I’ve lived 80% of my life in Russia and 20% in the UK. Both countries have some strange or unpleasant aspects. (For example, one of them poisons its own citizens with a nerve agent.)
Neither of them has news reports every other week about some random person shooting up a store.
The most fascinating to me is that while there seems to be majority support for stricter laws, there’s also majority opposition to e.g. outright banning handguns. I’m perplexed as to what kind of experiences one needs to have to be convinced that weapons with bullets are needed.
I know some people say guns are their hobby. My thinking process is, like, maybe you could pick a different hobby? How about making bombs, is that a reasonable hobby too?
Though a designated park where people who like to shoot can hang out with each other seems like an OK idea.
Someone mentioned stabbings in UK but then deleted. The “nice” thing about stabbings is that unless you’re dealing with a specially trained assassin, you can’t be stabbed while running away. This adds a natural limit on how many people can get stabbed at the same time.
To me, the problem with guns is the same as with bombs. They work remotely. The normal intuition that you can keep distance with a suspicious person or try to run away doesn’t apply. They’re like a cheat code. Of course all violence is bad but I prefer direct contact.
Re: cops. Ideally I wouldn’t want them to have access to lethal weapons either. Just some kind of stun weapons that paralyze the person for a few days as a last resort. Idk how that would work, maybe this exists already? I don’t get why you’d want a cop to be able to murder.
If temporarily paralyzing weapons in the hands of cops sound terrifying, imagine how bad it would be if they had weapons that could literally END YOUR LIFE? Oh wait that’s what we have now.
Anyway, look at this “tech” guy (me) thinking about solving problems with “tech”, it’s really something isn’t it. How is this website free
narrator: they run ads
Someone should tell Americans that video games exist
If you really like guns why can’t you just play Fortnite. It has many guns. They periodically get vaulted and unvaulted. Some of them are “epic” and “mythical”. You can defend yourself against the Mandalorians
The government angle I don’t follow. Do you think a govt would *let* you overthrow it? If it was vulnerable it would use both physical power and laws against you. And if you’re okay breaking its laws, why do you need its permission to have a gun? I thought you’re overthrowing it.
When the question is about giving up guns, the dark market comes up as an argument — that’s where the bad people will get them anyway. Why doesn’t the same argument come up when we’re talking about the original supposed purpose — overthrowing the government? Surely it can help.
I guess some people believe that they can *legally* overthrow the government. Like “bro, it’s in the constitution”. I don’t even need to guess, there are people who literally tried that a few months ago and said they thought it was legal.
Bad news, governments don’t like to be overthrown. This is like Government Overthrow 101. Not that I have any experience in this. I just like posting
This thread will get me fucking deported. I’ll go to bed.
Btw I forgot to say the strange thing about the UK. It has an actual “queen”.
Night
I look forward to the day that I no longer have to worry when a friend moves to US that they’ll die such a senseless death instead of, say, getting run over by a car like the rest of us. I know this day will come. Even pessimistically, I know I won’t have to worry after I’m dead
Loved reading all the counter-arguments. Really convincing compared to, *checks notes*, literally living in two very different countries in neither of which this is a thing.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Every codebase eventually grows technical debt. Requirements change, things that used to make sense no longer don’t. People who came up with them aren’t around anymore.
When tech people say our world isn’t deeply messed up, I’m confused. It’s the biggest legacy system out there.
This piece is spot-on. So many harms of today trace back to stupid ideas from hundreds of years ago. Even if most people aren’t that violent, these ideas of “purity” and “modesty” and “shame” are ingrained in our societies. We get so used we don’t notice. religiondispatches.org/dont-discount-…
The same goes for “meritocracy” or capitalism. If you found a way to live within that system, and the system didn’t break you, it is tempting to think of it as a law of nature. Like gravity. But if you wouldn’t risk swapping places with someone else, are you sure that it works?
I was asking about LED lamps a few days ago. A few people linked to “Kōnā Floor Lamp” by “Noxu Design”.
DO NOY BUY THOSE. Noxu Design is a scam company. I bought their shitty lamp and that’s what led me to asking in the first place!
Here’s a small thread about how they operate.
Noxu Design is one of those companies that come up if you search for “LED lamp” or “corner lamp”. If you visit their website and don’t look closely, it might even look legit. But there are red flags everywhere! Can you spot them?
Red flag number one: they claim to be “award-winning” but there’s no mention of what award they refer to.
“Noxu by Norita Xudia.”
Who the fuck is Norita Xudia? Perhaps, a designer? No, it’s a fake person with 10 google results. This lamp must be their life’s work!
I think how people deal with this feeling is one of the most noticeable differences between experienced engineers and those who are new to the field. It’s something you can get much, much better at.
I thought I need to become “smarter” to get out of this. Turns out, it’s not primarily that but:
- Noticing when your mind can’t hold the whole picture, and using tools (pen and pencil)
- Learning good debugging strategies
- Grouping code to create guarantees I can rely on
Even the smartest people in the field aren’t some kind of cognitive monsters. We all have similar brains with similar limitations. But experienced developers are better at slicing the program in a way that each piece can fit in a human brain, while other pieces stat predictable.
Despite all its warts, MDX is a gamechanger for writing documentation and technical content. It removes the friction between the desire to add a bit of interactivity, and actually doing it in a way that surpasses your original intent. I can’t imagine going back to plain Markdown.
When writing, I used to “think in” Headings, Images, and Text. But now I can also “think in” in <FunFact>s, <Gotcha>s, <CodeSandbox>es, <Quiz>es and whatever domain-specific thing makes sense for this piece of content. Removing friction frees the imagination.
Unlike with a traditional CMS-backed writing, I don’t need a vendor to tell me what kind of blocks I’m allowed to use. I want to make my own in a few minutes.
My biggest problem with MDX is complexity of the stack. Hoping Server Components can simplify it in the long term.