the EIA were from individuals but their opinions have been disregarded where they differed from the 4/5 main groups ScotGov fund, consulted with over & over & who agreed with them. Wider organisations had a broader range of opinion - largely ignored.
6/8 One of the favoured groups Engender Scotland, do not consult anyone, not even their own members, but the opinions of their 10 staff & 12 Board members are cited over & over by ScotGov.
7/8 Engender, Rape Crisis & Women’s Aid have not explained how including sex in the HC Bill would have led to ‘a failure to deal effectively with violence against women & girls’ but not have had the same failure in relation to other groups
8/8 The EIA notes that the majority of individuals did not support Hate Crime Laws at all, mostly out of concern for the impact on freedom of expression & the creation of a hierarchy of victims. Hello you 1,000+ people! How does it feel to know your views don’t matter?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rhona Hotchkiss

Rhona Hotchkiss Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HotchkissRhona

10 Jan
1/9 A thread of testimony submitted by experts in psychiatry, paediatrics & cognitive neuroscience from around the world to the High Court in the Tavistock Puberty Blockers case.
2/9 One expert said it had been left to those coming to the end of their careers to speak out because the atmosphere of hostility & intimidation facing critical voices made it impossible for younger people to do so
3/9 A global expert on autism reported that girls with autism or anorexia were much more likely to say they wanted to become boys; all young people with difficult childhoods were more likely to say they wanted to transition
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!