Ethereum is an emerging digital economy in the early stages of a multi-decade economic boom.
The Problem?
Dollar-pegged stablecoins dominate Ethereum and the dollar is controlled by the Federal Reserve...
But what if we had stablecoins not pegged to fiat currencies at all?
1/
This is the idea at the heart of the latest wave of decentralized stablecoins.
These novel projects offer a radical opportunity for Ethereum’s monetary system to achieve stability while eliminating dependence on fiat currencies. messari.io/article/the-ar…
It's not surprising that Ethereum has dollarized.
Many developing economies dollarize due to monetary instability.
Stablecoins allow Ethereum to overcome ETH’s volatility, which would otherwise handicap economic growth.
The stability dollar-pegged stablecoins have brought has enabled Ethereum to attract more capital into its economy as well as boost economic growth.
Stablecoins have been a key enabler of Ethereum’s booming DeFi ecosystem.
The flipside of dollarization is that by welcoming stablecoins into its economy, Ethereum has given up its monetary sovereignty and opened itself up to external dependencies that introduce systemic risk.
In practice stablecoin protocols are more like currency boards than central banks.
All their monetary policy decisions are subordinated to maintaining their fixed exchange rate targets with the dollar.
Furthermore the dollar peg also introduces regulatory risk that has the potential to shake the foundations of DeFi.
Playing with the dollar invites the US government to take action.
Look no further than the STABLE act for indication on what worse case scenario could look like.
So what does an independent Ethereum monetary system look like?
In many ways similar to the dollar under the gold standard with a free banking system.
At the core of non pegged stablecoins is collateral, primarily ETH, that ultimately backs their value.
$RAI, $FLOAT, and $OHM each have different mechanisms to stabilize themselves, target prices, and ways of using their collateral.
But that’s the common thread.
Once Ethereum has independent stable currencies, a truly independent banking system can emerge on Ethereum.
Non pegged stablecoins can be put to work in DeFi money markets and yield aggregators which effectively turn those non pegged stablecoins into banking deposits.
But how do these non pegged stablecoins work really?
Will they even work, let alone be adopted?
In our second of two reports on central banking on blockchains we dive deep into $RAI, $FLOAT, and $OHM and peek into the future of money on Ethereum.
It's all about automating information flows and the evolution of the crypto investor.
1/
Currently if you want updates on assets outside the top 10 you’re out of luck if you only follow crypto news publications and twitter.
The result is you have to follow all these projects manually.
The problem of course is that staying on top of all these projects is an extremely time consuming process that requires scouring a wide range of disparate and idiosyncratic sources for high signal information.
To me it is when a protocol is designed from the ground up so that its token is an integral part of the protocol and involved in the value creation process, rather than just serving to extract rent.
1/
Over the past year in DeFi there’s been a renewed interest among the community in value accrual mechanisms for tokens.
Due to a combination of opportunism and naivete, the 2017 ICO era was flush with utility tokens that attempted to jam useless tokens into new projects.
Along this line of thinking, even if a token does implement some kind of fee capture it’s much better to reinvest those earnings rather than distribute as dividends.
UNI implicitly does this by not extracting fees from LPs (fee switch off).
This industry’s obsession with dividends is a backlash to the useless utility tokens from 2017.
Yes it’s important for tokens to have the potential to accrue value.
But earnings potential is not the same as dividends.
One of the more thought provoking essays I’ve read on Ethereum in a while.
In short Ethereum wins not by challenging nation states head-on for monetary supremacy like Bitcoin, but by growing its own digital economy until it surpasses that of the dominant sovereign powers.
“History teaches us that there’s only one viable method for a challenger willing to replace the current monetary reserve: it has to grow its own economy till the point it matches, and eventually surpasses, that of the main global power of the moment — currently, the U.S.”
This is a mental model I’ve long agreed with as well.
Bitcoin - a digital challenger to gold
Ethereum - a digital challenger to sovereign jurisdictions
Bitcoin : Digital Gold :: Ethereum : Digital Economy