Joel Baden Profile picture
18 Mar, 16 tweets, 3 min read
#Exodus 24:1-11

The covenant...and a picnic?

As we return to the narrative from the laws of the Covenant Code, we are immediately faced with problems. This is a classic little section for compositional analysis, and it revolves mostly around where Moses is supposed to be.
When we left Moses canonically, of course, he was up on the mountain receiving the laws of the Covenant Code. So when we start here in 24:1 with instructions for Moses to ascend, that should be a red flag.
It’s only made worse when God goes on to say that not just Moses, but a bunch of the people he left behind down at the bottom of the mountain should ascend with him. It seems pretty clear that Moses isn’t where Moses ought to be.
Compounding that is the fact that two verses later, in 24:3, before Moses and his friends are said to actually ascend as commanded, we’re told that he comes down - he goes to the people, which is just where he should have already been.
And in 24:3, when Moses repeats to the people what YHWH has just told him, presumably that’s not the invitation to go up the mountain; it’s the laws and the rules, the mishpatim - which can’t be anything other than the Covenant Code, which is explicitly called mishpatim in 22:1.
So it’s pretty straightforward: 24:3 is the direct continuation of the end of the Covenant Code; 24:1, in turn, picks up directly on the last verse we had in J, Exod 19:25, which had Moses going back down the mountain to tell the people (again) to keep their distance.
The movements of the two narratives are thus going in opposite directions. In J, Moses is now going up the mountain, with his friends; in E, he’s coming down, with the laws. The rest of 24:4-8 is patently E, as the people make the covenant on the basis of those laws.
In here they twice repeat the same covenant acceptance formula that they already stated even before hearing the details, back in Exod 19:8: “whatever YHWH says, we’ll obey and do it.” They have a whole covenant ceremony, with sacrifices and blood rituals.
And then suddenly in 24:9, guess what? Moses and his pals are heading up the mountain, fulfilling the command of 24:1-2 that evidently everyone was happy to just ignore for a bit while they did something else.
That doesn’t happen - commands don’t go unfulfilled while characters go off and do other stuff. This is a classic discontinuity. Obviously 24:9 originally stood directly after 24:2, as its precise fulfillment. And in 24:10 we understand what they were all doing up there.
Just as was the case back in Exodus 19, for J the theophanic experience at the mountain is entirely a visual one. The people see YHWH from a distance but aren’t allowed up the mountain; Moses and the Israelite leaders get closer and see more; and Moses will soon see God up close.
Israel’s god, by the by, isn’t invisible. (Just another way that our modern conceptions of God aren’t aligned with those of our sacred books.) There may not be a statue of God in the sanctuary, but biblical characters see God all the time.
Precautions are put in place - here, and in the sanctuary itself (curtains, incense) - to prevent unfettered visual access to the deity. Seeing God, as 24:11 makes clear, is dangerous, potentially fatal - but that only reinforces the fact that God can be seen.
The final two words (in Hebrew) of 24:11 have caused all kinds of consternation in scholarship, have spawned all sorts of theories, and it’s all very silly. “They ate and drank” - who did? We’ve got two stories here - who’s more likely to be eating and drinking?
Did the elders who went up the mountain with Moses pack a picnic? It’s possible, but a little ridiculous. On the other hand, in E it would refer to Moses and the Israelites who had just offered sacrifices at their covenant ceremony. That seems...better.
What’s more, the sacrifices they offered were specifically “peace” offerings, that is, the ones that the offerors get the meat back from so that they can celebrate with a meal. So...yeah. No picnic on the mountain, I’m afraid. Rather, a sacrificial meal at a covenant ceremony.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Joel Baden

Joel Baden Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JoelBaden

22 Apr
#Exodus 31:12-17

Sabbath

Why does P feel the need to put the sabbath law here? (We might actually ask why P has a sabbath law at all, if we were being cheeky, but I’ll let it slide.) But why here, in the Tabernacle blueprint section?
The rabbinic-style answer would be that here all Israel is working at building the Tabernacle, so they need to know to stop on the seventh day. Which is also why the categories of work forbidden on Shabbat are aligned with those needed to build the Tabernacle.
There’s something to that - at least, the sense that this is an all-Israel venture, and the sabbath is too, while the ritual laws to come in Leviticus are almost entirely about individuals.
Read 9 tweets
21 Apr
#Exodus 31:1-11

Bezalel

This is really just a long-ish section of YHWH telling Moses that a couple of dudes, Bezalel and Oholiab, are going to be the lead craftsmen for the Tabernacle, with help from whoever is similarly gifted. My question is: who is Bezalel?
I don’t mean in the narrative world: we get his full two-generation genealogy and his tribal affiliation, and we know what his function in the story is. I mean more like, where did he come from in the tradition?
He’s known only to P, which is sensible, since only P has the whole Tabernacle thing. But where does P get the name, the genealogy, the tribal affiliation? Is it just invented entirely? Is it some old tradition among the priests? Was the name written in graffiti on the altar?
Read 5 tweets
29 Mar
#Exodus 27:1-8

The sacrificial altar

For the center of activity in the Tabernacle, the altar doesn't get any special attention here - fewer verses devoted to it than to the court in the next section, for example. And there are aspects of it here that, well, don't matter much.
Why does it need to have a mesh grating? I don't know. It just does, okay? The poles and the hollowness - well, those are for carrying the thing, but they have no other function.
All of this just to say: what we're doing here is describing the objects in the Tabernacle - bringing them solidly into the mind of the reader. There's going to be chapters and chapters of what to do with them, especially with this one.
Read 4 tweets
28 Mar
#Exodus 26:31-37

What...the curtains?

The sacred space in the Tabernacle is marked off by the fancy curtains, made of the rarest colors - blue, crimson, and purple - and the finest weaves and designs. These are basically the doors - remember, the desert Tabernacle is a tent.
Hey remember that bit in the Ten Commandments that some people think means that you couldn’t have any images of anything anywhere in ancient Israel? Explain the depictions of the cherubs declaring the curtain in the holiest space in Israel, then. (Don’t really try, please.)
I said before that gradations of holiness in the Tabernacle are signaled by the metals used in its construction, and here’s a good example. Silver sockets for the inner curtain, copper for the outer curtain. Is it super important? No. Is it a thoughtful detail? Sure.
Read 5 tweets
25 Mar
#Exodus 25:23-30

The table

If the ark and its cover are the place where YHWH sits, the table is...well, the place where YHWH eats and drinks. Yeah, I said it.
It’s a gold table with gold drinking vessels and you’re supposed to put bread on it. Later Jewish interpretation went to great lengths to describe how the bread was to be laid out, and changed weekly, etc., but the Bible doesn’t give us any of that.
All we know is that there is supposed to be bread and wine on the table in the inner sanctum of YHWH’s dwelling place, the Tabernacle, and for sure no one else is eating and drinking in there.
Read 6 tweets
24 Mar
#Exodus 25:17-22

The cover for the ark

Or, if you’re being old-timey about it, the “mercy seat.” I find that translation funny - like, as if “mercy seat” is a known thing, and Moses should just make one. Hey, make a mercy seat. It’s, you know, not a thing.
The translation “mercy seat” comes from the notion that the Hebrew name, כפרת, comes from the same root that means “atone” (though the jump from there to “mercy” has a pretty goyish ring to me, I must admit). The idea would be that from here YHWH accepts atonement for sins.
But that isn’t what the text says, here or anywhere else either. P is pretty clear about what this thing is for: it’s the precise spot in the inner sanctum of the Tabernacle where YHWH physically exists, and from where YHWH speaks to Moses (cf. Exod 30:6; Num 7:89).
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!