1 of 10/ ROCE vs Well IRRs and the Path Back for Old Energy
Since the shale revolution, there is a massive disconnect between promised well-level IRRs and actual, corporate-level returns on capital employed (ROCE) for the oil industry.
2/ Oil producers promised 30%-50%+ well IRRs at seemingly conservative oil prices (<$50/bbl). Over the previous 5 and 10 years, WTI averaged $51 and $68/bbl. Corresponding median ROCE for Old Energy averaged +0.6% and 3.9%. What the heck!?!
3/ Why the crazy big gap? It appears that numerous ongoing costs were not reconciled including for acreage, infrastructure, less successful drilling, DUC builds, etc. Why ignore so many costs? I have no explanation.
4/ Historically, the Major Oils were known as the better ROCE companies that prioritized corporate returns and dividends over the “drill-baby-drill” mentality of most E&Ps. The Majors were the “real” comanies that long only PMs could get behind.
5/ In the US, we are down to just two traditional Majors, one of which is under duress, and in Europe they all want to become “Energie Transition” heros. This has left a void of disciplined, returns-focused Old Energy mega caps in the US and globally.
6/ The good news is there is a new group of US-based Old Energy managements that recognize the failure of the “Well IRR” model. One, $EOG, has long been an ROCE leader; I credit its former CEO Forrest Hoglund with educating me on the subject at a 1993 analyst meting.
7/ Over 1991-2003, median Old Energy ROCE averaged over 12%. Including the super spike period (i.e., thru 2008) boosts that to 14.5%. Point being, higher ROCE is possible and does not require a new super cycle.
8/ It remains my view that Old Energy ROCE reached a generational trough in 2020 and that a new, multi-year ROCE improvement cycle may be at hand.
9/ The pushback: E&Ps have never in 150 years remained disciplined. I agree. But I do think a new group of companies across all facets of the sector are capable of significantly improved ROCE, consistent with what the former Majors achieved.
10 LAST/ I see the growing likelihood of new Climate policies/regs as being supportive of Old Energy ROCE. Old Energy needs to be part of the Climate solution and I reject the idea that addressing Climate concerns is definitionally negative for Old Energy ROCE.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1 of 15/ Bubble psychology from the perspective of a retired stock analyst
When you first make a big call as an analyst, the doubters come out en masse as you are going against the overwhelming consensus. Initially, you are way right and everyone else is wrong. Then it switches.
2/ In 2004, we first published our call that oil could rise to a sustained $50-$80 range, a time everyone KNEW oil would never stay over $25. Many thought oil would only reach $50 if Saudi collapsed, after which the world economy would sink. Oil blew through $50 without calamity.
3/ In 2004, everyone had a 1970s mindset on what would cause oil to spike and and a ‘90s mindset on what would follow. Recency bias, anchoring, and a bunch of related terms were operating in full force. The market was willing to assume away an entire structural move. Bad idea.
As someone who called a then coming super-spike era for oil markets in 2004, but failed to get off in 2008 until well into the downturn, the current innovation/Bubble stock gurus seem to be making many of the same mistakes I made.
2/ The idea that your favorite innovation/Bubble stock never discounted 0-1% Treasuries is as dumb as when I said oil equities weren’t discounting $140 and “only” $90-$100/bbl (or something like that). The market is almost certainly discounting better conditions than you realize.
3/ The idea that we were using “conservative” normalized assumptions for oil equities I sincerely thought was true. However, it didn’t matter. When you are toward the end of massive bull market, no one else is using conservative assumptions.
1 of6/ Energy S&P 500 weight and the path back to respectability.
For most of my 30 year career, Energy has been 8%-15% of the SPX. This cycle it troughed below 2%, less than Utilities or Materials, rendering Old Energy irrelevant for generalist PMs.
2/ With the sharp recovery from pre-vaccine lows last October, Energy is now back through 3% and above Utes and Materials. Unlike the latter 2 sectors, Energy has a history of a much more sizable SPX weight.
3/ As Old Energy recovers, I don’t think it can or will remain ignored. In the same way we had a massive fundamental and momentum overshoot on the downside, structurally better ROCE can combine with renewed interest to take it back up.