Dutch province of Brabant, where the far right, climate denying FvD rules together with VVD and CDA, now wants a nuclear power plant. "It takes less space" than wind and solar. Probably so, because it won't happen.
A TNO report commissioned by the province is pretty clear: there are no locations that could get a permit, the thorium type the province wants will not be available for at least 20 years, and wind and solar are cheaper.
Pretty devastating. Unless you just want to slow down the energy transition of course.
FvD party platform: "There is no climate crisis. The climate always changes." Denial for beginners.
Unfortunately, our NOS evening news, which prominently featured the province's fantasy, forgot to ask the provincial executive why he wants a nuclear power plant if there's no climate crisis.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yesterday, wind produced 23% of all Europe’s electricity.
In Ireland, Germany, and Denmark, its share was over 50%!
European windpower already delivered over 80 GW at midnight, it peaked at 87.3 GW around 5 am, then gently slid down to 66.5 GW by the end of the evening.
Solar PV power production in Europe followed a traditional bell pattern yesterday, peaking around 57 GW, well before noon (due to cloudier weather moving into the continent?).
As predicted, the Greens became by far the biggest part in the German state of Baden-Württemberg today, getting almost 1/3 of the votes.
Good to see the extreme right AfD lose 4 %points compared to 2016.
Voters in Baden-Württemberg saw climate & environment as the second most important problem, behind corona.
After 5 years in a coalition government with the CDU, 59% of all voters saw the Greens as most competent on climate action, their #2 issue.
A week with two faces, in German electricity production:
Hardly any wind in the first half, with quite some coal and gas running. Then a sudden change on Wednesday followed by days with lots of wind, completely squeezing out fossil electricity.
Yesterday morning, 20 GW of solar PV and 44 GW of wind power covered 90% of Germany’s electricity load (71 GW). Together with nuclear, bio(gas) and remaining fossil electricity, 15 GW was left over for electricity exports.
The blue line shows the share of all renewables in Germany electricity production over the course of the week (right axis), reaching up to 81% yesterday morning.
As a percentage of electricity *consumption*, renewable came very close to 100% both then and in the preceding night.
Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Greece, Ireland, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta and the Netherlands ask the EU to come up with an end date for fossil fuel car sales, with the option for member states to go even faster. permanentrepresentations.nl/permanent-repr…
To support this "the current CO2 emissions standards must be strengthened significantly to accelerate the transition towards zero-emission road transport.", and manufacturers should be incentivised to develop and produce new zero emission vehicles.
The 9 member states also ask the EU to strengthen infrastructure for zero-emission mobility. "This will foremost require an extensive deployment of public charging."
There are around 270 million passenger cars in the EU+UK.
Assuming they drive around 12,000 km/year and use around 800 liters of gasoline/diesel for that, their final energy demand is around 8 MWh/year each, and 2,000 TWh in total. That’s around 1/6 of total final energy demand.
If you’d replace all of them by electric cars, those would use 2-2.4 MWh/year each, so around 600 TWh in total.
This would reduce EU+UK final energy demand by over 10% (from 12,000 to 10,600 TWh), and increase electricity demand by 20% (from 3,000 to 3,600 TWh).
So just this passenger car replacement would drive up the share of electricity in EU+UK final energy demand from 25% (3000/12000) to 34% (3600/10600).
OK, that was back of the envelope. Would be nice to redo with more precise numbers, but should be in the ballpark.