“colic” isn’t a thing. “gripe water” is also not a thing.
except they kind of are. they're multiple things, really.
come with me on this journey. (THREAD)
in 1954, dr. morris wessel published a paper called “paroxysmal fussing in infancy, sometimes called 'colic’” it’s about (as you probably surmised) babies who cry a lot.
the researchers examined the records of 98 babies and separated them into 2 groups: “fussy” and “contented.” how? by using a definition that dr. wessel just made up: babies who cried more at least 3 hours a day, at least 3 days a week, for at least 3 weeks were defined as "fussy"
the rest were “contented.” the groups were evenly split (48 and 50, respectively). in retrospect, we probably shouldn’t have chosen an arbitrary cutoff that pathologizes half the population, but nobody asked me. it stuck. the “wessel criteria” became the definition for “colic.”
(since 1954, we’ve developed vaccines for 9 diseases on the childhood schedule. we eradicated smallpox. we learned how to transplant organs. we went from knowing the shape of the DNA molecule to being able to do shit with it. lots of changes. but not this. this hasn’t changed.)
22 of the cases were determined to be caused by “family tension,” 6 by allergy, 9 by both of those things, and 11 by 🤷🏻♂️
(actual allergy--usually to milk protein at this age--is more like 1-5%. but whatevs, it was the 50's)
for those who have never met a baby, babies cry. some cry more than others. it's typical for a baby between 2 weeks and around 3 months to have an hour or more per day, usually around the same time, when they cry a lot and are difficult to console. just because.
they were probably right about interactions with parents. having a newborn who cries a lot is hard. parents who manage this stress well may help the situation in a couple ways:
-perceiving crying to be less of a problem
-possibly by decreasing the infant’s stress level as well
the overall stress of the infant's environment affects them. interactions with parents are really important. and since colic tends to occur in the first 2-3 months, the roles of parental fatigue, postpartum depression/anxiety, and hormonal fluctuations are undeniable.
essentially, “colic” is a diagnostic dumpster into which we toss a lot of typical newborn behaviour, some milk protein allergy (until it’s diagnosed and treated), infantile dyschezia (babies making funny noises/faces because they’re bad at pooping), and a handful of other things
anyway, on to gripe water, which also isn’t a single thing, but rather...whatever the hell you want to put in it. In 1851, a pharmacist named william woodward hijacked the recipe for a malaria treatment and started selling it to doctors and mothers for...a variety of indications.
the original formulation contained alcohol (3.6%), dill oil, sodium bicarbonate (baking soda), sugar, and water. He trademarked it as “gripe water” in 1876 and picked baby hercules strangling 2 snakes as the logo.
at the recommended dosing, the alcohol content for a newborn would be the equivalent of about 4 ounces of whiskey for an adult. you might think “yeah, that’ll do it.”
not so fast.
in 1979, five years *after* IRBs became a thing, somebody published a study in JAMA in which they compared a solution containing phenobarb in a 20% ethanol solution to placebo. 😳 anyway, no difference. jamanetwork.com/journals/jamap…
woodward's son took over the company in 1912, and sold it to Big...Baby? it's still manufactured and sold around the world, but varies in composition in different countries because some of them--looking at you, brits--made them take alcohol out of the formulation. in 1992.
there's no alcohol in the current US version, either. the “active ingredients” are dill seed oil and sodium bicarbonate (baking soda).
but lots of other companies sell "gripe water" as well. as you can see, gripe water is just really whatever the hell you want it to be.
here are two more.
do they work?
not as well if i answer your question.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
during my MS-3 surgery rotation, i got pulled into a cardiothoracic surgery case. the division, and this attending in particular had...a reputation, and most of us would do anything to get out of working with them. but this time, i couldn't get away.
it was a laparoscopic case involving one lung. my job was to hold the camera--not a particularly difficult job, but one that's really important, and one that's not easy if you've not done it before.
as things were getting set up, the attending was talking to me about how we were going to insert the endotracheal tube further than normal, to intentionally intubate one lung, allowing us to work on the other. brilliant. i'd never thought of that.
when i was in residency, i had an idea for a different practice model. one that would allow me to spend more time with patients, and would let me operate outside the bounds of the typical healthcare system, giving my patients the attention they deserved.
i spent two years working on a business model that i thought would work. i examined similar practices from across the country, took the best parts of them, and implemented them into a practice model that i thought would be great.
but things didn’t go as i had planned. the grand opening was less than grand. i think i saw 2 or 3 patients the first month, which was great for studying for boards, but not so great for paying bills or keeping a practice afloat.
The story of teething begins, as all good medical stories begin, with Hippocrates, who wrote in the 4th Century BCE that “teething children suffer from itching of the gums, fever, convulsions, diarrhoea, especially when they cut their eye teeth.”
(a thread)
It wasn’t until the late-19th century that a precise mechanism was elucidated. J. W. White explained, “The nervous perturbation occasioned by the eruption of teeth increases the susceptibility and lessens the resistive power of the child.” (There, that sounds science-y enough.)
Just a few hundred years after Hippocrates wrote of the perils of teething, Soranus of Ephesus developed one of the earliest recorded treatments for teething:
1) Kill a bunny (or don’t, but it seems the humane thing to do) 2) Cut out its brain 3) Rub it on your kid’s gums
we shouldn't be here. the management of this pandemic has been a complete disaster from the start. efforts to get this pandemic under control have not been only ignored, but undermined by our president. we shut down for weeks, and we have very little to show for it.
we still lack adequate ppe. we don't have a coherent testing strategy, and the tests we are doing often take a week or more. we still lack hospital beds and icu beds and staffing required to handle what's here or coming. that's what the shutdown was for.
we flattened the curve so that we could address those things, and yet here we still are, months later. people are tired of it, and i get it. i'm really damn tired, too. i want this to be over. but we can't just *decide* it's over, which seems to be what's happening.
In the words of Kenny Rogers, "If you're gonna wear a mask, boy, you gotta learn to wear it right." (Thread intended for HCWs, but important for anyone)
Point #1: If you're wearing a mask, its job is not to protect you. The point of the mask is to protect other people from you.
Because a significant percentage of people infected with SARS-CoV-2 don’t have any symptoms, and those that do are contagious before symptoms develop, we have to assume everyone has it, including ourselves. Your mask is intended to protect others from you in case you're infected.
Masks may provide a slight benefit in protecting the person wearing them, but they are dangerous if not used correctly. It’s helpful to think of things as “clean” and “dirty.” As you breathe--or get breathed on, the mask collects and concentrates viral particles.
Biotech companies distributing rapid IgG/IgM test kits for SARS-CoV-2 🦠that provide results in as little as 10 minutes from a simple finger stick.
What could go wrong?
Well... 😬
These are being produced and released without sufficient testing or FDA approval. We don't have great data on how accurate the results are, and any data that we do have likely comes from the companies that are trying to sell them...
I'm not *saying* they'd intentionally fudge the numbers or present only their best data, but I'd be less than surprised.
These tests are different from the COVID-19 testing you've heard of so far. They don't look for RNA from the virus, but for antibodies in your blood.