Michael Harriot Profile picture
Mar 24, 2021 47 tweets 10 min read Read on X
First of all, we have to understand what the filibuster is.

It's ANY MEASURE that stops a vote. That's it. That's all. It's not in the Constitution. The Constitution doesn't really have many rules for Congress. It doesn't even mandate that a majority is needed to pass a law.
Specifically, aside from a majority to conduct business; a 3/4 vote to amend the Constitution; and a 2/3rds vote to expel a member, override a presidential veto and impeach a president.

Every other rule, the House & Senate makes up for itself, according to the Constitution Image
In the beginning, the senate Basically used parliamentary procedure & the "previous question" rule.

Essentially, someone would bring up a "question" (a bill, law, etc) & they would debate it. When everyone was finished, they'd vote to end the debate on the "previous question,"
Then they'd vote on the ACTUAL "previous question" (the law, bill, treaty, whatever.)

I know it's stupid.

Some dude named Aaron Burr thought so, too. When he was VP (which meant he was president of the Senate) he proposed, "Maybe we should stop having two votes."
Everyone agreed. So Burr changed the rules. Basically, when someone proposed a bill, everyone would say the stuff they wanted to say. Then, when everyone was finished, they'd vote on the "previous question."
You may be asking yourself: "Damn, does having two votes really take that long?"

Not really. But here's the thing: Aaron Burr didn't have shit to do.

Back in those days, the presidential candidate with the second-highest number of electoral votes was automatically VP.
He ran against Thomas Jefferson in 1800 and actually TIED. But the House of Representatives voted for Jefferson after Alexander Hamilton convinced Congress that Burr wasn't about shit and wasn't every gonna be shit. (This would make a GREAT MUSICAL)
So shortly after shooting Alexander Hamilton in the face for not keeping Burr's name out of his mouth, Burr changed the Senate rules.
This was when the Senate was all-white (not like today, when it's just 91% white) and white people are the kings of "discovering" things (loopholes, medicines already in use, lands that are already occupied...You know how white people "discover" shit.)

Someone discovered:
"Wait...If we don't want a law to pass, there's literally nothing to prevent us from just talking until someone leaves!" (Remember that Quorum thing I was talking about?)

Thus, the filibuster was born.

Now, when I say "someone, discovered..." There's a name you need to know:
John Randolph of Roanoake.

Not "John Randolph." You gotta say the whole thing like "A Tribe Called Quest" or "Meghan The Stallion."

Seriously, they called him the whole thing. He initially represented Virginia in the House.

And John Randolph of Roanoke could talk his ass off
So when John Randolph of Roanoake discovered there was nothing to stop him from talking, he did that shit ALL THE TIME in the House of Representatives. (Remember, the House AND the Senate had a filibuster. )

Probably because he was high and drunk. Seriously: Image
John Randolph of Roanoake LOVED stirring up shit. He hated EVERYBODY and LOVED slavery (Probably because he had over 500 slaves on his plantation–The Roanoake Plantation.)

See? You gotta say the whole thing.

In 1825, Randolph was appointed to the Senate to fill a vacant seat.
That same year, President John Quincy Adams was trying to pass a bill that J.R. of R. thought would take powers from the slaveholding states.

John Randolph of Roanoake was about to bring his shit-talking to the Senate. He told his Senate colleagues that if they passed it:
"We should deserve to have negroes for our taskmasters, and for the husbands of our wives."

But John Randolph of Roanoake was just getting started. He started roasting EVERYBODY. It was so bad that Henry Clay, the Secretary of State challenged him to a duel!
The bullet didn't penetrate J.R. of R's coat so, they let bygones be bygones.

John Randolf of Roanoake eventually went back to the House but aside from that time he beat another congressman with a cane in the stairs of the House....

And how he fought 1 congressman SIX TIMES
And how he brought his hunting dogs and his "hunting slaves" on the House floor....

And how he stabbed someone with a fork at dinner

And how he started a company to send Black people back to Africa (with the same motherfucker that shot him)

And his heroin habit
And the fact that he owned so many slaves that when he died, there was enough to START THEIR OWN TOWN IN OHIO

And that his tactics, in part, ended the House filibuster.

John Randolph of Roanoake was the first person to perform a Senate filibuster.

And, yes, it was racist AF.
Now historians are gonna say the first filibuster was in 1837 because... that's how white history works.

But before the Civil War, the filibuster was basically a tool used by the slaveholding Southern Senators who filibustered the admission of any free state.

Again, racism.
Then, in 1917, another racist (Woodrow Wilson) said "this is enough" & adopted the "cloture rule." If 2/3rds of the people present voted for cloture, a Senator would have to shut up (I really wish it was called the STFU rule)

In 1949 they changed it to 2/3rd of ALL SENATORS
Why?

Because in 1946, 5 Southerners filibustered for WEEKS against a bill to prevented workplace discrimination EVEN THOUGH IT HAD ENOUGH VOTES.

racism.

