US state outlet Voice of America's "fact-checking website" @PolygraphInfo deems claims of an OPCW Syria cover-up "false" and a "conspiracy theory." They are obviously nervous that a group of eminent voices -- including five former OPCW officials -- just called out the cover-up. Image
For a supposed "fact-checking website," US state-run @PolygraphInfo gets the facts blatantly wrong. I'll correct tomorrow. But for now, note something curious: this "fact-check", unlike every other article I see on Polygraph, has no author. Who wrote it? archive.is/HXtK2 Image
I asked @PolygraphInfo why their error-ridden "fact-check" on the OPCW scandal doesn't identify its author, unlike every other article on the site that I checked. VOA's @jimfryVOA replied: "VOA does not always identify authors for their safety and that of their families abroad." Image
I then asked @jimfryVOA if there are any other prior examples of @PolygraphInfo hiding the author, or if this is the first time they have done so.

He declined to answer the question: "This is all we have for you on this matter." ImageImage
I then asked @jimfryVOA: "Even if you can't produce a single example [of concealing an article's author], perhaps you can at least answer my Yes/No question of whether this is the first time that your outlet has concealed an author's name? Yes or No?"

No response yet. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aaron Maté

Aaron Maté Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @aaronjmate

11 Mar
A big development in the OPCW's Syria cover-up scandal: a group of eminent signatories -- including *five* former OPCW officials -- call on the OPCW to stop suppressing the findings of the Douma probe and let the dissenting scientists air their concerns: couragefound.org/2021/03/statem…
Other signatories supporting the OPCW whistleblowers include ex-UN senior officials Denis Halliday & Hans von Sponeck; Noam Chomsky; Daniel Ellsberg; and Col. Lawrence Wilkerson.

To US media: how long will you continue to bury this scandal? cc @democracynow @TheIntercept
The OPCW "now stands accused of accepting unsubstantiated or possibly manipulated findings with the most serious geo-political and security implications."
Read 11 tweets
26 Feb
Remember when Senate Intel called Kilimnik a Russian spy & Russiagaters claimed vindication? I showed that SSCI had no evidence & ignored countervailing facts. I also reported that FBI had not changed its assessment that KK only has vague RU intel "ties." realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2020/…
No one tried to refute my reporting, opting for Russiagate fan fiction instead. Well today FBI issued an alert for Kilimnik on old warrant. Look how they describe him: he is "assessed by the FBI to have ties to Russian Intelligence." FBI, unlike SSCI, still not calling him a spy.
Now ask yourself: if FBI is not describing Kilimnik as a "Russian intelligence officer", how could Senate Intel Committee, with far less investigative powers & info, know something they don't? What Mark Warner has is an imagination, and an extremely credulous media to lap it up.
Read 4 tweets
25 Feb
.@NYTBen's latest on Syria's economic and food crisis continues what is becoming one of Western media's most cherished traditions: giving crippling, murderous and illegal US sanctions only a single, passing, and buried mention.
nytimes.com/2021/02/23/wor…
The fact that US sanctions destroy Syria's economy & prevent reconstruction isn't a secret. Trump envoy James Jeffrey openly brags that the US "crushed [Syria]’s economy through sanctions."

Why is an ex-US official more honest than a news outlet?
foreignaffairs.com/articles/middl…
BTW, @NYTBen's "Western sanctions" is another misnomer. These are *US sanctions*, under the Caesar Act. They explicitly target Syria's reconstruction and any global entity that somehow helps it. That's why the UN Special Rapporteur calls them illegal. thegrayzone.com/2021/01/14/un-…
Read 7 tweets
25 Feb
In an interview with me, ex-House intel investigator & national security official Kash Patel says that hidden docs expose more gaping evidentiary holes in some of US intel & Mueller probe's most explosive Russiagate claims. The public has a right to know.
realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2021/…
US intel claims of "sweeping and systematic" Russian interference have been widely accepted as unquestioned Truth, without scrutinizing the actual evidence. I laid out the flaws in July 2019, "Crowdstrikeout" (realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/…). This interview bolsters that skepticism.
Biggest evidentiary hole starts w/ Crowdstrike, DNC contractor that first accused Russia of DNC hacking. CEO admitted in December 2017 that CS had no "concrete evidence", but that was buried until May 2020. And it's still buried in practice: no major media outlet has reported it.
Read 5 tweets
24 Feb
Rather than reach out for comment — you know, journalism — @olliecarroll of @TheIndependent chose to print some sleazy innuendo about me and @TheGrayzoneNews. independent.co.uk/news/world/eur…
He says we're "Kremlin-sympathising media.” @olliecarroll, what do you mean by this? I advocated Biden’s victory — does that make me "White House-sympathising media"?
And if media is a schoolyard where we all have to pick sides, are you saying you're "Downing Street-symphasising media" -- aka a state propagandist? Journalists, I think, should sympathize with people and facts, not governments -- no matter which side of the schoolyard may agree.
Read 7 tweets
23 Feb
Twitter adds a warning to @MaxBlumenthal's report in @TheGrayzoneNews on leaked UK gov't files (thegrayzone.com/2021/02/20/reu…) exposing a major propaganda campaign targeting Russia: "These materials may have been obtained through hacking."

Is this warning applied equally? I doubt it. Image
Quite possible these files were hacked. The group that released it is anonymous and UK gov't has previously claimed a hack. Curious to see this label applied to @TheGrayzoneNews leaks that challenge Western narratives, versus say Intercept leaks on China & Iran that advance them.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!