Yes, I know people like this. And I worry about them. Who would have thought, irrationality and science going hand in hand? COVID absolutism is its own kind of fanaticism. If you're going to believe in something (and everyone believes in *something*) this is one of the options
Then there are more normal examples of COVID absolutism. In weeks when daily cases were only *50* in a city of half a million, I knew young people with no health conditions who refused to do outdoor dining without a mask
The misinformation around indoor dining was interesting as well, where people would act like it was the most dangerous thing imaginable. To my knowledge, very few (if any?) DC restaurants closed down in recent months due to tracers finding indoor transmission as the source
COVID shaming gives people a sense of a control (and moral superiority to boot) when everything otherwise seems out of control. So it's not about science, to be fair, but about creating structure, meaning, and coherence
This is why COVID absolutism is often itself a form of extreme individualism, rather than communalism as was first assumed. What is more individualistic than the belief in complete personal agency, that bad outcomes can be forestalled through sheer force of will?
"Conventional wisdom is that [US] couldn't lock down properly due to its excessive individualism. But interviews with a broad swath of lockdown skeptics suggest the opposite: lockdown skeptics are less individualistic" freebeacon.com/coronavirus/th…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Over the last two decades, America witnessed its sharpest decline in church membership in recorded history. Secularists hoped that religious decline would make for a more rational politics. That didn't happen. Be careful what you wish for.
In my work on pluralism and living with deep difference, I keep returning to the Dutch theologian Abraham Kuyper. He argued that all strongly held ideologies were effectively faith-based, and that no human being could survive long without a "pivot."
If deeply felt conviction is sublimated religion, then this has major implications. In my @TheAtlantic article, I cite the political theorist @SWGoldman who calls this "the law of the conservation of religion"
Thrilled to announce a new feature as part of the growing @WCrowdsLive family. We've launched The Democracy Essays, curated by political philosopher @sckimbriel and TNR staff writer @OsitaNwanevu. They have free rein.
Here's @sckimbriel first essay for @WCrowdsLive—"What is Democracy For?" It's fascinating and incisive like few things I've seen online and gives a taste of some of the questions they'll be exploring. wisdomofcrowds.live/what-is-democr…
One of our preoccupations at @WCrowdsLive has been the question of democracy as a means to other things we hold dear or an end unto itself. This is our attempt to explore these questions in a more systematic and exploratory way.
In the second half of this @WCrowdsLive episode, I test out a new argument on the relationship between democracy, accountability, free will, and the problem of evil
The first part of the episode is a bit lighter where I explain why keto is "the Islam of diets." It's seemingly strict on the outside, but if you're willing to buy into the basic structure, you end up having "freedom within constraint"
And then in a very special bonus episode for subscribers, I interview @dmarusic on his past life as a punk rock drummer touring America in a dilapidated bus.
The Markle interview is a landmark post-Trump moment. Hard to imagine it dominating our national or social media attention to such an extent if Trump was still president.
The more I think about it, the more I think it's pretty remarkable. Not thinking about Trump or being asked to think about him frees up an incredible amount of mental and emotional space. Sometimes the space is empty. I've noticed more and more people saying that they're bored.
Clubhouse is another embodiment of the new era. Trump barely comes up in conversation. Instead, people spend hours talking about foreign policy or go whale moaning—things which had declined in importance in the preceding 4 years.
Whether Trump or Obama was worse on the Middle East isn't a question with an obvious answer. My view is that Trump's was worse in intent but Obama's was worse in effect, mostly because Obama had to respond to the Arab Spring where Trump didn't.
If Trump was in charge during Arab Spring, he would have been terrible. He likely would have doubled down on dictators, but perhaps that would've still been better than what Obama did, which was the worst of both worlds, telling Arabs he was with them and then betraying them.
Across Western Europe, and not just France or Austria, there are aggressive and often government-backed efforts to stigmatize Muslim voices by assuming that anyone who's religiously conservative is an "Islamist"
France isn't the worst case in Europe, although it appears Macron is doing his best to reach the heights of the Austrian crackdown. This @foreignpolicy article captures it quite well: "Austria, not France, is the model for Europe's crackdown on Islamists" foreignpolicy.com/2020/11/11/aus…
I believe anti-woke is the right position in U.S. politics. And it's my position. But I do wish anti-woke voices were more vocal about defending the liberties of Muslims in Europe who, in a much more literal sense, are being canceled—their homes raided and their assets frozen