Then in 1957, pro-racism Sen. Strom Thurmond set the record by filibustering the Civil Rights Act of 1957 for 24 hrs, 18 min
So in 1959, they changed the STFU rule back to 2/3rds present.

Why?

The Senate was preparing to debate civil rights.

That's THE ONLY reason the Civil Rights Act of 1964 passed after STFU rule was invoked on Southern Democrats' 75-hr filibuster. And guess what happened?
The Civil Rights Act passed on July 2, 1964.

In Sept. 1964, Strom Thurmond bolted from the Democratic Party to help Barry Goldwater convince Southerners that civil rights were evil

It was called the "Southern Strategy."

And THAT'S how the GOP became the party of racists. Image
If you're still skeptical about the filibuster, here's one last story.

In 1918 Rep. Leonidas C. Dyer introduced a bill that would establish lynching as a federal crime.

It failed.

Why? Because Congress said Black men were running around raping white girls (Imagine that)...
Then, in 1919, white people went on a lynching spree now known as "Red Summer"

I mean it was crazy. But, to be fair, the whites called them "race riots," initiated by "radical propaganda" and Black WWI vets believing they should be "conciliatory" to whites.

That y'all Senate. ImageImageImage
So the NAACP produced a report that disproved the myth of Black savages who couldn't stop their urges to attack flack butts & thin lips.

Less than 1/6 of the Black people who were lynched in the previous 30 years were accused of rape.

This totally changed white people's minds
Sike. The bill still didn't pass.

But Black folks didn't stop trying>

It was filibustered in 1922.

And in 1923.

And in 1924.

I think you see where this is going.
When was the last time it was filibustered?

Well, here's an interesting fact:

In 2020, the Senate tried to pass the Emmett Till Anti-lynching act.

One man, Sen Rand Paul, filibustered it.

Why?

Because he said the bill would... (Wait till you hear this shit)
"...cheapen the meaning of lynching by defining it so broadly as to include a minor bruise or abrasion."

Now Paul didn't have to stand up and talk. He didn't have to rant for hours.

BECAUSE THE FILIBUSTER IS NOT REAL.

See, most filibusters never reach a cloture vote.
If someone SAYS they're gonna filibuster, it kills the bill unless it already has 67 votes. You don't actually have to do it, you can just THREATEN it.

So Rand Paul killed the bill...

On the day of George Floyd's funeral.

But here's the thing about that bill...
Aside from a few changes in fines and a part demanding equal treatment by police, the Emmett Till Anti Lynching Act is THE EXACT SAME BILL as the Dwyer Anti-Lynching Act.

To this day, there has never been a federal law against lynching.
And it is BECAUSE of the racist history of the filibuster.

It is a tool of white supremacy. Nothing else.

Anyway... Mitch McConnell knows this.

How do I know?

Well, in 1964, when those Southern Democrats were filibustering the Civil Rights Act, one Southern Senator didn't
John S. Cooper the Senator from Kentucky.

Some of Cooper's interns had to quit because they were threatened when he became one of the few Southerners who voted to invoke the STFU rule.

But not one.

Some dude named Addison Mitchell McConnell Jr
Mitch McConnell is a liar.

But I'm sure you already know that.
Hold up, there's one last story I need to tell.
Here's how this thing comes full circle.

In 1619, 160-ton Dutch privateer ship flying a British flag arrived on the shores of the Jamestown Colony. From that ship, the White Lion, came "20 and odd negroes" who were the first enslaved people in the English colony of Virginia.
Now, you probably know this.

But why do you think that ship chose Virginia?

Well, the captain of the White Lion was a thief. His partner was named Daniel Elfrith, who captained the Treasurer, who bought a load of enslaved people 4 days later.
The two captains had attacked the San Juan Bautista and stolen its human cargo that it was trying to sell in Mexico.

But because England & Mexico were beefing, they couldn't sell the enslaved people in Spanish territory. They really couldn't sell them in English territory.
No one was really fucking with pirates at the moment.

But told the White Lion "meet me in Jamestown, I know a guy."

The guy was like: "Broke-ass Jamestown? They ain't got no money!"

He was right. Everyone in Jamestown was starving. Jamestown was basically a failed colony.
Except for one dude. He had figured out a way to plant tobacco. And the natives were whipping the English ass until the Jamestown governor tricked the chief's daughter into coming onto a ship. When the dude married the chief's daughter, the chief gave the lazy ass Englishmen food
He also gave his daughter's new husband (yall call her Pocahontas) free land. But who'd work it? The colonizes didn't really know how to plant shit.

They were literally eating other white people until they got the welfare smithsonianmag.com/history/starvi…
But Pocahonatas' husband recognized the ship, the colonists got a few enslaved people and future America was saved.

How did he recognize the ship?

