@ThroneOfCrypto @__Javs_ @TheADAApe That's totally fine. I think Cardano serves its purpose very well but it wouldn't perform very well in the scenario I just described.
The BFT-style aspect of Ouroboros would already prevent a lot the required properties to hold (i.e. dynamic availability).
The BFT-style aspect of Ouroboros would already prevent a lot the required properties to hold (i.e. dynamic availability).
@ThroneOfCrypto @__Javs_ @TheADAApe After re-reading your comment, I think I misunderstood you.
You didn't mean to simply remove fees from the game all together but to allow merchants to i.e. cover the cost for their clients.
Of course this can be done with delegated fees and it is a powerful concept to lower ...
You didn't mean to simply remove fees from the game all together but to allow merchants to i.e. cover the cost for their clients.
Of course this can be done with delegated fees and it is a powerful concept to lower ...
@ThroneOfCrypto @__Javs_ @TheADAApe ... the entry barrier for new users and boost adoption (especially if your gains have enough margin to cover these costs).
Well ... In that case just read my comment as a nice summary of IOTAs vision 😅
Well ... In that case just read my comment as a nice summary of IOTAs vision 😅
@ThroneOfCrypto @__Javs_ @TheADAApe I really hope you see this comment as it wouldn't feel right to let the statement stand without this correction :p
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
