Let’s say you are– for sake of argument – involved in a democracy movement in a post-Soviet dictatorship. Recently the police picked you up, beat the hell out of you & assaulted you in ways you’d rather not dwell on > 1/
Then they booted you out of the police station and told you to keep quiet if you value your life. Recovering at home, you’re aware of the blokes in parked cars outside the flat, & your neighbour’s friend in the police warns you you’re on the list next time it all kicks off 2/
You climb down a drainpipe in the middle of the night and make it to your aunt’s house.

What do you do now? 3/
What Priti Patel would like you to do – other than ceasing to be her problem, even hypothetically – is sit in a refugee camp & hope some beneficent Western country deems you to be deserving & rescues you – or so it seems from her incoherent plans today 4/
But where are these camps? There are no safe zones in your country & even if they existed in a neighbouring one, the land borders are sealed. Nor (if you even think about it) are you confident that, if camps did exist, people like Patel would sincerely be trying to get you out 5/
You can’t come legally to the UK, or any other safe country, because they won’t give you a visa & anyway the police have kept your passport.

But a friend of a friend knows a people-smuggler & if your family cobbles together enough money they’ll get you out in secret 6/
Maybe you believe the UK respects human rights – maybe you’ve heard UK ministers boasting about this – maybe your cousin lives here, maybe it’s just because the first flight which a corrupt border guard can help you get on is bound for Heathrow. Anyway, you end up in the UK. 7/
You’re afraid immigration officers will just send you back if you claim asylum at the airport, you’re feeling exhausted & scared & want to speak to a lawyer, & anyway the smuggler has told you to pretend to be a tourist, so you do. Then you claim asylum a few days later 8/
You’re likely to find seeking asylum humiliating & stressful, with dismal accommodation & a confusing application process. Perhaps you find it hard to talk about just what happened in that police station. But you fight on & a couple of years later get asylum 9/
Under Patel’s proposals, you won’t get permanent residence or even something leading to it, just temporary, renewable status. You’re told this is bc of your means of travel & the need to deter smugglers, & it’d be different if you’d only waited in that imaginary refugee camp 10/
You hear Patel on the radio saying you elbowed aside women & children patiently waiting in camps (you may even be a woman and/or a child, let’s not follow PP in leaping to conclusions here, tho there are reasons why many asylum-seekers in 🇬🇧 are men) 11/
You find this mind-achingly disingenuous, but more pressingly you have nightmares of what will happen if you’re sent back at the end of your temporary status. You find it hard to work & settle down, while politicians blame you for not integrating. 12/
When you do re-apply to stay, your application sits in a queue for years bc the Home Office don’t have the staff to deal with it (they already can’t cope with initial applications, altho they’re fewer than before). Your nightmares & anxieties increase. 13/
Sometimes you wonder where the deserving refugees are, who were supposed to be disadvantaged by your secret journey, and begin to suspect that the UK government wasn’t being 100% sincere when it said it’d increase the numbers it accepted from camps or "official routes" 14/
Details obvs vary, but this kind of experience – using clandestine means to save your life urgently – is common & is caused by restrictive visa policies & carriers’ liability legislation (fining airlines etc who bring people with the wrong documents) 15/
Let’s be clear: the govt’s proposals are going to cause more pain & misery to people who've already suffered too much. There’s no decent, sincere basis for playing off one kind of refugee vs another, acc to means of travel, or gender, or anything else 16/
It’s unclear (to say the least) that Patel’s proposals are in line with the Refugee Convention – which broadly prohibits penalties based on means of entry + requires states to help refugees integrate – or the non-discrimination provisions of the ECHR 17/
But this is what happens when the humanitarian intentions of refugee law – forged, let’s recall, in the shadow of Nazism & the shameful failure to protect its victims – come into the sights of people whose worldview is to punish, control & exclude 18/
And of course this viciousness isn’t only something that comes naturally to some kinds of politicians, it’s also something many of them see as electorally advantageous. 19/
Amazingly there are still some who think supposedly progressive people can win that sort of arms race with the right. We can’t. That’s why it’s so important that we don’t only oppose these measures but also try & change the whole narrative. /end (for now)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alasdair Mackenzie

Alasdair Mackenzie Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlasdairMack66

22 Mar
So Priti Patel is on the warpath again – about asylum seekers, their lawyers and the legal mechanisms they use to challenge the Home Office. Here’s a little thread to try & illustrate how honest she is being in presenting the government as the victims in all this. 1/
My asylum-seeking client – let’s call her Z – is a single woman with a small child. They applied to the Home Office for support & accommodation (“asylum support”) in March 2020. The HO agreed they’re destitute and therefore eligible for asylum support. 2/
Z and her child waited for that accommodation to be provided 3/
Read 15 tweets
10 Dec 20
Meet Mohammed al-Masari. He’s a former physics professor and leading critic of the Saudi Arabian royal family. In 1996 he fled to the UK and sought asylum. The Saudis demanded that the British should expel him. 1/ Image
This presented the then Tory government with the opportunity to show how much it cared for human rights, an opportunity which, obviously, it flunked. 2/
Now clearly Dr al-Masari would be tortured or killed if sent back, so how could the government placate the furious Saudis w/out breaking the law? They decided to send him to Dominica, in the Caribbean.
They offered the Dominicans large amounts in aid – so it’s widely assumed. 3/
Read 16 tweets
19 Oct 20
We regret once again to inform you that your taxes are being spent on misleading propaganda.

It’s important to appreciate just what’s going on here. >
This stat from the video is correct but out of context, bc a) most refugees in Europe don’t arrive via resettlement programmes but “spontaneously” ie independently of govt measures & b) the number taken by 🇬🇧 is a pinprick next to over 26 million refugees in the world in 2019>
But this is the real problem: the UK’s focus *isn’t* currently on resettlement - the 5600 accepted under that route compares to more than 13k accepted after arriving independently. So why does the Home Office want you to think this? >
Read 5 tweets
18 Oct 20
Of course we don’t yet know whether to take the Home Office’s latest idea any more seriously than wave machines or Ascension Island, but what seems likely it involves performative viciousness against some of the world’s most vulnerable people 1/ ImageImage
Inhuman & degrading treatment is banned by Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which also bans torture, but the controversial aspect (for the Tories) is the way it prevents people being expelled to die or suffer intensely from physical/ mental illness 2/
The principle that it’s inhuman to send seriously ill people to die or suffer great anguish was upheld recently by our Supreme Court, following a decision of the European Court of Human Rights called Paposhvili 3/
supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-201…
Read 8 tweets
15 Oct 20
Seems reasonable to assume that if @uklabour’s stated reasons for supporting the CHIS (“Spycops”) Bill are as evasive as this piece by @ConorMcGinn (shadow security minister), either they’ve got no proper reasons or don’t want to admit what they are >
labourlist.org/2020/10/voting…
Ok, so starting with this, the behaviour of the security services is already subject to the Human Rights Act, as are all actions by public authorities. The CHIS Bill won’t affect that at all. >
Does this mean undercover sources will cease to be in the shadows? If so, they’re not really undercover, are they? Is that really what the CHIS Bill is trying to achieve? What does Conor McGinn even think he means by this?
Read 9 tweets
20 Aug 20
Remarkable how this crisis has brought out people whose confidence in commenting isn’t obviously matched by any expertise

This guy for e.g has got 100s of likes & RTs for a vast thread mixing sympathetic on-the-ground reporting with obnoxious generalisations & flat-out untruths
For instance this is flatly false. There is no queue for asylum claims outside the UK which is being jumped.

It is just not true that most people can claim asylum in the UK from abroad (Afghan British Army interpreters had a v specific programme which didn’t even help all of them). That fact (& the difficulty in solving it) is part of the problem

Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!