Now: A judge has ordered Capitol riot def. Thomas Hale-Cusanelli, described by the govt as an "avowed white supremacist and Nazi sympathizer," to stay in jail. Judge gave weight to his history of violent, racist speech + comments *after* Jan. 6 expressing desire for civil war
Hale-Cusanelli had argued for pretrial release, with his lawyer focusing on the fact that he's not charged with assaulting anyone at the Capitol, and arguing that he hadn't acted with violence in the past on his documented history of hate speech
Govt argued the evidence showed Hale-Cusanelli's ideology had "escalated," that the court shouldn't wait for him to act on it to consider him a danger given the nature of what he's said, and that it's "naive" to think he's less likely to act now, given consequences of prosecution
The prosecutor (and, subsequently, the judge) also expressed concern about Hale-Cusanelli posing a danger to a confidential source who cooperated with the govt and recorded a Jan. 14 convo with the defendant where he talked about civil war and "the purpose" he felt on Jan. 6
Govt also argued Hale Cusanelli's proposed custodians were inappropriate, noting one appeared to share his beliefs (and was in "Facebook jail" for saying NJ gov should be beaten to death) and the other responded to a photo of him with a Hitler moustache with "I can’t with you"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zoe Tillman

Zoe Tillman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZoeTillman

23 Mar
Hearing underway in the Oath Keepers conspiracy case. Judge Amit Mehta is not happy about former DC acting US atty's Michael Sherwin recent 60 Minutes interview + NYT story about potential sedition charges. Judge warns he won't "hesitate" to impose a gag order if it happens again
Mehta: "The government, in my view, should know better" (but also makes a point of noting none of the prosecutors in the room were quoted making the statements at issue)
DOJ supervisor tells the judge that as far as they can tell, Michael Sherwin didn't follow the department's rules/procedures for media contacts with his 60 Minutes interview, and have referred him to the Office of Professional Responsibility
Read 6 tweets
22 Mar
Sidney Powell has moved to dismiss Dominion's defamation lawsuit. She argues that when she accused Dominion of being part of an election-rigging scheme with ties to Venezuela, "no reasonable person would conclude" those "were truly statements of fact" assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2051…
Powell argues she can't be liable if the information she based her "opinions and legal theories" on were actually unreliable, comparing herself to reporters who get 1A protection when they cite sources; but she later also makes clear she disputes that her info was "false"
Powell also raises jurisdictional and venue-related arguments, basically saying the parties + allegations lack sufficient ties to DC and the case should be moved to Texas
Read 6 tweets
22 Mar
A federal mag. judge in West Virginia is hearing arguments this morning on whether to keep George Tanios — one of two men charged with assaulting Officer Brian Sicknick at the Capitol — in detention pending trial.

Previously: buzzfeednews.com/article/davidm…
Tanios's lawyer had objected to the govt's decision not to put an FBI agent involved in the case on the stand; the judge heard brief arguments about that and overruled the objection, finding govt could proceed by proffer. So they're just starting arguments on the merits now
AUSA showed video from Jan. 6 that the govt says records Khater asking Tanios, "Give me that bear shit" and Tanios replying, "Hold on, hold on, not yet, not yet." The video was choppy, at least on my screen, and it's hard to hear w/ crowd noise, but believe I caught "bear shit"
Read 33 tweets
19 Mar
The superseding indictment was unsealed today in the latest Proud Boys conspiracy case: assets.documentcloud.org/documents/2051…

"I'm proud as fuck what we accomplished yesterday, but we need to start planning and we are starting planning, for a Biden presidency"
Govt says an encrypted messaging channel called "Boots on the Ground" was created on Jan. 5 for Proud Boys comms, and 60+ people participated. Unnamed unindicted co-conspirator allegedly messaged the night before: "...cops are the primary threat, don't get caught by them or BLM"
On Jan. 4, after PB chair Enrique Tarrio was arrested, govt alleges defendant Charles Donohoe was worried previous comms were compromised and took steps to "nuke" another channel.

"Everything is compromised and we can be looking at Gang charges ... Stop everything immediately"
Read 4 tweets
16 Mar
Hundreds Of People Who Joined The Capitol Riot May Never Face Charges buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil… with @kenbensinger & @jvgarrison
US Capitol Police estimates ~800 people went inside the Capitol on Jan. 6.

Roughly 300+ have been charged, and prosecutors shared last week they expect to charge "at least" 100 more.

This suggests hundreds who joined the riot could avoid prosecution.
buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
The vast majority of people were allowed to leave the Capitol that day. Court docs describe how alleged rioters used the days and weeks that followed to scrub online profiles, hide evidence, threaten witnesses, and even try to leave the country. buzzfeednews.com/article/zoetil…
Read 4 tweets
16 Mar
The Judicial Conference of the United States, the federal judiciary's policymaking body, had its semiannual meeting today. It's not open to the public/press; reporters get a briefing after and there's a press release about what they did: uscourts.gov/news/2021/03/1…

Highlights:
The judiciary is asking Congress to create 2 new circuit court judgesips in the 9th Circuit and 77 new district court judgeships. Judge Claire Eagen, who did the press briefing, explained that they get these numbers based on a survey of courts
The last comprehensive bill creating new judgeships was in 1990, and an additional 34 district judgeships were added between 1999 and 2003. So it's been a while — the judiciary has made repeated asks for more judgeships based on increasing caseloads over the years
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!