The Guardian, which has managed for decades to avoid paying corporation tax, despite sheltering a billion pound asset sale in the Caymans, claimed £100,000 in furlough funds. theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/m…
At Guido we didn't furlough anyone, or make anyone redundant, we weathered the pandemic out of reserves and actually increased headcount. No taxpayers are harmed in the production of Guido.
The Guardian receives millions in subsidies from foundations established by billionaires to push their agendas. Do not believe for one second the nonsense pushed by the Guardian that it is free of the influence of billionaires.
Apart from the millions laundered through the foundations of billionaires every year to subsidise the loss making Guardian, they're "free from political influence".
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Am enjoying the hypocrisy of the situation where this photo is going to be running on US TV networks and, so far, the British media are looking the other way.
No one is saying they should not be allowed to give their views, we’re just asking that their affiliations should be clearly labelled. As the BBC's own guidelines state they should be.
From @Channel4News Alex T asks Hancock, in so many words, "Are you a granny killing sociopath?" Can't think why C4 News can't get ministers on the show.
Hancock did well to not lose his temper. The question was directed to the CMO as well, Hancock just answered that the thrust of the question was obviously untrue. Moved on without taking a follow-up. Unsurprisingly given the crassness.
Here's the clip, judge for yourself was it a crass question, or a genuine fact finding effort: