I have been thinking about how Jeff Immelt—who I remember being interviewed by Bill Hybels at the 2014 Global Leadership Summit (vimeo.com/128173175)—ended up not being a successful CEO of G.E. (). Do we listen to people prematurely? Or was he unlucky?
"This person is successful! They are CEO of a large company! Learn about leadership from them!"
7 years later: "This person took their company into the ground. They had repeated poor judgment and execution and integrity! I would not trust what they have to say!"
Lesson here?
I learned a lot about leadership from Jack Welch, Jeff Immelt's predecessor ... at least I think I did. Or did Welch just get lucky?
Fame and success can be fleeting!
You shouldn't name something after someone who is still alive because they still have time to disappoint you.
G.E. was known as the premier leadership and management development corporation under Jack Welch in 2001. But sixteen years later, it was seen as a disappointment—destroyed by bad leadership and management. Was the reputation wrong? Or were they just unlucky? How the mighty fall!
Who do we put on a pedestal and say: "Listen to them?" I am not cynical about hearing the opinions of the seemingly successful and accomplished. I'm interested in what they have to say. But I have also seen enough rapid descents to take what they say with a grain of salt.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Vyacheslav Volodin is who Franklin Graham met with in March 2019. He has been sanctioned by the US and EU since 2014 for the Ukraine invasion. Volodin spews lies—suggesting Germany poisoned Alexei Navalny and that those arrested for the Capitol violence are political prisoners.
Franklin Graham said he believed Trump about Trump's questioning of the results of the election and then Graham said that the violence at the Capitol was from Antifa.
On why dieting and exercise and trying to look good and be fit and thin may not have as much to do with excellence as having a paunch, serving others, taking walks, and eating meals with people.
I have been reading about diets and people trying to lose weight. Apparently almost any diet "works" the first two weeks if you haven't been eating carefully.
BUT then it is slow (and therefore harder to stay with).
AND regular bingeing on deprivation hurts your body long-term.
From a Christian perspective, trying to "look good" is not really something we're supposed to be focused on. We are specifically told in the New Testament not to worry about nice clothing, fashionable hairstyles, jewelry, or impressive physical exercise.
Five thoughts on New Year's Resolutions: 1. There are so many good habits we could implement but there are too many for anyone to do all of them well. (See my list in the thread below). So we should be gracious with ourselves and others.
2. The vast majority of our resolutions get drowned out by the noise of life. Life defies discipline and clarity. Life defies planning and organization.
3. As I see the struggles with alcohol and depression, and reports of suicide, and deaths from covid-19, I'm reminded that getting through everyday life—eating, working, relationships, cleaning up, functioning, adulting, surviving—is something to be grateful for.
Regarding the latest @CTmagazine cover story, christianitytoday.com/ct/2021/januar… my colleagues Jeannine Brown and Mark Strauss @BethelSeminary are on the NIV Bible translation committee. (Yes, Wayne Grudem taught undergraduates at @BethelU from 1977-1981, as did John Piper from 1974-1980).
- Millard Erickson taught at @BethelSeminary from 1969-1984.
- Tom Schreiner also taught at Bethel Seminary from 1986-1997.
Greg Boyd taught theology to undergraduates at Bethel University for 16 years from 1987-2003. He founded Woodland Hills Church in 1992. reknew.org/2018/06/podcas…
After finishing the helpful, and highly acclaimed, "Jesus and John Wayne" by @kkdumez, I'm thinking about the style of the book from a publishing perspective—what has made this book so successful?
- It is brief and dense so it is efficient. That is, readers get a feeling that they are learning quickly. It has been diligently edited to be concise. It keeps the attention of the reader used to reading Twitter or watching YouTube or The Crown or listening to podcasts.
- There is less analysis in the sense of "on the one hand, on the other hand." Instead of telling, there is showing—with example after example, and quote after quote. The effect is the takeaway that this Christian masculinity was not just one person but an ideological movement.