Been thinking about the monastic life.
Monks and nuns throughout the ages have deliberately aimed for a lifestyle many would recognize as our pandemic lifestyle: boring, predictable, with a few close people or alone.
What can their choices tell us about our lives now?
Thread 1/
After a year in pandemic world, we see articles like this that frame the pandemic as having very negative effects on our minds. The article quotes a neuroscientist saying "We’re all walking around with some mild cognitive impairment" - are we? 2/
The Desert Fathers and Mothers, the earliest monks and nuns, deliberately chose a life of isolation (either by themselves or with a few close people), conveniently close enough to a river, a city, but still, predictable, boring, not fun, why did they choose lives like that? 3/
The reasons for this are complex. Part of it has to do with the fact that early Christians wanted to move away from the world and its many distractions, also the route of martyrdom was not open anymore as Xianity became the de facto state religion of the Roman Empire 4/
But also, interestingly, monks and nuns throughout history have believed that a lifestyle we now would recognize has a lot in common with pandemic sheltering (with a few close people or alone, boring, predictable, work) would provide spiritual clarity 5/
They believed that the monastic lifestyle would open up our minds and souls to become closer to God. You see this in for instance St Teresa of Avila's Interior Castle, where she likens the soul to layers of inner mansions 6/ sacred-texts.com/chr/tic/index.…
She responds to the objection that "if this castle is the soul, clearly no one can have to enter it, for it is the person himself: one might as well tell some one to go into a room he is already in!" as follows "There are, however, very different ways of being in this castle" 7/
The contemplative life, in Theresa's view, creates the possibility of clarity but many do not reach it. They only reach the outer mansions of the castle of their souls. But with deep contemplation, it becomes possible to reach the inner mansions. 8/
Similarly, Gregory of Nyssa's apophatic mysticism likens the soul to a mirror. Our souls are like a mirror reflecting God's beauty and splendor. When the bad effects of original sin, which mar our divine image are restored, we can reflect God again. 9/
The human soul/mirror of God can only convey an image of its original only as and when it is “looking to” its original. Contemplation then, by focusing our minds on God and away from worldly affairs, helps to restore the divine image in us (commentary on Song of Songs) 10/
The contemplative, monastic life creates the conditions for the soul to become clear, like a shining mirror, purified from the muddle of social expectations and worldly attractions. This is quite different from the very negative experience that sheltering-in-place provides 11/
I've been thinking of these contrasting images--of brain fog and cognitive impairment and of clarity and cognitive enrichment--that the Atlantic article presents and that medieval mystics present to us. Under what conditions can boredom and isolation provide clarity? 12/
A huge difference is probably that many (not all!) monks and nuns who chose the monastic lifestyle did so voluntarily whereas sheltering-in-place is either state mandated or done because one wants to protect health and health of loved ones 13/
And we mustn't forget that indeed that threat is real: so many people with long covid, so many people who lost loved ones, the huge burdens when we do venture out (masking, social distancing etc) that all makes a huge difference 14/
But in spite of all of that, in spite of the fact sheltering-in-place in a pandemic isn't voluntarily, that the monastic clarity is something we've glimpsed. I'm still struggling to articulate this clarity. 15/
Take the social look of others, which philosophers such as Sartre, Fanon, De Beavoir discuss as "le regard"- the social expectations that demand of us to be a certain way. When it is diminished/falls away, what happens? 16/
People, especially women, have taken to: not wearing makeup, not wearing uncomfortable pants, not wearing heals, not dyeing hair to mask grey. Deodorant sales have plummeted. There is a kind of freedom in not being told to smile. 17/
There is a kind of alienation toward our previous lives. Anyway, maybe I'm just trying to make lemonade with the lemons I'm having now (acknowledging my privilege as a middle-class person!), but there are those moments of clarity and contemplation this past year I've had 18/
...that I haven't had before. My kids have been schooling at home for a year, I've had a lot of service work etc so it is not a calm bed of roses. Still the boredom of this strange existence made me think of anchorites, hermits and monks, and the clarity they were seeking /end
Thank you to @SaraLUckelman and @RebeccaBamford for helping me further think about this issue. It's complex and difficult!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
About a year into this pandemic, I'm craving physical, embodied experiences. So I'll occasionally put a photo that's in my photo library that I took, for enjoyment. This is a wonderful watercolor by JRR Tolkien, taken in Oxford when I lived there (in 2016).
Me in the Musée d'art contemporain in Montreal in 2016
Watching a Sanderson video on how to publish your novel. S. says how it used to be publishers would also publish "mid-listers", books that had a steady fan base but not bestsellers. Now, the big publishers just want bestsellers. Why? 1/
Sanderson says that that it's because of indy publishing. If you can self-publish and have a fan base you'll be better off than if you're mid-listing at a big publisher. But I'm not so sure. It seems to me this is really driven by the publishing world. 2/
Another thing that's remarkable is how the shifting/slush reading is now done by agents and basically you can't (already for a while) send directly to big publishers. So you get all these middle-people where no middle-person used to exist (cf also real estate etc). 3/
@travisthewriter@mehdirhasan Ah that's a pity! I think Arendt works very well for intro phil course. She sought to understand how ordinary, decent people could enable something like the Nazis. I mean, people who voted for Nazis were people w families etc. not psychopaths, law-abiding citizens. So why?
@travisthewriter@mehdirhasan Arendt also focused on stalinism. To her, Nazism and stalinism (in her Origins of Totalitarianism) were similar in that respect that they are totalitarian regimes enabled by a mass of people 2/
@travisthewriter@mehdirhasan A key term for her is a "mass", a mass is when people are fractured, isolated, the social fabric is destroyed to such an extent they can't organize themselves according to common or public interest 3/
I keep on seeing these calls that it's time to "heal our country", "heal our divisions". I see those calls now after the storming of the Capitol, and I saw them after the Brexit vote.
Christian philosophy can help us understand why this doesn't work. (small thread) 1/
The concept that I think is going to be very useful in helping us understand why we can't just call for healing is the concept of atonement. Here I draw on recent discussion in an excellent book by my colleague Eleonore Stump global.oup.com/academic/produ… 2/
As Eleonore Stump (2018, 7) has remarked, the word “atonement” does not mean repentance, though it has acquired this meaning over time. It literally means “at-onement,” the making whole of what is separate, the healing of a relationship that has been damaged. 3/
Little thread on the "We'll be fine, it will be my turn soon" narrative. When I express frustration and the snail pace of vaccine rollout, people will often say "I am fine, I'll be happy to let HCW, the vulnerable etc go first". Some reasons why I resist this narrative 1/
First, it is not at all clear that we are fine. We, as a society, are not fine. We have tried to make the best of it, but it's clear that the roll in human lives, economy, happiness and flourishing, mental health etc is huge and this will only stop when the pandemic ends 2/
So why have we grown all complacent so close to the finish line? Why should we accept that although states and countries have had *months and months* to plan this fall so behind their own targets? I mean, the fact that vaccines are coming wasn't exactly a surprise! 3/
Some philosophers whose work I read in 2020 that I didn't really know before
Wang Yangming (1472–1529), neo-Confucian Chinese philosopher and general
Jane Addams (1860-1935), American social reformer and pragmatist
Pyotr Kropotkin (1842-1921), Russian anarchist. 1/
I think an interesting thread that unites all of them, though they lived and worked in different times and places, is the notion that we are all interconnected and interdependent. It's such an important insight, as we are all experiencing now 2/
And yet, most western societies do not have the notion of interdependence in what Mary Midgley would call their "philosophical plumbing". Western societies still have the weird belief that technology alone (vaccines, green tech etc) will bail us out of any problems 3/