1. I've obtained an incredible email that succinctly illustrates the dysfunctional relationship between corporations, members of Congress and the Beltway media.
I need to provide a little background first but it'll be worth it.
Follow along if interested.
2. After 1/6, dozens of major companies suspended donations to members who voted to overturn the election.
Initially the @USChamber was supportive. But this month it issued a memo arguing it was not "appropriate" to cut off funds based on the 1/6 vote
3. Instead, the @USChamber said, we should only hold accountable "those who engaged and continue to engage in repeated actions that undermine the legitimacy of our elections"
Everyone gets one free chance to undermine democracy. It's only fair!
4. Enter @nationaljournal. In an email to various corporate clients, it offers to help "Government Affairs teams and PAC leaders...successfully navigate future interactions with congressional objectors."
In other words, start giving congressional objectors money again.
@nationaljournal 5. The @nationaljournal has produced "a special in-depth report" that "analyzes the statements of all 146 congressional objectors" after 1/6
It divides them into 3 handy categories!
One is objectors that "immediately acknowledged Joe Biden as president following the violence"
@nationaljournal 6. Notice there is no category for members of Congress who EXPRESSED REGRET for their vote or CONTRITION for contributing to violence. BECAUSE NO ONE HAS.
But never mind that! This report can be YOURS for the low low price of $2,750.
7. This email really shows how Beltway media often abandons any pretense of journalism and merely produces BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE FOR CORPORATION OR LOBBYISTS.
The report is meaningless except corporations want to use it as a pretext to resume donations to objectors.
8. This report is also a scam. A team of 2 or 3 people w/basic research tools could produce this in a day. And they are charging almost $3K for access!
I charge $50/year for a year of popular.info & put more work into many individual editions
9. Of course, the issue is I'm actually trying to uncover facts and information to inform the public and not cater to the whims of corporations and their lobbyists who are apparently willing to light money on fire if it can help them continue to buy access to members of Congress
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2. Yesterday, Bloomberg reported that Rep. Blane Luetkemeyer (@RepBlaine), a powerful member of the House Financial Services Committee, told donors that "if corporations were going to put him on an enemies list, he would create a list of his own"
UPDATE: @HomeDepot is trying its best to HAVE IT BOTH WAYS on Georgia's voter suppression bills.
The Georgia Chamber said it was "in opposition" to voting restrictions and @HomeDepot told the WashPost (and me) it was "aligned" w/that
So far so good.
@HomeDepot But now @HomeDepot has contacted the Washington Post and said even though they oppose voting restrictions in Georgia THAT DOESN'T MEAN THEY OPPOSE GEORGIA'S VOTER SUPPRESSION BILLS
Huh?
@HomeDepot .@CocaCola, after telling me its position on the bills hadn't changed, told the WashPost that it was also "aligned" with the Chamber.
I'm guessing Coke would also claim that that this does not mean that they are opposed to the bills, but it's hard to say
@CocaCola 2. @HomeDepot told me yesterday that they are "aligned" with the Georgia Chamber, which issued a statement expressing “concern and opposition” to the voter suppression bills.
3. To be clear, the civil rights groups that have been pressuring the corporations do not believe this is enough. They think the Georgia Chamber statement is weak and the companies should issue their own statements definitely rejecting the bills
1. Just want to state for the record that there are plenty of women and men on Substack who are not harassing other journalists or engaged in navel gazing discussions about "cancel culture."
We are trying to produce meaningful independent journalism and writing.