All the good tweets condemning the fatphobic and moralistic tone have been written. (She's clearly been ratio'd)

I'd like to zoom out to look at what this post says about our puritanical culture how we think about *pleasure* and *treats* and DRUGS.
1) There is clearly this belief that because they are available for free, that somehow every vaccinated person will show up every day for their daily free donut.

They won't. Some might. But that's not how most people work. Most people moderate pleasure.
2) It's also clearly *RICH* to individualize something as policy-driven as sugar consumption, weight, and obesity. An innocent campaign for a free donut isn't going to undo systemic policy choices. (Not my wheelhouse, so I defer to the other tweets on this)
3) Others have also done well in their pushback of any judgment of how people find pleasure during a global pandemic and other syndemics that are claiming lives every day. (Another important argument)
4) We should also think about how the benefit that a campaign like this has to NORMALIZE and REWARD a positive public health behavior like vaccination. KK has inroads in small towns and communities across this country with 'vaccine hesitancy.' I'm sure it's motivated someone.
5) If you're pissed a sugary carb-based company has done SOMETHING to support vaccination, why not push your "healthier" brands to do something too? Why put the onus on them for doing something with the product they peddle?
6) I digressed - but I am PISSED she said that KK should donate boxes to organizations or workplaces doing good work instead.

This reiterates the idea that working and 'good' people can moderate, but 'the masses' cannot. THIS IS RACIST, CLASSIST, and ABLEIST. Like drug laws.
7) Many 'experts' feel the public cannot behave themselves when given access to pleasurable and enjoyable things (like fast food and drugs), and selectively use data to confirm these beliefs.
8) This actually doesn't acknowledge that yummy (and sometimes unhealthy) foods and drugs are incredibly EFFICIENT. They give lots of benefits and deliver lots of pleasure in ways that many things in life do not. Most of us are willing to accept the tradeoffs.
9) But people who develop high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, or problems with drugs not because they were always 'having fun' and indulging in things 'other' people have moderated.

These statements affirm that harmful mythology, though. Justify prohibition. Moralize outliers
10) Stopping although there's more to say. You get the gist.

Let's always stop and ask ourselves - "What might I be saying or doing that conveys that someone doesn't deserve joy today?"
+ "And what does my willingness to deny others joy say about MY OWN feelings about joy and pleasure and worthiness?"

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sheila Vakharia PhD MSW

Sheila Vakharia PhD MSW Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MyHarmReduction

23 Mar
Two projects I collaborated on with colleagues have been released TODAY and they're both on ✨STIMULANTS ✨

A mini-thread, I promise...
1) ✏️We filled a gap in the policy space by developing a resource on policy responses to stimulants since everything is opioid-focused these days.

"Policy Proposals to Reduce Stimulant-related Harm: How to Address the Fourth Wave of the Overdose Crisis"

drugpolicy.org/sites/default/… Image
2) Just in time for #NDAFW (National Drug and Alcohol Facts Week) which ends up being a week about fear and stigma, we have released our "10 facts about methamphetamine" page and fact sheet!

drugpolicy.org/drug-facts/met…
Read 4 tweets
7 Jan
Gonna switch gears for a second to tweet about the problem with Dryuary and other self-imposed periods of 100% abstinence since I’ve now read 5 different tweets about people “failing” their Dryuary goals bc 2021 is currently a dumpster fire and people want to drink. (1/?)
2. First of all, goals like Dryuary for a month free of alcohol are actually quite admirable and probably a good practice for most of us. A break never hurts. And they can be a chance to reboot and get perspective on our patterns of use, role of alcohol in our lives, etc.
3. BUT these kind of goals can also be a troubling set up for a lot of us because these kinds of efforts actually require a bit more conscious planning and preparation than most of us do in advance. And they require us to practice different strategies in the moment.
Read 15 tweets
4 Jan
The NYC Dept of Health and Mental Hygiene (@nycHealthy) released some 2019 overdose death data and preliminary 2020 overdose death numbers for the first quarter of the year. It's not good news. A thread 🧵🧵🧵
1) Overdose deaths remained high in 2019; similar to 2018 rate of 21.2 per 100,000. Opioids involved in 83% over all overdose deaths, fentanyl most commonly involved drug in overdoses (in 68% of deaths). You can read more here:

www1.nyc.gov/assets/doh/dow…
2) You can see here that the overdose death rates in NYC increased in recent years. Not a coincidence that we saw this jump after fentanyl entered our heroin supply. Image
Read 9 tweets
8 Dec 20
A lot of really important and interesting myth-busting studies, articles, and papers have been released lately about people who sell drugs.

Here's a thread highlighting them and some key themes (1/?)
1) Just today, @Talkingdrugs ran a piece on a small study with 13 dark net drug sellers, which found many were motivated to keep customers safe and informed of drug risks, including harm reduction education talkingdrugs.org/consider-the-d…
2) A few days ago, @SessiBlanchard wrote a piece for @Filtermag_org based on leaked FBI documents showing they knew drug sellers were selling customers new syringes and fentanyl test strips, as well as testing their own meth supplies for fentanyl: filtermag.org/fbi-dealers-ha…
Read 18 tweets
11 Nov 20
Drug courts are not:
- an "alternative to incarceration;"
- a substitute for all drug decriminalization;
- a panacea; or
- a "public health" approach.

I was a drug court representative for years. I know.

A THREAD 🧵🧵🧵....
1. Drug courts cherry-pick their participants so few are eligible. Most have very strict criteria (first-timer, no mental illness, no felonies, no violent charges, etc.) so people with most severe problems who arguably have most to gain are usually INELIGIBLE for services.
2. Judges and non-clinical team members can weigh in on treatment decisions. Drug courts have a terrible track record when it comes to medications like methadone and buprenorphine. A judge can say you need a weekend in jail after your most recent relapse to "teach you a lesson."
Read 11 tweets
29 Sep 20
.@MayaSchenwar opening by discussing the 'alternative to incarceration' that many talk about - electronic monitoring. "We shouldn't have to choose between prison and prison-lite." They "widen" the net. Same with probation- classist, ableist, and racist system. Set many up to fail
.@MayaSchenwar now referencing drug courts as a common alternative to incarceration and the current overdose crisis. "Giving people the choice between prison and treatment is...essentially, mandating it." And although these have gained bipartisan support, are deeply problematic.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!