First, let's remember that less than two years ago at its annual F8 summit, Facebook announced that it would be pivoting to make the Groups feature a central part of the platform.
Facebook's announcement highlights its recent efforts to stop recommending certain groups.
"we recently removed civic and political groups, as well as newly created groups, from recommendations in the US."
But that is false. They're still recommending civic groups TODAY. 👇👇
For nearly a year, TTP's investigations on militia movements like the boogaloo have shed light on the dangerous role of Facebook Groups.
Facebook relies on Group admins to moderate content. But when a Group is full of like-minded people, like militia. No one is going to report.
The combination of failure to effectively moderate harmful content combined with the algorithmic amplification of that content has helped these bourgeoning militia groups on the platform.
See the case of the militia plot to kidnap Gov Whitmer.
Facebook recommending harmful Groups is nothing new.
TTP's #BrokenPromises series showed how the platform was still recommending boogaloo Groups *months* after the platform claimed it had stopped recommendations in a PR statement similar to the one today. techtransparencyproject.org/articles/faceb…
Facebook's PR statement claims it will warn users attempting to join a Group with policy violations.
But if like-minded Group members don't report content, those policy strikes won't exist.
And if a Group does have policy violations that trigger this, why is it still active?
Facebook makes no distinction in the policy violations it's addressing. This statement is vague on details.
Is a violation for election misinfo weighed the same as a violation for sharing bomb-making instructions? How many bomb instructions are shared before a group is removed?
Even if users make engage in violating activity, Facebook's statement makes clear it has no plans to *stop* those users, only slow their reach.
But what if those years are, for instance, a Group for militia planning to kidnap a Governor or attack protesters?
Facebook is already failing.
Just two days ago a user posted a call for people to join a Three Percenter militia group in New York.
The post remains active, carries no warnings, and has 192 comments from interested Group members.
Don't buy Facebook's PR at face value.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NEW: Facebook has failed to effectively crack down on militia and election conspiracies. Now, it's accelerating the growth of a new far-right movement.
An investigation by TTP found that months before Trump mentioned the "Patriot Party," his followers had already taken up that mantle on Facebook, forming an extensive array of “Patriot Party” groups and pages used to recruit militia and organize for rallies, including Jan. 6.
TTP identified 51 Facebook Groups and 85 Facebook Pages that include “Patriot Party” in their name or use iconography that’s come to be associated with the movement. Roughly two-thirds of the groups and more than half of the pages were created after the 2020 election.
On June 16, Facebook first announced the company would be launching a Voting Information Center, a key element in Facebook’s effort to register 4 million new voters.
In a @USAToday op-ed on June 17, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced that Facebook would be embarking on the “largest voting information campaign in American history” usatoday.com/story/opinion/…
TTP first warned about Facebook boogaloo groups in April, documenting how members were using them to organize for a coming civil war and share tactics and bomb manuals.
Following TTP’s April report, Facebook told Huff Post @letsgomathias it had taken down groups and pages that use “boogaloo” and related terms and would “enforce against any violations.”
#NEW: Whenever Google is caught doing something dubious, its response is always the same: Blame someone else.
We've pulled together a sampling of Google's blame-shifting and created a parody "Google Doodle." Play the "Google Blame Game" here: googletransparencyproject.org/articles/play-… 1/4
When journalists or regulators have raised questions about Google's conduct, Google has cast blame at different times to Microsoft, Apple, Rupert Murdoch, Viacom, Oracle, Fox, AT&T, MPAA, NBC Universal, publishers, competitors... 2/4
...comparison shopping sites, “some existing providers,” “a small number of websites”—even “an anti-Google Industrial Complex.” politico.com/story/2011/02/… 3/4