Liberty Profile picture
15 Mar, 16 tweets, 6 min read
The #PoliceCrackdownBill targets what makes our protest rights meaningful and gives the police even more powers to shut protests down.

Breakdown of this dangerous Bill [THREAD]:
CONDITIONS

Currently a senior police officer can place 3 conditions on a static protest (that stays in one place):
1. place
2. duration
3. number of people

#PoliceCrackdownBill lets the officer place any condition "as appear to him necessary" - a dangerously broad power.
NOISE

The #PoliceCrackdownBill says "noise generated by persons taking part" is a reason for police to impose conditions on a protest if the noise "may result in
serious disruption to the activities of an organisation which are carried out in the vicinity".
So if it's a static protest (that stays in one place, like outside Parliament), police can impose conditions if the noise "may have a relevant impact on persons in the vicinity […] and that impact is significant."
That 'impact could be 'serious unease'.
This is huge.

These changes hide those in power from public criticism, because they can effectively ban protests outside a whole range of powerful institutions (eg Parliament or New Scotland Yard) on the basis of inconvenience or disruption.
"SERIOUS DISRUPTION"

#PoliceCrackdownBill allows the Home Secretary to say what "serious disruption" is.

So the State can change its meaning at will to target the protest of any group it doesn't like.
CRIME TO BREACH CONDITIONS W/O KNOWING IT

#PoliceCrackdownBill will criminalise people who breach a police condition without knowing if they "ought to have known".

In effect, you could be criminalised if the police change conditions on the protest, but you didn't see the tweet.
This places an unfair burden on the organisers of protests to keep everyone in attendance informed and up to date on any conditions the police place on the protest.

And everyone there must also keep themselves up to date.
INCREASED SENTENCES

#PoliceCrackdownBill will also increase max sentences.

Max punishment for an organiser who strays from police-imposed conditions has increased from 3months' imprisonment to 11months imprisonment.

Fines for organisers and attendees will also increase.
NO PROTESTS AROUND PARLIAMENT

#PoliceCrackdownBill creates a buffer zone around Parliament.

When people are standing up to power, it's critical their voices can be heard. Banning protest in particular places of power could essentially make protests pointless.
PUBLIC NUISANCE

#PoliceCrackdownBill means that you could commit a public nuisance - and face up to 10 years' imprisonment - by 'obstructing the public’.

Nearly all protests ‘obstruct’ the public in some way – isn't that the whole point?
#PoliceCrackdownBill would create criminal penalties for people who cause 'serious annoyance' - striking at the very heart or protest.

The criminal penalties for causing serious annoyance are up to 10 years in prison.
Even if protest was considered a reasonable defence, it would only be a defence IN COURT.

This will prevent people from taking to the streets and making their voices heard.
Check out our full briefing that was sent to every MP
Use this link to quickly and easily tweet your MP to scrap the #PoliceCrackdownBill action.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/page/78247/twe…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Liberty

Liberty Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @libertyhq

26 Feb
BREAKING
Supreme Court has overturned previous ruling over Shamima Begum’s right to return to the UK to participate in her case.

The right to a fair trial protects all of us. Stripping someone’s citizenship without due process sets a dangerous precedent.
Citizenship-stripping is among the most extreme powers available to Gov. Making someone stateless is against international law.

Gov say Shamima Begum is eligible for Bangladeshi citizenship.

She was born in UK and has never held a Bangladeshi passport.
libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/misuse-o…
The right to a #fairtrial is not something democratic Govs should take away on a whim and nor is someone’s British citizenship.

If a Gov is allowed to wield extreme powers like banishment without the basic safeguards of a fair trial it sets an extremely dangerous precedent.
Read 4 tweets
25 Feb
Gov says it wants to build back better – but the road map does nothing to #ProtectEveryone already left behind.

We’ve teamed up with expert charities, NGOs + lawyers to present a new way forward that supports people to stay safe:

THE PROTECT EVERYONE BILL
We’ll only get through this pandemic if we #ProtectEveryone without exception.

In a few weeks MPs can reject Gov's Coronavirus Act – which has stripped away rights and left people behind.

And they can replace it with the Protect Everyone Bill.
libertyhumanrights.org.uk/fundamental/co…
🆕#ProtectEveryone Bill:

🔘Suspends the racist hostile environment
🔘Respects disabled people’s rights
🔘Ensures everyone has safe housing
🔘Makes sure everyone can meet their basic needs
🔘Protects protest rights
🔘Guarantees MPs vote on lockdown restrictions

And more.
Read 4 tweets
11 Nov 20
Protest ban is the latest attempt to limit our rights.

Elite sports = allowed
Schools & unis = open
Film & TV = going ahead

But without justification or explanation, Gov took this chance to ban protest - and within days there were more than 200 arrests. libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/protest-…
Earlier this year, racial justice protesters were kettled. And a trans rights advocacy group cancelled a protest when police said they'd be arrested and fined.

The pandemic is being used as an excuse for crackdown on protest, but it’s not the whole picture.
Last year, the Met unlawfully banned protest across London, and arrested over 1,000 people at Extinction Rebellion demos.

In correspondence with the Home Sec, Met Commissioner said the climate change protests created “opportunities” to limit the right to protest.
Read 4 tweets
27 Jul 20
BREAKING | #StopAndSearch

We've uncovered new figures showing the Met Police dramatically increased use of the most discriminatory form of stop and search during lockdown.
theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/j…
Section 60 orders allow police to stop and search people without any suspicion - a recipe for discrimination.

It's only supposed to be used if there has been violence or when serious violence may occur in a specific area.

Met police issued 65 in May - up from 13 in April.
Black people are almost 10 times more likely to be stopped under regular (so-called section 1) stop and search powers than white people.
Read 9 tweets
28 Aug 19
#FacialRecognition is being used by police and private companies in public places. It’s use is discriminatory and authoritarian. We need to ban it.

Sign the petition now
👇👇👇
liberty.e-activist.com/page/46698/pet…
Facial Recognition cameras scan everyone within range, making a biometric map of their face – which is more like taking a fingerprint than a photo. This is hugely disproportionate surveillance.
Facial recognition cameras will make us more likely to self-censor, affecting where we go and who with.
We shouldn’t have to change how we live our lives to protect ourselves from unwarranted surveillance.
Read 4 tweets
20 May 19
The first-ever UK court case against police use of #FacialRecognition tech on our streets starts tomorrow.

South Wales Police has used the rights-abusing, discriminatory tech on the public over 50 times. We’re going to put an end to it.

#ResistFacialRec
#FacialRecognition cameras are light-years away from regular CCTV. They scan everyone within range and make unique biometric maps of their faces - more like a fingerprint than a photograph.
The biometric maps made by #FacialRecognition cameras are then matched against watch lists the police put together. These lists can include entirely innocent people. In 2017, the tech was used to target people with mental health conditions. theguardian.com/technology/201…
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!