Two weeks after our 13-y-o started feeling crummy, some guidance & reflections on quarantining with a teenager diagnosed with covid-19.
It started as a minor headache on Feb. 28, three days after her middle school re-opened. She felt worse at school the next day and skipped gymnastics in the afternoon. We got her a rapid test. It was positive.
Mobilizing to care for her while shielding big sister, little sister and my wife, got some mixed msgs. Pediatrician and our primary care doc gave different instructions. We sided with the more conservative 14 days of isolation for her and 10 days quarantine for the other gals.
I was exempt from quarantine, as I was two weeks past my second Moderna shot, and I became the point person to care for our covid patient. My wife moved downstairs, lil sis moved out of her shared room with patient into our room & we all decamped to the downstairs bathroom.
The 13-y-o had headache, fever, chills and cough in the first few days; symptoms mostly subsided by day 5 and she just had some congestion for the next few days. She read a bunch of books and watched Netflix & we Zoomed her in on family dinners. I brought treats outside her door.
Happily, and against the odds, we were able to keep everyone else from getting sick. The eldest was able to take her SAT this past weekend as planned and now everybody is back in school.
My takeaways: 1. Families need more coherent guidance re: quarantining. Recs from CDC, NY health dept, NYC test and trace were all 10 days of isolation for the kid, but our doc said 14 days is the gold standard. Some confusion whether fam could "test out" of quarantine by day 7
2. Gotta stay vigilant. Cases in NYC are not declining the way they around the country, and school reopening along with relaxing restrictions in theaters, restaurants, wedding halls, etc. seem to explain that. This virus is still virulent and the NYC variant is a concern.
3. Masking and distancing work. My wife and other two kids stayed healthy despite rather close living arrangements. 4. The vaccine seems to work, though I was a little disgruntled to learn that my exemption from quarantine was only bc I'd been vaccinated within the last 3 mos.
5. After two weeks apart, sisters are pretty happy to hug each other again.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Last week, in a Supreme Court case that could cripple Voting Rights Act lawsuits challenging this type of racially targeted voter suppression, Justice Elena Kagan sounded a pretty effective warning to her center-right colleagues. nytimes.com/2021/03/06/us/…
There's no chance Arizona Democrats are going to persuade a SCOTUS majority that two AZ laws that seem to impose a mildly disparate burden on minorities violate sec. 2 of the Voting Rights Act. Even the Biden administration does not argue those laws violate the VRA.
The whole enchilada is how the Court is going to construe section 2 for *future* challenges to restrictive voting laws like the transparently racist bills in Georgia. This was Kagan's concern in a series of hypos she threw at Mike Carvin, the lawyer defending the AZ laws.
BREAKING: A splintered Supreme Court grants *partial* relief to churches in California challenging COVID public-health orders limiting prayer attendance, but requests to lift percentage capacity restrictions and permit indoor singing are denied.
This is a wild division:
- Thomas and Gorsuch would give the churches everything they want, including indoor singing.
- Alito would go nearly that far
- Kavanaugh, Barrett and Roberts would not allow singing, for now
- Kagan, Breyer and Sotomayor would not grant any relief
Kagan in the first line of her dissent decrying SCOTUS's micromanaging of states' response to the pandemic:
1. Four years from now, NYT says, another president can issue more executive orders & reverse Biden's. Sure, that's true. So should Biden sit tight with the Muslim ban, stay out of the Paris accord, etc., just bc four years from now these things may be undone?
2. NYT acknowledges that some of these EOs are necessary, as they erase Trump's "excesses." OK, you're onto something. See previous tweet.
NEW at SCOTUS: Emoluments clauses cases involving President Trump are dismissed as moot
A lot of people in the replies are upset and wondering how profiteering from the presidency could be moot after a president leaves office. It's a toughie. The q all along was what the remedy could be. Main one proposed: have Trump divest from his corporate holdings while prez...
But of course he's no longer president, so that is not necessary. He can profit all he likes now.
Weird takeaway: sometimes you can break a clear constitutional rule and get away with it.
BREAKING: Supreme Court denies emergency request from man with mental disabilities who has been in America for 42 years not to be deported to Haiti, his home country. Justice Sotomayor is the only justice to note her dissent.
Justice Sotomayor would allow Mr. Francois to remain in the country while he pursues his legal claim.
She argues that Mr. François will suffer irreparable harm if he is returned to Haiti, where he is unlikely to receive the mental health treatment he requires for his safety and well-being.