How did so many rich, but sociopath-led, countries get it so wrong? How did others get it so right? nymag.com/intelligencer/…
"[T]he UK was consumed with Brexit..The US had Trump..As the pandemic progressed, both [sociopath-led] countries flipped from denial to capitulation, choosing to treat almost any caseload plateau as an opportunity to relax, no matter how high..ongoing spread it represented."
"For decades, the richest nations of the world had told themselves a [lie] in which wealth and medical superiority offered, if not total immunity from disease, then certainly a guarantee against pandemics, regarded as a premodern residue of the underdeveloped world."
"That arrogance has made the coronavirus..a staggering..plague..It was these countries that suffered most, died most, flailed most. Gave up most easily, too"
"For nearly the entire year, the COVID epicenter was not in China, where the pathogen originated, or in corners of South Asia or sub-Saharan Africa, where limited state capacity and medical infrastructure seemed, at the outset, especially concerning, but..in Europe or the US"
The gold-standard responses were..in East Asia and Oceania, by countries like South Korea, New Zealand, and Australia—countries that saw..the..threat..and endeavored to simply eradicate it..[T]hey succeeded..[No] nation in what was once..called 'the West' even..bothered to try."
"In Europe, North America, and South America: nearly universal failure..In East Asia, South-East Asia and Oceania: inarguable success."
"[T]he successful national campaigns resemble each other in the speed and intensity of response, and all of the failures share a similar reluctance to move preemptively—instead needing to be forced into action by the disease."
"Either you control this early on, in which case the trade-offs are..manageable.., or you don’t and you end up in a space which..no advanced polity’s decision-making process is..good at coping with. And so then it’s really a matter of degrees of failure across the board."
"An early, globally coordinated pause on travel, the virologist Florian Krammer says, would have likely averted catastrophe"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"David Relman, a microbiologist at Stanford University, says a lab leak was never the subject of a 'fair and dispassionate discussion of the facts as we know them.'"
"Relman agrees that in the absence of conclusive evidence, the message on origins should be 'we don’t know.'..[H]e found himself increasingly disheartened by those who..had seized on a spillover scenario, despite 'an amazing absence of data.'"
"[L]ab-release dangers are growing as well. The risk increases in proportion with the number of labs handling bioweapons and potential pandemic pathogens (more than 1,500 globally in 2010)..many of them, like the Wuhan lab, located in urban areas close to international airports."
Taiwan: 0.4 per million (10 deaths)
China: 3 per million (4,636 deaths)
Singapore: 5 per million (30 deaths)
Hong Kong: 27 per million (203 deaths)
South Korea: 33 per million (1,678 deaths)
Japan: 60 per million (7,584 deaths)
US: 1,700 per million (549,145 deaths; +2K daily)
New Zealand: 5 per million (26 deaths)
Australia: 35 per million (909 deaths)
..
UK: 1,800 per million (125,690 deaths)
Nations that successfully suppressed outbreak include both small and large, both island and non-island, and both autocratic and democratic.
Sole relevant parameter for success or failure is whether government took prompt resolute action (success) or whether it did not (failure).
"Given what we’ve been through over the past year, you’d imagine that governments are already working to tighten up international regulation of pathogens..But it turns out the real story isn’t comforting at all."
"There’s no formal international body of rules governing research on potentially dangerous biological agents..There’s no international organization monitoring virology research..[T]here’s not even a code of rules.., only..non-binding guidance"
@peiferlabunc@RepThomasMassie Fauci understated the threat at every stage in the pandemic prior to the eve of presidential election.
He did so contrary to the facts that were available at the time and that, almost certainly, were known to him and understood by him at the time.
@peiferlabunc@RepThomasMassie On January 21, 2020--as the crisis in Wuhan unfolded on news media worldwide--Fauci claimed "this is not a major threat,”
@peiferlabunc@RepThomasMassie On 01/26/20--three days after China locked down 11 million persons on Wuhan and two days day began constructing China began building 1000-bed emergency hospital in Wuhabs--Fauci claimed "The American people should not be worried...It’s a very, very low risk to the United States."
Taiwan: 0.3 per million (7 deaths)
China: 3 per million (4,636 deaths)
Singapore: 5 per million (29 deaths)
Hong Kong: 25 per million (189 deaths)
South Korea: 29 per million (1,496 deaths)
Japan: 52 per million (6,557 deaths)
US: 1,500 per million (483,200 deaths; +3K daily)
New Zealand: 5 per million (25 deaths)
Australia: 35 per million (909 deaths)
..
UK: 1,700 per million (114,851 deaths)
Nations that successfully suppressed outbreak include both small and large, both island and non-island, and both autocratic and democratic.
Sole relevant parameter for success or failure is whether government took prompt resolute action (success) or whether it did not (failure).
"Cuomo’s plan to reopen New York City restaurants for indoor dining..is baffling."
"Too many leaders..are ignoring [reality]..Massachusetts and New Jersey are allowing..restaurants..to expand..indoor service..and Iowa just lifted its mask mandate."
"It’s not just their own efforts they are undermining. They are also thwarting their citizens who have been making collective sacrifices all along."
"Average people have spent the better part of the past year waiting for leaders to take charge. America finally has those leaders in place at the national level, but the nation needs better and more consistent leadership on this issue at the state level."