This is a reminder that Donald Trump spent over a year demonizing a "China" virus, along with other even more vicious terms.
The GOP leadership in Congress and the states let that stand--and in many cases amplified the hate....1/
2/ Last March I wrote in The Atlantic that such rhetoric has a long, fatal history. I was thinking of public health measures: historically labeling a disease as Chinese (or Jewish, or whatever) leads often to taking the wrong actions, or none at all, to respond to an outbreak...
3/ I didn't stop to consider the immediate threat of anti-Asian hate, though my historical example, early 1900s outbreaks in Honolulu and then San Francisco of the global bubonic plague pandemic, certainly provide plenty of examples of exactly that...
4/ Now we're 2 days out from the brutal events in Atlanta, a massacre of some of the most vulnerable in the Asian community there. We are being reminded of a story that's been out there, but not top-of-mainstream-media-mind: the increase in anti-Asian violence over the last year.
5/ The last sentence of that 3/2020 piece said that putting a lid on bigoted anti-China rhetoric on the pandemic was a matter of life and death; it was–at least some failures in the Trump/GOP response to the virus derive from the urge to other it in their vision of American life.
6/ But none of us can now evade the fact that it is life and death in the most immediate sense: the climate of hate created by Trump and Republican rhetoric is doing what persuasive rhetoric always does: drive some of its hearers to take actions: crimes of hate and violence...
7/ Unless and until those in leadership in the GOP who do not deploy racist tropes, (from their hearts or simply expediently, given the current tendency in the party, it doesn't matter) make such ready hate anathema, neither they nor the country can be redeemed.
/fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm here to say that the last four years diminished me. I've spent that time in a defensive crouch, fight or flight too much of the time, with COVID over the last year shrinking social connection; I'm less kind, I fear, and narrower in my thinking....1/
2/ I'd hoped, knowing that hope was foolish, that all that would discernibly fall away at noon yesterday. And, yeah, stuff changed; I could feel that change myself.
But four years of fear and anger and, lately, loneliness don't just evaporate...
3/ So the joy I want to feel in the real change, the real hope that I did see beginning to unfold yesterday ain't there yet, and isn't, ISTM, likely to blossom fully for a while.
I want to be happier for my wife and kid, dammit...and it ain't close to all there yet...
@curiouswavefn Rhodes, yes. Pinker, not for me; I find him conventionally contrarian and I am in the minority that does not find his style to my taste.
My list would a) change depending on what I'm thinking about and with the passing of years and b) would be eclectic...
@curiouswavefn For example. It would likely include Middlemarch, MacLean's A River Runs Through It, Heschel's The Sabbath and Seth's The Golden Gate, all of which had a real impact at the point when I read them. Shroedinger's What Is Life would be on the list at least some of the time...
@curiouswavefn Guy Davenport's The Geography of the Imagination and Kenner's The Pound Era make me think every time I dig into them. Lewis Thomas's Lives of a Cell opened my eyes to ways of seeing and writing; so did Didion's Slouching Towards Bethlehem. Pilgrim at Tinker Creek doesn't...
It really is fascinating watching every Republican office holder ignore the fact that they personally and their party have uttelry failed their biggest test: 220,000 Americans and counting have died on their watch--and their actions have steadily made that toll worse.
1/
2/ Most important; it's not just individuals who bear the blame, though FSM knows they do, from @realDonaldTrump on down. Republicanism itself has failed. Its core, default ideas have been tried and found wanting. No. Private enterprise didn't get PPE to hospitals in time...
3/ No: individual choice in the face of a collective emergency won't keep people safe. No: crony capitalism really does impede the response to a crisis. No: public health--socialized medical response--is vital to the security of the US. No: viruses don't care about your racism...
Got an email from @nytimes, and I'm reminded that the problem w. elite coverage of US political life is systemic, not bad individual actors. @llerer is ot a bad reporter. But when she says "“ I do think voters like to know what they’re getting with a candidate..."
1/
2/ Lerer complains that "I’m not sure this convention answered that question”--what policies Biden would advance, beyond simply being not-Trump.
There are at least 2 problems with this. 1 is that she acknowledges that Warren, Bill Clinton and Biden addressed exactly that...
3/ I mean--when Biden himself tells you what he's going to do, echoing many others who talked about everything from child care to climate change (and pandemic response!) it seems like willed ignorance to say that the DNC audience doesn't know what they would get w. a Biden win...
Just read an @radioopensource email on their "cancel culture" program in which Yale professor David Bromwich displayed a level of historical illiteracy that made me wonder if Clio herself appeared to whomp him upside the head.
Quote and exegesis to follow 1/
2/ Here's the quote: "Bromwich says...that universities are on the way to becoming much less free than they were 'let’s say from 1945 to 1995 or 2000 or so. Universities were the freest part of American life for all those years . . . places like U. of Chicago, Yale, UCLA, U MI."
3/ Lemme tell you (and Professor Bromwich) a story. In 1951, UC Berkeley wanted to hire my father, Joseph R. Levenson, w. his new Ph.D. in Chinese history. His name had to be hidden from the CA legislature. Why? Because he'd been one of John Fairbank's students...
Unfortunately, the US political system, beginning with the Constitution, is not built to respond to, handle, and/or deal with an irregular, asymmetric, and unconventional insider threat...
2/ "that recognizes no authority other than that of their own power and sees every law, rule, norm, and tradition solely as a means to obtain power, maintain power, expand power, or direct power to reward allies and punish opponents....
3/ "The President’s actions; those of his two primary protectors Attorney General Barr and Senator McConnell; those of his other protectors like new DNI Ratcliffe, former Acting DNI Grennell, the Republican caucuses in the Senate and the House, the Republican governors...