Being able to color groups based on a graph view search in @obsdmd is brilliant. Here I'm narrowing my website's contents down to "onboarding" and coloring the results.
However, some of these nodes certainly overlap. If only it showed that somehow? Perhaps split colors?
However, some of these nodes certainly overlap. If only it showed that somehow? Perhaps split colors?
Given that I can hover preview over any node, this might be preferable to viewing search results in a linear format... ideally with a way to see nodes with split colors, and would require me to have really good titles for notes.
https://twitter.com/RobertHaisfield/status/1258785966459764738
On that note... why can't I color code linear search results in the same way I can color code graph search results? Wouldn't that also provide me with similarly helpful utility?
There's a chance (I'm still playing around with it, but there's a chance) that Obsidian is better for power users than Roam is IF you know how to do terminal/CLI stuff. Their advanced search is pretty incredible, and we might be getting a linked ref filter plugin soon.
@RoamResearch is still probably the most frictionless way to get high power. It's ironic... Obsidian is easier to pick up for many, w/ potentially a higher skill ceiling, but that ceiling requires external tooling/more work. Roam is easier to master once you get its logic imo
Example: I could do a search in my terminal for my open questions related to GuidedTrack community, pipe those results over to 15.ai to turn them into a podcast, and go on a walk while listening to them. (h/t @someone10987507 for the idea)
However, no reason I know of though that someone couldn't make a CLI to run queries on your @RoamResearch database so you could pipe those elsewhere, especially with improvements to the API. Doesn't exist yet though.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
