Thread by @ImpairedCRONIC

Because there was more then a Climate Change decision made today

I went looking
Yes it is for Organized Crime ( a low bar) only. And they did take some time to change some wording

The Conservatives still want to weaken our justice system by reversing onus of guilt

It appears the work the Liberal have started in restoring our lost Vaccine Production, preparedness, would continue if the Conservatives are ever elected

3 strike rule for Politicians

Too bad it wasn't for the Party, we would never have to hear from the Cons again

Not sure I like a Bureaucrat deciding whether an Elected person should be in Parliament.
A single person doing it too, is ripe for abuse

Don't trust this one bit

Mainly because of who is bringing it to the table

Sure, but is it needed?
I don't know

https://twitter.com/JeremyAppel1025/status/1373359323175297032?s=20

So I guess this means, they will not be closing Offices this time. Creating an enormous backlog that we are still dealing with today

Could they have possibly learned something here

I do like this

Finally get some decent equipment into the Military's hands

No reason for any Party not to steal this, as far as I'm concerned

But they are already.

Which then is a cause for concern for me, on where they are going with this

As we have seen with the GST cut, Conservatives are willing to provide themselves less funding. So then their excuses for Cuts are more palatable

I thought I might make it through it all but I'm getting bored

I'll show a couple more I found interesting

The link for anyone who wants them all cpc20assets.s3.us-west-2.amazonaws.com/wp-content/upl…

It worries me, who they would have to define the infractions

I swear this was close, only because it references the Environment

As long as we find nothing useful there, we are willing to Protect it

That is what this is saying to me (I know that doesn't mean that I'm right)

So in principal this could possibly be all undone

On going Fisheries disputes

Which to be fair is no different from now

They have moved from "Defund The CBC"

To "Let's give it a slow death"

Because it worked out so well the last time they sped up Pipelines 🙄

Oh, and Oil to Refineries that cannot refine it

The Liberals did not complete it on Time

However, the actions they did take. Were enough to make other Parties pay attention and adopt

If nothing else (ignoring the advisories lifted) this makes the Liberals actions. Worthy of SOME praise

I'm a No for this, from any Party really

Mainly because of this phys.org/news/2020-01-c…

But also realize that isn't going to happen.

The World will just keep sticking their head in the Ground over waste issues with this I guess

I don't know why they keep saying Gov't is using EI monies, they're not

A Year for Critical illness Yeaah

Same old Rate Booo

Income Splitting to promote having Children

Funny, I tend to think being able to afford to have one would be a better incentive.

And I have a hard time seeing Taxes, making up that affordability

The Party of smaller Government

More Bureaucrats 🤔

They just had to put China in there

It's not like this isn't already happening
But the sentiment is sound

So maybe they can lie about the Liberals wanting to do this again, this election 🤷‍♂️

Let's not attempt to make Retirement an actual achievable Goal
No, lets keep them working until they drop on their employers floor. And a Tax Break for doing so

Half way through

I know I said I would stop, but I keep screwing my self by scrolling ahead. 50 more pages then

Screw environmental assessments, because it worked out so well the last time 🙄

But I guess, this will help in continuing the Government that comes after them, is responsible for their Failures 🙄

LOL, the Conservatives are concerned with this
The Conservatives that still have a large contingent of Harperites

As much as this needs to be done, I'm not holding my Breath on the Conservatives actually accomplishing it

Another continuation of policy that is already happening

Another, "Why not" policy

Shout Out, to my Feeling here, with a dash of "Why not/kind of sad we didn't keep up. Just instinctively"

https://twitter.com/ImpairedCRONIC/status/1373485460778053634?s=20

So another one, where I'm concerned about who is setting the standard

1 of the Sentiments that is there is reasonable (national security). The other leaves a concern of standards. Are they willing to accept to have to pay more for one, or maybe wait a little longer for a devmt

So in 2020 you could get up to 57% of your donation to a Charity between the Feds/Provinces

The Cons wants to make Charity D equal to Political D.

I wonder why 🤔

Could it be some of their most predominate Pamphleteering Organizations. Are registered as Charities? CaN't Be

They just couldn't let it go

Even though, it is no longer relevant apparently cbc.ca/news/politics/…

A part of me wants to hear what they would have pitched, to maintain this. Purely for Comedic purposes

No more Government owned Pipelines?

Because it is not going t happen, just because of Red Tape

And in fact, some can argue. The Red Tape is what is making further development palatable to Investors

ALL ABOARD

Before this is even a thought. Another, Why not

How extreme is that 4%

Not even a reasonable Inch

And I just stumbled onto the best Conservative slogan, ever

"Don't expect Us to keep track of this. But Trust Us, we know it is alot"

I know, Generalizations for policy is best, but first thoughts can't be helped

This is just kind of sad that any Party, would have to go through this process. For what seems like basic editing

This still exists, why drop it?

Is this the Conservative Way of appealing to the Youth Vote?canada.ca/en/services/be…

Okay?

I don't know how this is bad aside from the Colonizer argument
Even with that. This seems like a good Idea

Conservatives do acknowledge Progress 🙄

Again another thing, that had triggers. And it shows in the vote

Weird, aside from the MMIW perspective

Hard to deny, once accumulated on a list after all

I've dragged this out for 4 hours

And I'm 10 pages from the end

And if I didn't already see a tweet to link for the last one

I would have stopped

Anyway, onward

Ehhhh, the absolute most ridiculous, confusing blurb since Legalization

Is finally getting removed

Again saddened any Party has to go through this. For what seems to be basic editing

And yet, you can't ignore 23%.

🤷‍♂️

That 5% that voted against, what I assume is a name Change

Truly belongs with the PPC/Mavericks

Let's update that to 9%

Yep 9% is the max Number

And I leave the last comment to others

Aside from the Conservatives are completely on Board with what is here

https://twitter.com/rjjago/status/1373309233312186372?s=20