I’m writing this series that explains the “Big History” behind January 6th — and the real story spans decades. Here’s what happened, and why—and importantly, how we might keep it from happening again. This is Part 1 of 6. More soon!
🚨 And... here is the beast at the center of it all. Part five of my six part series on the "Big History" behind January 6th: Molestation, Cancel Culture, QAnon, and the man that connects "I AM" theosophy and the Koch family. davetroy.medium.com/the-big-histor…
And... part six, the stunning conclusion. With a coda coming soon, talking about what we might expect to see next.
1/Based on information from our sources, we have now compiled a list of 410 known Dialog participants spanning the last ~15 years. This is by far the most complete list. docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d…
2/It also underscores another point: Dialog is large, and not particularly secret. Invitations (such as the one seen in the Epstein files) include long lists of participants and are sent without expectation of secrecy. Indeed, this is how we have been able to build this list.
3/The thing that has been keeping Dialog's participant list hidden is inertia and overall lack of interest — until now. Had anybody cared to research this, it would not have been difficult to do so. While the new leak cited by WIRED has added some new knowledge of their processes, Dialog's participant list has never been a closely guarded secret — indeed, they sent it to every new prospect. But it wasn't widely shared or posted publicly, either.
One of the main things people are getting wrong about the “Dialog” group (and there are several misconceptions) is that it was Thiel’s only or most important convening. “Hereticon” is where things get much stranger; it’s a tiered network.
You’ll recognize names from the Dialog network, as well as a healthy dose of UFO promoters and Founders Fund portfolio companies. Dialog (scouting), retreats (recruitment), Hereticon (sanctum sanctorum) — students of cult dynamics will recognize that this is How to Build a Cult.
1/I know it seems hard to believe, but ~70% of the American public is fed up with all of this and just wants to have a job, raise their kids, and be able to retire.
All of the trouble is coming from the wingnuts on both sides.
2/Facts: 1. Only 50% of people vote in midterms. 2. Only 66% of people vote in presidential years. 2. >45% of voters identify as independent (and rising).
So with only about 58% of people voting, and about half of them being Independent, that's around 30% who identify as Democratic or Republican.
3/Of that 30% who are party-affiliated and who vote, we are roughly evenly divided (on average) — so around 15% per party. Not all of those are happy with their party.
So while it's popular to say that "one half the country hates the other half," the math simply doesn't hold up.
The reality is that 70% of the country is exhausted by the drama being caused by the other 30%.
These are the DSA geniuses that built Platner in a lab but failed to observe his Nazi tendencies and misogynistic worldview. Professional malpractice, and these two should not be allowed within a hundred mile radius of a Democratic race ever again.
At this point the most likely outcome is that Platner wins by a few points, then Dems have to carry him to term to November, where he will be pronounced dead; cause of death: Susan Collins and a modest ad budget. RIP. 🪦
Meanwhile they’re trying to take down Talarico and keep finding he’s had normal, respectful relationships with cute women. If you want to do him a solid, vote for Janet Mills and not Platner, because GOP snakes will try to smear Talarico with Platner’s sins.
1/Not sure who needs to hear it but the Oslo Freedom Forum and its parent org Human Rights Foundation is a hive of antidemocratic Libertarian ideologues and goldbug/crypto zealots laundering their extreme positions through human rights activists.
2/Founded with funding from Peter Thiel, the group’s chair Kasparov lets his name be used to legitimize the organization with mainstream liberals, with whom he has cultivated an audience. He has disowned Thiel since then, but his imprint remains.
3/Meet Justin Moon, who is “going to live like a redneck until the FED [sic] collapses,” referring to the longtime fetish of Ron Paul / Thomas Massie acolytes of “Ending the Fed.” And he’s using AI to 10x “activists” (i.e. crypto supporters.)
We have a real problem brewing with the “Board of Peace” and it needs much more attention.
1) There is no legal entity for “Board of Peace” organized under the laws of any country, meaning it is subject to NO country’s laws.
2) Trump is acting like the US is party to it as a treaty organization, but only Congress has the power to do approve that.
3) BoP is collecting and distributing funds (JP Morgan playing as banker) but this must be in violation of Know-Your-Customer laws since BoP *doesn’t exist*. It is a transnational mafia backed only by the executive power of its members.
4) Since BoP doesn’t exist, USPTO is illegally holding its trademarks on its behalf, violating the Lanham Act, which requires that holders intend to use marks in commerce.
5) Trump signed Executive Order 14375 protecting BoP under the International Organizations Immunity Act, but this merely protects from interference, it does not legitimize or establish the organization.
6) Trump is saying he intends to use it to “oversee” the United Nations. There is no provision in the UN charter for any such oversight organization; what he means is that he is going to extort the UN by withholding US dues.
This thing needs to be challenged legally and practically. If it is not stopped it will quickly evolve into a world takeover mechanism, and indeed it is already usurping US sovereignty as well as sovereignty in Gaza and of participant countries.
Seriously, this is no joke and intervention is necessary NOW. The illegal trademarks are one pathway in. There are others. But whatever you do don’t brush this off as one of Trump’s follies. It’s anything but.
More on the Board of Peace’s illegal trademarks. Satirical T-shirts, anyone?
One can make an argument that BoP derived an “international character” from the UN resolution, which may provide some capacity for its banking activities. This still doesn’t resolve the trademark or appropriations issues, which are explicitly in violation of US law. Needs sunlight!