Well, it was the same ship Pocahontas was kidnapped on. It was the same ship he had traveled on to England—the Treasurer
What does this have to do with anything?

Well, in the 1500s and 1600s ships flying English and Dutch flags did this all the time. It led to quite a few beefs. But they didn't call them "pirates" or "thieving-ass white people" They used a Spanish term.
The Spanish term eventually was used when white people tried to start their own slaveholding countries by overthrowing Central American countries.

Then it became a term for lawless white people who ignored rules like the thieves who stole Africans and bought them to America
Or as we call them now:

Filibusters.

etymonline.com/word/filibuster
So, great question @evamckend

And that’s why:

theroot.com/the-filibuster…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Michael Harriot

Michael Harriot Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @michaelharriot

Apr 26
A few years ago, while working for one of the greatest sports franchises of all time, I learned a very important life lesson.

A thread
Every summer, my hometown's recreation department hosted a "stop the violence" summer league to keep kids "off the street."

It eventually became so competitive that teams would recruit out-of-town ringers, leaving local basketball players shut out of their hometown's tournament
My homeboys asked me to sponsor a team and I agreed. Unlike the other teams, no one on my team played college ball. They were essentially regular dudes from the hood who just loved basketball.

And yes, they were very "hood"
Read 24 tweets
Apr 19
Many people don’t know that the phrase “crabs in a barrel” comes from an old Geechie Gullah tale.

A thread:
A long time ago, it was impossible to catch crabs. They were too crafty. Even when they got caught in a net, other crabs would come and free them. Then, one day, a fisherman found a crafty old crab in his net one morning. He was just about to eat it when the the crafty old crab said:

“Please Mr. Fisherman, don’t eat me. Please don’t eat me!”
“Why wouldn’t I eat you?” said the fisherman

“Because I’m crafty, old, & other crabs respect me,” the crab replied.

Fisherman: What good does respect do me? You ain’t nothing but a crab”

Crafty Crab: Well crabs are very stupid, and I’m smart. They’ll believe anything I tell them
Read 11 tweets
Apr 18
7 years ago, I wrote a small piece about a man who was falsely accused of a crime.

A few days later, I got an anonymous telling me to look up the woman they called “the evilest white woman on earth.”

What happened next is the absolute wildest story you’ll ever hear

A thread
The story begins in 2017, when an editor asked me to fill in for a coworker and do a quick write-up about Lamonte McIntyre, who spent 23 yrs in prison for a double murder he didn’t commit.

I thought it was weird his conviction wasn’t actually overturned

theroot.com/lamonte-mcinty…
I got an anonymous tip telling me that I should look into it more. But I was filling in, remember. At the time, it wasn’t really my beat.

A few months later I just HAPPENED to be covering an unrelated story about cops who sexually assault women

theroot.com/kansas-finally…
Read 22 tweets
Apr 16
Good question.

A BETTER question is why is Youngkin so determined to give Klan-affiliated white women welfare by stealing money from Black kids?

A thread.
Contrary what people who don't read things say, the Virginia legislature is not "targeting" the Klan-affiliated, pro-Confederate hate group that is responsible for the "lost cause" by taking the tax-exempt status from the KKK's little sister.
Image
Image
See, in 1950, Virginia GAVE the UDOC a plot of land to build their HQ in Robert E Lee Park with 3 stipulations

1. They had to finish building in 5 years
2. If they didn't, the land reverted back to the state
3. If they finished, the state would GIVE them an additional $10K
Read 10 tweets
Mar 21
One more thing:

In 1924, lawmakers tasked the census bureau was tasked with figuring out the “national origins of the white population of the US.”

If white people were from a certain country, that country was considered “Good.” Nonwhite people were from “bad countries.” Image
To preserve the country’s racial composition, they created a formula. Ppl from good countries could immigrate based on the % of pop. in the formula. Immigration from bad countries was limited.

And no Asians

This was why we call it the Asian Exclusion & National Origins Act Image
In 1952, they changed the formula to allow people from “bad countries” to immigrate at a minimum # 100

Except for Africans. Under the formula, ALL of Africa was considered 1 country

In 1965, civil rights activist convinced LBJ to sign the Immigration & Nationality Act Image
Read 7 tweets
Mar 20
I'll take this one.

The idea that affirmative action or diversity, equity & inclusion policies equal lower standards is something that a lot of people believe.

Instead of citing what "I believe" like Elon did, let's use facts & a something I like to called "math"

A thread.
First of all, there is a good reason why Elon referred to Duke. It's part of a discussion began by Ben Shapiro and some other white people after a white girl said some things about Duke Medical School's DEI program

By its own admission, the school has a DEI program.
Duke Medical School is 12.5% Black and US News ranks it as the 5th best medical school in America. Nationwide, Black students make up 10% of medical students.

25 years ago, Duke was ranked 6th and was 9% Black. In 2005, the medical school was 15% Black.

So what did DEI change?
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(