Yes, There Is Such Thing As Gender Identity Ideology, And Saying So Is Not "Violence" mtracey.substack.com/p/yes-there-is…
This post provides ample reason to conclude that contemporary gender identity activists are 100% operating from within an easily-discernible ideology. They're perfectly entitled to that ideology: but denying its existence is a form of what's sometimes called "gaslighting"
This is elaborated on in the post, but as an early proponent of same-sex marriage one thing I've had to grapple with is that social conservatives were correct to foresee that the enactment of same-sex marriage would not placate LGBT activists, but instead further radicalize them
Persuasive rebuttal 👇
https://twitter.com/fennec_sasha/status/1375597949003124742
To be clear I am not repudiating same-sex marriage as a desirable policy -- still support it -- just noting that its enactment led to the radicalization of gender identity activists who needed another self-actualizing advocacy campaign to embrace
Once again stunned by the quality and substance of the rebuttal here:
https://twitter.com/JHWeissmann/status/1375633635450236930
Incredibly moved by all these thoughtful responses
https://twitter.com/chuchugoogoo/status/1375619316167630850
So we agree that social conservatives were correct in foreseeing that the enactment of same-sex marriage would further radicalize LGBT activists, which one can acknowledge even if you're a longtime supporter of same-sex marriage, as I am. Great!
https://twitter.com/JillFilipovic/status/1375794673793568774
Observation about the angry responses to this post from one of the Trans women I quoted: 
Traumatized by this harassment 😭
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
