Parable: There is a story about a safe who was robbed. As the thief was running away with his wallet, the safe shouted out, “I want you to have it.” (The sage didn’t want the thief to have the sin of theft on his moral tab.)
So too, initially, we were forbidden to steal fire from the god(s), to eat from the tree of knowledge, to open Pandora’s box, etc. but as we were walking away, the divine said, “I want you to have it.”
This is why the Torah is called a “gift”—what began as rebellion (scaling heaven by means of the Tower of Babel)—was transmuted, as God said, “I want you to have it.”
Do I believe this? I don’t know know. It’s an experiment. Is knowledge/insight a gift or theft, or both? For the ancient poets it was the former, for Baconian scientists, the latter.
Maybe the scientists thought “property was theft”—and so felt entitled to take what was never God’s to begin with. Perhaps they thought the knowledge was their due as reparations for the calamity of having been created (without consent).
Sage* (autocorrected to sage)
The original catastrophe, according to Beit Shammai, is that none of choose to be born.
Perhaps when knowledge is transmuted from stolen object to granted gift, we transmute ourselves from resentful earthlings to to beings who accept our earthly condition, much like, during Purim, the people transformed their coercive origin at Sinai into something voluntary...
Yom Kippur is God's "truth and reconciliation"; God brings a sacrifice, apologizes for creating us against our will; we forgive God, and all move on.
Yom Kippur is like Purim in that on both days God is effectively forgiven by us as we are forgiven by God. The original crime on which existence is based becomes not a blemish, but a virtue.
As one sage puts it, sins of which we genuinely repent don't simply go away, but become de facto commandments for which we get reward.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Time for a @threadapalooza on Hegel, the 19th c. thinker everyone loves to hate (and/or hates to love, hates to hate, loves to love). Hegel has been celebrated and accused of pretty much every political ideology, from National Socialism, Communism, and neoliberalism.
Depending on who you talk to, he's a rationalist or a mystic, a secularist who reduces religion to social psychology or a Christian triumphalist who thinks incarnation theology (God becoming Man, Man Becoming God) alone can bring about the resolution of our problems. 2
Hegel is charged with pantheism (everything is God), process theology (the notion that truth is revealed progressively throughout history). Its fashionable to think of Hegel as proto-woke (see here: persuasion.community/p/the-warped-v…) and/but Hegel is also hated for being a Eurocentrist. 3
“The ultras can live happily with each other; they need each other; they thrive off each other. They share the revolutionary mentality, the excitement of apocalyptic feeling.”
“The crowds and their leaders are seeking the re-enchantment of politics, but we long ago championed the disenchantment of politics“
“People who mock the idea of rights, and the “culture of rights,” have never been stripped of one. And nobody who has ever been deprived of a right has ever been troubled by its “individualism.“”
Adorno would recoil at being subjected to a @threadapalooza as it turns him into a commodity, his thought into a kind of brand or currency. Still, his ideas are timely & influential; if you want to understand today's left, internecine conflicts & culture wars, he's a touchstone.
He would have hated being on social media for 1000 reasons, which we will get into, but the first is that limiting oneself to bite-size short form is not dialectical; it "reifies" (glamorizes, distills) the hot take, but leaves little room for the nuanced "yes, but also." 2
He would find followership to be not only a vain metric, but a distraction from "truth" which should be indifferent to popularity, and may more likely negatively correlate with it. 3
"There’s a folkloric saying that Breslov Hasidim are obsessed with joy because they are depressives; Karliner Hasidim are obsessed with controlling their emotions because they are angry; and Chabad Hasidim are obsessed with nullifying their egos because they are ego-maniacs."
"What’s the worldview that reduces worldview to a psychological theory of overcompensation all about? Probably the fact that the world is messy and challenges a sense of control. Psychological models are socially acceptable transitional objects."
Let's do a @threadapalooza about Ludwig Wittgenstein, one of the greatest minds of the 20th century, a philosophical prodigy who started as a formal logician and ended as a kind of avant-garde artist, sage, and Zen-like monk. Throughout his life, he was obsessed with language.
Here is Wittgenstein in the second half of his career, having distanced himself from his Tractatus (the work that launched him to global fame): "Philosophy ought really to be written only as a form of poetry." (Philosophie dürfte man eigentlich nur dichten.) 2/
Wittgenstein started out a #positivist (focused on distinguishing between valid propositions and nonsensical ones). But he ends up concluding that language is far more more robust and meaningful than what the analytic categories of sense and nonsense can say about it. 3
In Plato’s Republic, Socrates argues that we esteem those things we work for more than those we are gifted.
Socrates's two examples are wealth and poetry. Inheritors don’t esteem their wealth the way the “self-made” do. Similarly, poets admire their own work (which they labor for) more than the work of others (which they inherit, as it were, but don’t create themselves).
A lousy poet prefers his or her own work to that of Homer, Virgil, and Dante.