1/ There's a myth that home deliveries are the 'cause' of recent road congestion, so what are the facts?

Of the 360 billion miles driven on the U.K's roads in 2019:

🚗 77.2% cars/taxis
🛻 15.4% small vans
🚚 4.8% HGVs
🚲 1% bicycles
🏍️ 0.8% motorcycles
🚌 0.7% buses/coaches
2/ In my view, part of the reason for the propagation of this myth is to extend responsibility for road surface miles/injuries/emissions to a broader category of people, and therefore to delegitimise policy responses like LTNs. Data here: roadtraffic.dft.gov.uk/summary
3/ Home deliveries are, of course, environmentally problematic - especially from a waste system perspective - but there is reason to believe that they also help eliminate some car journeys. The potential for delivery decarbonisation is also much greater than for private cars.
4/ Not only can better regulation vastly reducing the resource depletion impact of delivery packaging, but there is also much more scope to decarbonise direct tailpipe emissions through electric-assist containerised cargo-bike deliveries...
5/ Ultimately, there are too many miles being driven on our roads by private cars, for reasons that are often avoidable. These aren't my subjective views, they're the views of the Government's official advisors...
6/ ...and that's why, in addition to road user pricing, controlled parking, significant improvements in public transport, and heavy investment in active travel, we also need Low Traffic Neighbourhoods... londonsociety.org.uk/post/change-op…
7/ One final point, just *look* at how efficient buses and coaches are at moving large numbers of people. 4.07 billion passenger journeys in 2019/20, but only 2.4 billion miles driven.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jon Burke

Jon Burke Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jonburkeUK

5 Mar
1/ Regardless of background, the closer people live to green space, the more likely they are to experience good physical/mental health, improving lives & reducing NHS costs.

THREAD on how we can address the 'green gap' & the climate crisis by radically reimagining our streets!
2/ Unfortunately, 'minority ethnic and low-income families are significantly less likely to have access to green space.' (More green space is linked to less stress in deprived communities, Landscape and Urban Planning, 105(3), 221–229; England's Green Space Gap - @friends_earth)
3/ So, in addition to the environmental necessity of investing in green infrastructure, there is also a strong social & public health case for expanding access to green space. In London, the scope for this appears limited, but that's because we're looking in the wrong places.
Read 17 tweets
12 Nov 20
1/ In 2017, the London Assembly Transport Committee, Chaired by @CarolinePidgeon, undertook a scrutiny into congestion in London. In the fine tradition of pun-based City Hall committee investigations, they called it "London Stalling - Reducing traffic congestion in London"... Image
This scrutiny mainly uses data from the first five years of past decade, but concludes that long before the new LTNs...

🚘 Congestion in London was getting worse.
🛻 Vehicle speeds on main roads were down and journey time reliability worse.
🚐 Delays were up, including buses. Image
3/ Crucially, London Stalling concludes:

"Fundamentally, London’s road network is increasingly hosting more traffic than it has the capacity to cope with."

That was 2017.

In 2019, there were 1.3 billion more miles driven on London's roads than in 2017. Image
Read 11 tweets
4 Nov 20
@RupaHuq 1/ Hi Rupa, with the greatest respect, I won't be taking lessons in comradely behaviour from somebody who has actively undermined a Labour Council attempting to address the huge environmental, social, and health costs of Ealing's 130,000,000 mile increase in driving since 2012.
@RupaHuq 2/ As regards my earlier tweet, I made no direct reference to you, nor did I tag or tweet at you. It was fine for Madelaine Albright to use the term “special place in hell", so I'm not sure why it should be off-limits for any other politician.
@RupaHuq 3/ Frankly, I think your attempt to sabotage Low Traffic Neighbourhoods is shamefully populist. But, it's easy for you do because you won't be at the Full Council when parents turn up to asking who is going to prevent their kids from being crushed by a 4x4 on the way to school.
Read 4 tweets
27 Oct 20
1/ You'll have recently come across claims that '#LowTrafficNeighbourhoods cause congestion', so I thought it might be useful to show that the real cause of traffic jams on London's roads is the vast increase in the number of car journeys in recent years, in almost every borough.
2/ So, let's get started

Between 2008 and 2019, the number of miles driven on Barking and Dagenham's roads increased by 150,000,000.

One hundred and fifty million miles.
3/ Between 2009 and 2019, the number of miles driven on Barnet's roads increased by 280,000,000.

Two hundred and eighty million miles.
Read 37 tweets
25 Oct 20
Stop letting drivers tell you people like you don't cycle. Image
Stop letting drivers tell you people like you don't cycle. Image
Stop letting drivers tell you people like you don't cycle. Image
Read 5 tweets
26 Jun 20
1/ Labour should drop it; it's a goal that can't be delivered. Labour should match Hackney's target of <45% decarbonisation against 2010 levels by 2030 and net zero emissions by 2040. This matches the higher confidence threshold of the IPCC's 1.5C report.
independent.co.uk/news/uk/politi…
2/ I don't wish to diminish the achievements of the Labour GND people who managed to defeat the dinosaurs at Labour Conference, but the motion is a flawed exercise in tech utopianism that naively scopes-out aviation and land transport emissions, meaning it fails on its own terms.
3/ The 2030 target essentially came out of XR, which at the time was run by people like Roger Hallam (who I met at Hackney Town Hall) who are extremely anti-politics, and it's my suspicion that this target was more about showing that politics couldn't deliver than that it could.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!