In case we’re tempted to think that the “empathy is sin” mindset is a fringe thing for evangelicals, let me connect some dots based on my experience.
I’ve got the names of an individual and an institution for us. John Piper, and Bethlehem College & Seminary. 1/
Let’s start with the institution. I attended @BCS_MN’s M.Div program from 2016-2020. In 2019, yes, I heard BCS’s president-elect Joe Rigney say that “empathy is sin.” But I also heard the same thing from at least one other BCS prof on several occasions, with *no* qualifiers. 2/
Some profs like Rigney were willing to die on that hill. But too, when I raised concerns about this “empathy as sin” doctrine to other BCS profs, they shrugged it off. They neither confirmed, nor denied the sin. But...they were clearly afraid to say that empathy *wasn’t* sin. 3/
The upshot of this is that essentially every male M.Div student at BCS will go through the program with a side eye at empathy. If they didn’t take the hard position (and I watched as many cohort mates did), they often succumbed to silence and bought the teaching implicitly. 4/
Side note: I can’t imagine who needs empathy more than a bunch of white, type-A, high-achieving, Reformed, complementarian males training to be pastors all over the world.
But of course the sickness of the system is that those who need empathy most have no room for it. 5/
But, what does this all have to do with Piper, you ask? Besides Piper’s obvious ties to Doug Wilson—ties which Rigney shares big time—there’s this full-throated endorsement of Rigney and his ability to “see through cultural smoke.” Sounds like code words, eh? 6/
Piper’s aware of Rigney’s 2019 video and the positions of the profs at his school. There’s no way he can’t be! And he’s offering his hearty thankfulness and welcome to Rigney—no qualifiers. 7/
The playbook will be that these men are being “misunderstood,” or “slandered” re: their positions on empathy. They’ll offer “clarifications,” b/c that’s what they do. But they won’t offer apologies or retractions. Again this is part of the pathology of their environment. 8/
And speaking of the environment, what about those seminarians and their wives and families who are looking to Piper, Rigney, and others to lead the way and “see through the cultural smoke”? What about the churches, both domestic and foreign, that these seminarians will plant? 9/
What about the hundreds of families and thousands of people that will sit under the ministries of men who sat under BCS’s influence?
This “empathy as sin” crap is a huge problem. And no, it’s not fringe. 10/
He says: If I have so many negative things to say about BCS, why did I go there in the first place? If I don’t like John Piper’s theology, why did I sit under it for four years?
The short answer is that going into seminary I was incredibly naive. 🧵
As a teenager, I found myself wanting more out of God, frankly. The G/god that I’d encountered in my church was authoritarian and tribal. And that left a vacuum in my soul. Then I discovered Piper’s sermons, etc., and I was immediately drawn to the “bigness” of Piper’s vision.
After college, I knew I wanted to go to seminary. I was leaning toward Calvinist theology, and I held vaguely complementarian views from my growing up years. I had gleaned from Piper here and there, and my wife was from MN, and things came together so that I could attend BCS.
I’ve said several things about @BCS_MN recently on Twitter. And yet, I still have so many memories and thoughts. And I’m still processing through some of the hurt.
In one thread, I claimed that BCS has a toxic, “power through fear” culture. 1/
In another, I claimed that the faculty/admins were complicit in this culture (i.e., the problem isn’t an individual; it’s the institution). In this thread, I want to give substance to those claims. 2/
I want to do that by recounting some of my experiences in class with a specific prof, and by underlining how the Deans at BCS responded when I brought these troubling experiences to light. 3/
It’s your weekly sermon-prep live tweet from yours truly! Working through Mt 1-4 leading up to Palm Sun. Mt 2:1-23 this week.
Last wk we summed up the chiasmic 1:1-25 with “Jesus is the King we’ve all been waiting for.”
(Disclaimer: no chiasms in 2:1-23 that I can discern. 🤷🏻♂️)
The main point of 2:1-23 will be “God is getting ready to launch his kingdom through King Jesus.”
Outline?
We see God 1. Proclaim his King (v. 1-12) 2. Protect his King (v. 13-18) 3. Preserve his King (v. 19-24)
Anyone have a better p-word than “preserve” for v. 19-24? 😂
Two scattered insights from the text:
(1) Herod is fearful, then angry, then violent in this story. This is significant. I think we can say that hate often (always?) lies behind violence, and fear often (always?) lies behind that hate.
I always used to stumble over passages in the Psalms that talked about “enemies” or “foes.” For example, I didn’t know what to do when David says something like “God, consider how many are my foes, and with what violent hatred they hate me” in Psalm 25:19. 1/
Those texts (and let’s be honest, there’s a lot of them in the Psalter) just never seemed to apply to me. David literally has soldiers and enemies chasing him over mountains and into caves, to kill him! I don’t have anything remotely close to that, I would always think. 2/
Sure, I had disagreements with people, but I don’t have human “enemies.” And my problems were relatively invisible and insignificant compared to what David was going through.
It was an epiphany to realize that not only did God give the psalms to David for his struggles, 3/
I’ve been thinking. A few people at least have accused me of slandering @BCS_MN via Twitter. So here are some thoughts re: claims of “slander,” and re: a thoroughly inadequate institutional response on the part of BCS over the past years. 1/
Overall I had a terrible experience over four years at BCS. It climaxed in April 2020 in a confrontation with a prof in a Zoom classroom, in front of my cohort. At the end of this confrontation (which I had tried to de-escalate, and which my prof had insisted on escalating), 2/
This prof had told me that my opinions and words were “sinful to the core,” and that I needed to “stop blaming others” for the escalation in class, that I needed to “reach out to him” with an apology later, because he sure as heck wasn’t going to reach out to me to reconcile. 3/
So far this culture of silence and “loyalty” at BCS has stifled anything resembling scandal. But the school cannot suppress its toxicity forever. @reachjulieroys, watch for something ugly to break open at Bethlehem College & Seminary in the coming years.
More could be said. But I may have said enough here to later get threatened with a lawsuit myself! The bottom line is, stay far away from @BCS_MN. Thank you @KyleJamesHoward for speaking up about BCS. And thank you @scotmcknight and @laurambarringer for writing this book.
To finish up, my words here are not about Piper (I actually respect him, to some extent). It’s not about Calvinism (I’d still steer Calvinists away from BCS. Go to...somewhere else. TEDS? Haha) It’s about people, truth-telling, and doing what’s right. BCS has failed in all three.