1) There is clearly this belief that because they are available for free, that somehow every vaccinated person will show up every day for their daily free donut.
They won't. Some might. But that's not how most people work. Most people moderate pleasure.
2) It's also clearly *RICH* to individualize something as policy-driven as sugar consumption, weight, and obesity. An innocent campaign for a free donut isn't going to undo systemic policy choices. (Not my wheelhouse, so I defer to the other tweets on this)
3) Others have also done well in their pushback of any judgment of how people find pleasure during a global pandemic and other syndemics that are claiming lives every day. (Another important argument)
4) We should also think about how the benefit that a campaign like this has to NORMALIZE and REWARD a positive public health behavior like vaccination. KK has inroads in small towns and communities across this country with 'vaccine hesitancy.' I'm sure it's motivated someone.
5) If you're pissed a sugary carb-based company has done SOMETHING to support vaccination, why not push your "healthier" brands to do something too? Why put the onus on them for doing something with the product they peddle?
6) I digressed - but I am PISSED she said that KK should donate boxes to organizations or workplaces doing good work instead.
This reiterates the idea that working and 'good' people can moderate, but 'the masses' cannot. THIS IS RACIST, CLASSIST, and ABLEIST. Like drug laws.
7) Many 'experts' feel the public cannot behave themselves when given access to pleasurable and enjoyable things (like fast food and drugs), and selectively use data to confirm these beliefs.
8) This actually doesn't acknowledge that yummy (and sometimes unhealthy) foods and drugs are incredibly EFFICIENT. They give lots of benefits and deliver lots of pleasure in ways that many things in life do not. Most of us are willing to accept the tradeoffs.
9) But people who develop high blood pressure, type 2 diabetes, or problems with drugs not because they were always 'having fun' and indulging in things 'other' people have moderated.
These statements affirm that harmful mythology, though. Justify prohibition. Moralize outliers
10) Stopping although there's more to say. You get the gist.
Let's always stop and ask ourselves - "What might I be saying or doing that conveys that someone doesn't deserve joy today?"
+ "And what does my willingness to deny others joy say about MY OWN feelings about joy and pleasure and worthiness?"
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2) Just in time for #NDAFW (National Drug and Alcohol Facts Week) which ends up being a week about fear and stigma, we have released our "10 facts about methamphetamine" page and fact sheet!
Gonna switch gears for a second to tweet about the problem with Dryuary and other self-imposed periods of 100% abstinence since I’ve now read 5 different tweets about people “failing” their Dryuary goals bc 2021 is currently a dumpster fire and people want to drink. (1/?)
2. First of all, goals like Dryuary for a month free of alcohol are actually quite admirable and probably a good practice for most of us. A break never hurts. And they can be a chance to reboot and get perspective on our patterns of use, role of alcohol in our lives, etc.
3. BUT these kind of goals can also be a troubling set up for a lot of us because these kinds of efforts actually require a bit more conscious planning and preparation than most of us do in advance. And they require us to practice different strategies in the moment.
The NYC Dept of Health and Mental Hygiene (@nycHealthy) released some 2019 overdose death data and preliminary 2020 overdose death numbers for the first quarter of the year. It's not good news. A thread 🧵🧵🧵
1) Overdose deaths remained high in 2019; similar to 2018 rate of 21.2 per 100,000. Opioids involved in 83% over all overdose deaths, fentanyl most commonly involved drug in overdoses (in 68% of deaths). You can read more here:
2) You can see here that the overdose death rates in NYC increased in recent years. Not a coincidence that we saw this jump after fentanyl entered our heroin supply.
A lot of really important and interesting myth-busting studies, articles, and papers have been released lately about people who sell drugs.
Here's a thread highlighting them and some key themes (1/?)
1) Just today, @Talkingdrugs ran a piece on a small study with 13 dark net drug sellers, which found many were motivated to keep customers safe and informed of drug risks, including harm reduction education talkingdrugs.org/consider-the-d…
2) A few days ago, @SessiBlanchard wrote a piece for @Filtermag_org based on leaked FBI documents showing they knew drug sellers were selling customers new syringes and fentanyl test strips, as well as testing their own meth supplies for fentanyl: filtermag.org/fbi-dealers-ha…
Drug courts are not:
- an "alternative to incarceration;"
- a substitute for all drug decriminalization;
- a panacea; or
- a "public health" approach.
I was a drug court representative for years. I know.
A THREAD 🧵🧵🧵....
1. Drug courts cherry-pick their participants so few are eligible. Most have very strict criteria (first-timer, no mental illness, no felonies, no violent charges, etc.) so people with most severe problems who arguably have most to gain are usually INELIGIBLE for services.
2. Judges and non-clinical team members can weigh in on treatment decisions. Drug courts have a terrible track record when it comes to medications like methadone and buprenorphine. A judge can say you need a weekend in jail after your most recent relapse to "teach you a lesson."
.@MayaSchenwar opening by discussing the 'alternative to incarceration' that many talk about - electronic monitoring. "We shouldn't have to choose between prison and prison-lite." They "widen" the net. Same with probation- classist, ableist, and racist system. Set many up to fail
.@MayaSchenwar now referencing drug courts as a common alternative to incarceration and the current overdose crisis. "Giving people the choice between prison and treatment is...essentially, mandating it." And although these have gained bipartisan support, are deeply problematic.