Strongly disagree with this entire piece as a factual matter. The border has been “surging” with single adults (who made up 72% of all apprehensions last month) since Title 42 in spring 2020, and family apprehensions remain <50% of 2019. The evidence for the thesis is missing!
Last month, 100,000 people were encountered at the border and 72,000 of them were single adults, almost all of whom were expelled. Single adult apprehensions have been spiking since spring 2020 and that FACT is literally *not mentioned once* in this piece. That actively misleads.
Also, where the heck does this number come from, tossed into the public like a bomb with no sourcing, not even "anonymous officials."?

To reach 2 million, we'd need to see an average 182,111 encounters a month for the next 10 months straight. That has *literally never happened.*
The record year for border apprehensions is 2000, when 1,610,243 people were apprehended.

Only three months of that year—January to March—had more than 182,111 apprehensions.

So ten months of that straight? A prediction that should have raised big red flags before publishing.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Aaron Reichlin-Melnick

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ReichlinMelnick

19 Mar
Here's some facts for Rep. Crenshaw.

- The ACAs were suspended in March 2020. Biden terminating did not change a thing.

- Remain in Mexico enriched the cartels by creating a jobs program for kidnappers and torturers. Easily 1 in 10 people subject to it—or more—were victimized.
Rep. Crenshaw's claim that terminating the Asylum Cooperative Agreements affected the border is unmoored from reality.

The only ACA to go into effect was suspended in March 2020 due to the pandemic—and fewer than 1,000 people had ever been subject to it.

I'd like @DanCrenshawTX to take 7 minutes and watch this video from 2019 where a woman subject to Remain in Mexico describes being kidnapped and hearing her husband being tortured, and likely killed.

What he praises was a conveyor belt for inhumanity.

Read 4 tweets
18 Mar
Having read the article, it's clear that J.D. Vance knows literally nothing about immigration, just the fevered talked points that ping around the Fox News ecosystem. This entire thing is ridiculous posturing designed to align him more towards the Trumpist anti-immigrant wing.
None of @JDVance1's claims are true. No one is being "invited" in. The Biden administration is shouting to the rooftops that people shouldn't come now.

But guess what? Desperation is a powerful motivator for people wanting a better life, just like it was for Vance's ancestors.
This entire thing is just mindless shallow talking point after mindless shallow talking point.

He seriously argues that we shouldn't pass a path to citizenship for undocumented immigrants—something two thirds of Americans support—until we, what, defeat the cartels? So... never?
Read 6 tweets
17 Mar
This morning @AliMayorkas is appearing in front of the House Homeland Security Committee for the first time as Secretary.

I'll be following along here for the first hour or so! Like the last four years, expect almost everything to be about the border.

homeland.house.gov/activities/hea…
There appears to be a major sound problem with the hearing, and we can't hear a thing from Chairman Thompson as he gives his opening statement. No sound on either the Youtube livestream or the C-Span livestream. Not an auspicious start to things!
Anyway, even though we can't hear Chairman @BennieGThompson give his opening statement, here's a link to the prepared remarks. Still unclear if this is a tech issue or if he just forgot to unmute himself? homeland.house.gov/imo/media/doc/…
Read 48 tweets
9 Mar
The first lawsuit filed against the enforcement priorities memo comes from the Florida AG's office, which makes it all the way to paragraph 6 before telling an outright lie.
Here's the motion for a preliminary injunction in Florida's lawsuit against the enforcement priorities.

Like the Texas lawsuit, it absolutely mangles immigration law to make mandatory what has always been discretionary.

courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Florida's attempt to throw out Biden's new enforcement priorities has been assigned to District Judge Charlene Honeywell, an Obama appointee, and to Magistrate Judge Sean Flynn, a Trump appointee.
Read 6 tweets
9 Mar
FAIR goes into full meltdown over Venezuelan TPS.

I particularly like the part where they scream in all caps that TPS is supposed to last "maybe a few months"—when by law initial TPS designations must be 6-18 months long and Congress fully authorized extending designations.
This tweet is also hilariously incoherent. The law requires that a person seeking TPS benefits have been "continuously physically present in the United States since the effective date of the most recent designation of that state."

So FAIR thinks Biden should have broken the law?
Also totally incoherent is this tweet, which claims that asylum is a "temporary protection" (it's not, it's a path to citizenship) for people "to work for positive change back home," which, huh?

Do they think people granted asylum are required to be human rights advocates?
Read 4 tweets
5 Mar
This is an important step towards creating a headquarters-level review of ICE decisions.

Getting national policies to stick at the local level is always hard, so this escalation process is vital to ensuring that the new priorities don't just get shrugged off.
Here is the site for the new "ICE Case Review (ICR) process" for those who are not an ICE priority anymore.

Advocates/immigrants are asked to first contact the local ICE office and only escalate through the ICE Case Review afterwards.

ice.gov/ICEcasereview
The site for the new ICE Case Review process says that "cases involving individuals detained in ICE custody or pending imminent removal will be prioritized."

So if local ICE isn't budging on a case that's no longer a priority, give this new HQ escalation process a try!
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!