Ruling on judging by laws other than those decreed by Allah
(Question in Image)
Shaykh Abdul-Aziz Ibn Baz رحمه الله: Those who judge by laws other than what Allah revealed vary according to their beliefs and deeds. Those who rule by secular laws believing that they are more
appropriate and propitious than the revealed Laws of Allah are Kafirs (disbelievers) according the unanimous view of Muslim scholars. The same ruling applies to those who rule by manmade laws instead of the Shari ah (Islamic law) of Allah
believing that it is permissible to do so, even if they still acknowledge that the Shari`ah is more superior than manmade laws. This is because they make lawful what Allah has prohibited Whoever judges by what Allah did not reveal on the ground of mere whimsical desires, or in
the hope of earning some material gain, or due to hostility towards the defendant, or for any other reason while being fully aware that by doing so he is disobedient to Allah and that it is obligatory to rule by the Shari`ah, such a person is a grave sinner and has indeed fallen
in minor Kufr (disbelief), Zhulm (injustice), and Fisq (flagrant violation of Islamic law). This ruling is reported from Ibn 'Abbas (may Allah be pleased with them both), Tawus and a group of the Salaf (righteous predecessors). This was also the preponderant view of the majority
of Muslim scholars. In the end, it is Allah alone who grants success.
Majmū Fatawa of Shaykh Abdul-Aziz Ibn Baz 4/416.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Q: In this country, some ex-Christian women who became atheists marry Muslim men. Is this permissible?
Shaykh Abdul-Aziz Ibn Baz رحمه الله: If these women turn from Christianity to atheism or communism, it is not permissible for Muslim men to marry them. They must be Christians
so that their marriage becomes permissible. However, if they turn to communism and such, they are no longer considered from the People of the Book.
- Majmū Fatawa of Shaykh Abdul-Aziz Ibn Baz 28/121
Ulema also mention they must be pious, chaste and practising Christians.
Just because she says she's Christian is not enough, there are those who commit zina with multiple men a month, and those who believe in evolution or secularism etc these are not Ahlul Kitab.
Shaikh al-Allamah Ubaid Al-Jābiree (may Allah preserve him) said:
“They used to say [in the time of the Salaf]: «Test the people of Madinah by asking them about Mālik (died 179H); test the people of Syria by asking them about Al-Awzā‛ee (died 157H);
test the people of Egypt by asking them about Layth Ibn Sa’d (died 175H); test the people of Mawsul by asking them about Al-Mu‛āfah Ibn ‛Imrān (died 185H).»
And this era the men are tested by asking them about Shaikh Rabee’ (may Allah preserve him).
اللهم يحفظ البلاد المسلمين من شر أهل البدع و إخوان المفسدين و الخوارج و الشياطين من الإنس والجن آمين
O My Lord, protect the lands of the Muslims from the evil of Ahlul Bid'ah and from the Brotherhood of corruption (ikhwan muslimin) and from the Khawarij and Shayatin from
Literal translation of the original tweet (taken from another page):
"The Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Salman has directed KSRelief to send urgently needed humanitarian aid to the brotherly people of Turkey who have been impacted by the earthquake that struck in the
All thats happening now is proof that leadership be chosen the Islamic way, by way of Ahlul Hal wal Aqd giving Bay'ah to the leader on behalf of the population, to avoid these issues,
300 million picks leader
Vs
300 experts picks leader
Shaykh Salih's take on this system:
laymen don't know who's best for us as a leader and what happens beyond the news headlines of biased and partisan media, rather we can't even discern our left hand from our right (figurative language)
The Ulema do, they are the ones trusted and know the rulers the most and
Are the ones able to tell who will benefit Islam the most and who won't, and who is an actor trying to get the Muslim vote and who actually cares to alleviate the conditions of the Muslims,
We can't, we are fuelled by emotion and hastiness, hence why we see people voting along