US state outlet Voice of America's "fact-checking website" @PolygraphInfo deems claims of an OPCW Syria cover-up "false" and a "conspiracy theory." They are obviously nervous that a group of eminent voices -- including five former OPCW officials -- just called out the cover-up.
For a supposed "fact-checking website," US state-run @PolygraphInfo gets the facts blatantly wrong. I'll correct tomorrow. But for now, note something curious: this "fact-check", unlike every other article I see on Polygraph, has no author. Who wrote it? archive.is/HXtK2
I asked @PolygraphInfo why their error-ridden "fact-check" on the OPCW scandal doesn't identify its author, unlike every other article on the site that I checked. VOA's @jimfryVOA replied: "VOA does not always identify authors for their safety and that of their families abroad."
I then asked @jimfryVOA if there are any other prior examples of @PolygraphInfo hiding the author, or if this is the first time they have done so.
He declined to answer the question: "This is all we have for you on this matter."
I then asked @jimfryVOA: "Even if you can't produce a single example [of concealing an article's author], perhaps you can at least answer my Yes/No question of whether this is the first time that your outlet has concealed an author's name? Yes or No?"
No response yet.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
A big development in the OPCW's Syria cover-up scandal: a group of eminent signatories -- including *five* former OPCW officials -- call on the OPCW to stop suppressing the findings of the Douma probe and let the dissenting scientists air their concerns: couragefound.org/2021/03/statem…
Other signatories supporting the OPCW whistleblowers include ex-UN senior officials Denis Halliday & Hans von Sponeck; Noam Chomsky; Daniel Ellsberg; and Col. Lawrence Wilkerson.
The OPCW "now stands accused of accepting unsubstantiated or possibly manipulated findings with the most serious geo-political and security implications."
Remember when Senate Intel called Kilimnik a Russian spy & Russiagaters claimed vindication? I showed that SSCI had no evidence & ignored countervailing facts. I also reported that FBI had not changed its assessment that KK only has vague RU intel "ties." realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/…
No one tried to refute my reporting, opting for Russiagate fan fiction instead. Well today FBI issued an alert for Kilimnik on old warrant. Look how they describe him: he is "assessed by the FBI to have ties to Russian Intelligence." FBI, unlike SSCI, still not calling him a spy.
Now ask yourself: if FBI is not describing Kilimnik as a "Russian intelligence officer", how could Senate Intel Committee, with far less investigative powers & info, know something they don't? What Mark Warner has is an imagination, and an extremely credulous media to lap it up.
.@NYTBen's latest on Syria's economic and food crisis continues what is becoming one of Western media's most cherished traditions: giving crippling, murderous and illegal US sanctions only a single, passing, and buried mention. nytimes.com/2021/02/23/wor…
The fact that US sanctions destroy Syria's economy & prevent reconstruction isn't a secret. Trump envoy James Jeffrey openly brags that the US "crushed [Syria]’s economy through sanctions."
BTW, @NYTBen's "Western sanctions" is another misnomer. These are *US sanctions*, under the Caesar Act. They explicitly target Syria's reconstruction and any global entity that somehow helps it. That's why the UN Special Rapporteur calls them illegal. thegrayzone.com/2021/01/14/un-…
In an interview with me, ex-House intel investigator & national security official Kash Patel says that hidden docs expose more gaping evidentiary holes in some of US intel & Mueller probe's most explosive Russiagate claims. The public has a right to know. realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/…
US intel claims of "sweeping and systematic" Russian interference have been widely accepted as unquestioned Truth, without scrutinizing the actual evidence. I laid out the flaws in July 2019, "Crowdstrikeout" (realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/…). This interview bolsters that skepticism.
Biggest evidentiary hole starts w/ Crowdstrike, DNC contractor that first accused Russia of DNC hacking. CEO admitted in December 2017 that CS had no "concrete evidence", but that was buried until May 2020. And it's still buried in practice: no major media outlet has reported it.
He says we're "Kremlin-sympathising media.” @olliecarroll, what do you mean by this? I advocated Biden’s victory — does that make me "White House-sympathising media"?
And if media is a schoolyard where we all have to pick sides, are you saying you're "Downing Street-symphasising media" -- aka a state propagandist? Journalists, I think, should sympathize with people and facts, not governments -- no matter which side of the schoolyard may agree.
Quite possible these files were hacked. The group that released it is anonymous and UK gov't has previously claimed a hack. Curious to see this label applied to @TheGrayzoneNews leaks that challenge Western narratives, versus say Intercept leaks on China & Iran that advance them.