Christians who are opposed to critical theory as an ideology should make every effort to understand it. Yelling ‘Marxism’ whenever we hear the word ‘oppression’ or ‘privilege’ is neither irenic nor charitable.
Do not shut down conversations on race or gender. Be committed to confronting and uprooting injustice, and show love and compassion to those who experience it. Be willing to listen, willing to learn, and willing to accept correction.
Read primary sources by critical scholars; don’t rely on secondary sources (like this one!) as the only source of your information.
Second, Christians who are sympathetic to critical theory need to make sure they have thought through its theological implications carefully.
Opposition to racism and sexism does not require the acceptance of critical theory. We dare not ‘baptize’ secular thinking under the naive assumption that it will fit seamlessly into a Christian worldview.
God and His word need to be the ultimate standard by which all ideas, philosophies, doctrines, and claims are judged (2 Cor. 10:5).
Third, critical theory is an attempt to redress injustices that have been committed throughout history and which are still being committed today.
This is a worthy goal, for both Christians and non-Christians. Yet critical theory is based on the flawed premise that ‘oppression’ is our fundamental problem as human beings. It isn’t. Sin is our fundamental problem.
Oppressed people and their oppressors are all sinners who need forgiveness and salvation.
While Christians should absolutely work for the cause of temporal justice, we can never forget that our greatest need is the satisfaction of divine justice through the redemptive work...
...of Jesus Christ. Let us commit to making the good news of Jesus’ life, death, and resurrection the non-negotiable center of our message. If we lose the gospel, we lose everything.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Praying for our Asian neighbors and those in the family of Christ. Similar to the black experience, yours is more complex and multi-layered than any headline or tweet can grasp.
So when black and brown bodies aren’t at the center stories of injustice and hatred, I try to ask myself, “What would I want to hear in these moments? What would encourage me? What would give me hope?”
I can’t speak for everyone, but I’m rarely moved by the sincere...
...hashtags, laments, and outrage on our behalf.
Well-meaning DMs offering comfort as if I lost a loved one produce shame, especially when the families of victims are experiencing loss that is very real and near, knowing they’ll continue to mourn for months and years to come.
The logic that says, "vote = culpability" is the lie that evangelicals have been telling Black Christians for decades, and last week the chickens came home to roost.
Simply voting for Trump doesn't make a Christian anymore culpable for last week's events than voting democrat makes a Christian culpable for abortions in America.
Culpability requires more than just voting — it requires inappropriate allegiance, blind loyalty and denial, and the justification of or participation in wicked acts to retain power and comfort. Culpability requires direct or indirect compromise.
I'm skeptical of any Black leader whose message seems to completely alleviate White people OR Black people of responsibility or self-reflection regarding racism, American history, or human agency.
A Black leader who takes pride in being viewed as "exceptional" by White conservatives or pitied as a "helpless victim" by White progressives is the enemy of a truly united America.
A Black Christian leader who makes much of CRT but little of Christian nationalism is either naive or self-serving.
We’re not stupid. CRT critics have successfully demonized any and everyone who has anything substantive to say about racism/justice. The only answer they’ll accept is “the Gospel” but can do entire podcasts about supporting political candidates and how to think about abortion.
For a CRT critic to say, “We need to talk about racism” but never model how to talk about it biblically is telling. The real goal is to end this conversation using the same tactics used in the 60s. Shame.
As far as CRT goes, if we believe in common grace, it’s okay for people to benefit from perceived truths as long as that “truth” doesn’t contradict scripture. Some find CRT helpful, fine! I don’t need it but I will not condemn any Christian who engages it wisely.
I don’t comment a lot about controversial issues on social due to the platforms limitations for productive dialogue. But the response to the *anything but unequivocal celebration to to the Botham’s brother forgiveness* concerns me enough to comment briefly.
1. I was deeply moved by the brother’s act of forgiveness. It’s one of the most beautiful things I’ve witnessed. I thank God for the work he’s doing in that brother’s life and I pray the Lord uses it to show himself, not only to Amber, but to the millions that witnessed it.
2. On the one hand, I trust and rest in the Lord’s providence regarding Amber’s sentence. God knows, he cares, and he’s the final judge and jury of how she spends the coming years.
I still love this post. This captures what sets his take apart from other articles:
"...when I look back at my older writings, I see them as contributing more to a particular partisan narrative than to a tough, clear-eyed search for truth."
1/5 My confession: From 2014-2016, as my thinking was evolving on social justice due to fresh perspectives, I wrongly overreacted to the reality of some drifting left and drifted too far right. Two years ago, I would have signed the Statement on Social Justice.
2/5 Just as I perceived those on the far left contributing to, in the words of David French, a particular partisan narrative, I did the exact same thing for a different tribe. By God's grace, this became clear through the guidance of "clear-eyed" mentors.