Supreme Court takes up United States v. Tsarnaev, which vacated the Boston bomber's capital sentence. Takes no action on Dobbs, the challenge to Mississippi's 15-week abortion ban. supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…
Chief Justice Roberts wants to dramatically narrow (really, I think, eviscerate) the Antiquities Act, which presidents use to shield environmentally sensitive land, including underwater areas, from development, pollution, and other industrial activities. supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…
Sotomayor and Gorsuch nudge the Sentencing Commission to clarify the availability of a sentencing reduction for defendants who request a suppression hearing (like, for illegally obtained evidence) but also tell prosecutors they're pleading guilty.
I find it hard to disagree with Sotomayor's dissent from denial of cert in this alarming case where the judge *excluded the public from the courtroom during a criminal trial* so he could issue a major evidentiary ruling behind closed doors. supremecourt.gov/orders/courtor…
The opinions in today's orders have now been published separately.
Lucy is feeling a bit better but the vet says her wound is infected, swollen, and not yet improving. We are hoping the antibiotics will turn things around within the next few days.🤞
In other animal news, Bianca (as we’ve named her) survived the night and has markedly improved this morning. She’s eating and drinking and chirping to Limo and Loro (who are fascinated and confused), which we take as an encouraging sign.
Lucy, who only recently stopped whining when we paid attention to Limo and Loro, is not yet mentally prepared to process Bianca’s existence, and we’re all OK with that.
The Heritage Foundation’s Zack Smith, arguing against DC statehood, says DC residents “already impact the national debate” because members of Congress see their yard signs while driving to work.
Here is Republican Rep. Jody Hice arguing against D.C. statehood because it doesn’t have a landfill, airport, or car dealership (actually, it does have a car dealership).
One of the reasons Republicans dress up their arguments against D.C. statehood in legalese is because otherwise they sound racist, partisan, or painfully stupid. slate.com/news-and-polit…
A dog bit Lucy’s leg yesterday which led to a midnight visit to the emergency vet. She has puncture wounds and an infection and she’s in a lot of pain but is on track for recovery. If anyone has tips for suffering dogs besides the puppy narcotics they gave us I’m all ears.
She’s just standing around moaning and whining from the pain 🙁
We have also given her CBD oil and it helps to a point, mostly to calm her down, but she’s definitely still suffering.
🚨D.C. Circuit Judge Silberman just released a truly wild dissent calling on the Supreme Court to overturn New York Times v. Sullivan, claiming NYT and WaPo are "virtually Democratic Party broadsheets," and accusing "big tech" of censoring conservatives. cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opini…
Judge Silberman explicitly attacks Twitter for restricting the New York Post's Hunter Biden laptop story, complains that "there are serious efforts to muzzle Fox News," and writes that "Democratic Party ideological control" of the media is "a threat to a viable democracy."
Silberman's final footnote: "The reasons for press bias are too complicated to address here. But they surely relate to bias at academic institutions." Doesn't elaborate. cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opini…
This is a fantastic article on the sweeping consequences of the Washington Supreme Court's recent decision striking down the state law that had criminalized drug possession. It's great to see progressive state courts bending the arc of justice. courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/9…
It's a fascinating decision—the law punished individuals who *did not know and had no reason to know* they possessed drugs. The defendant alleged, quite plausibly, that she had borrowed a pair of jeans from a friend without realizing the coin pocket contained a tiny bag of drugs.
The Washington Supreme Court, which is the most diverse high court in the country, ruled that the state constitution's due process guarantee prohibited the legislature from criminalizing "innocent conduct—or, more accurately, nonconduct." So it struck down the entire statute.