This seems right to me.

I don't know what the cause is. But my guess is that it has to do with the KIND of threat that each adversary poses/posed.

We COULD acknowledge that maybe Japan had some things right. But we can't acknowledge that about China, without loosing our soul.
The fear of Japan was concrete: in near-mode.

We were afraid that they were going to out-compete us by just being smarter and better at the capitalism game.

They were another western-ish liberal Democracy, like us. But they were going to be better than us at it.
The fear of China is different. It's is ideological, far mode.

Like, it isn't just that they'll win on the merits, but they'll win with (because of?) their evil system.

It's not just a material threat, but also a spiritual threat to American ideals.
We could learn and copy Japaneses systems and methods, but we can't copy Chinese systems and methods, because the latter are bound up in ideological commitments that are anti-American.
If we looked close at what works in China, we would have to face up to the practical tradeoffs of democracy and freedom of speech. We might notice that they have costs.
But, we're really proud of those institutions. We feel that we're better than the likes of China because of them.
So if we looked close at China, we would feel the fear of needing to face up to how maybe we aren't God-blessed for our Democracy. Maybe we're not enlightened. Maybe the American ideal doesn't work as well as we thought, and maybe other things work better.
This is an ego-threat.

(An "ego" is the story that an entity tells about itself to maintain coherence, so that it can act predictably to itself, despite being complex and multi-faceted.)
A FULL cultural realization of even the _possibility_ of America's ideals not ultimately prevailing, would prompt a crisis of faith, or if you prefer, a cultural ego-death.
That's some heavy shit. You need to have a paradigm shift sometimes, but it is destructive. You don't want to do that all willy-nilly.
I posit America has a collective blind-spot around China because we can tell, from our "peripheral vision", that the existence of China _maybe_ undermines our organizing faith that democracy, freedom, etc. is the best system.
It would be critically bad (for our cultural suppositions), if what China is doing WORKS for building and having a good society. And we kind of suspect that it MIGHT work.

So we're carefully, if unconsciously, not looking.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Eli Tyre

Eli Tyre Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EpistemicHope

18 Mar
Question: Have Moral Mazes been getting worse over time?

Could the growth of Moral Mazes be the cause of cost disease?
I was thinking about how I could answer this question. I think that the thing that I need is a good quantitative measure of how "mazy" an organization is.
I considered the metric of "how much output for each input", but 1) that metric is just cost disease itself, so it doesn't help us distinguish the mazy cause from other possible causes.
Read 6 tweets
18 Mar
This was the most informative and thought provoking youtube video that I've watched in 6 months at least.

It changed my sense of China, and I've made use of the ideas expressed multiple times since I first watched it (different ideas each time, too).

This is the only one that comes to mind as a contender for value per minute.

Again, I would love recommendations that are similar to either of the above.
Read 5 tweets
8 Mar
I hadn't realized this, but it seems like a crucial insight.

Systems incorporate the powerful effects of the things that they're exposed to, so that there are diminishing marginal returns to those powerful effects.

"Powerful" in this sense is relative to a time and place.
Also (interestingly) related: slatestarcodex.com/2013/04/11/rea…
Read 5 tweets
8 Mar
"Maybe, power dynamics in society aren’t so much about who is in charge. The problem is someone has to be."

I'm not sure that this is _necessarily_ true. Is there a way to socialize people so they do a good job of being in charge?
Is it possible to train people to be good rulers? So that the people with privilege are good social stewards instead of assholes?
I don't know. The historical record is not great on this point. It seems like trying to be a social steward tends to morph into thinking that you're better than everyone else, and deserve the best stuff at the expense of everyone else.
Read 9 tweets
8 Mar
Running with this to see if it holds up:
Example 1: "It's low status to sleep in your car."

I can totally believe that this is code for "'the authorities' don't want you to sleep in your car."
It seems like this kind of thing is punished waayyy out of proportion to the the cost to society (which is basically non-existent, as near as I can tell).

But this is one way to escape from high rents and therefore wage slavery. Thus, punished, and censured as low status.
Read 8 tweets
7 Mar
Thread, responding to @silencenbetween, on my current guesses about why an emphasis on virtue seems notably absent in our society, compared to my imagining / understanding of other societies in history.
\/
2
3
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!