On the @cosmo_globalist Cosmopolicast we recorded yesterday, we did a go-round where everyone tried to figure out how to solve the #Suez problem. Hosted by @MoniqueCamarra, with @VivekYKelkar, @NighswanderJon, @akshaya_jose, @IlvesToomas, @RachelMotte, and @is_OwenLewis.
I, of course, said, "Why can't we just blow it up?"
But it turned out really interesting, when @IlvesToomas got us to look at a map and showed us that for pretty much every country but India--for which this is a disaster--it's a non-problem.
Yes, it's a traffic jam and a hassle for vessels that are stuck; but look at the map. Bienvenue, climate change! It's April. We don't really need the Suez Canal until next winter. So we can all stop worrying about it.
We have many such insights in the coming "Live, from the globe, it's Saturday Night!" Cosmopolicast. You won't want to miss it.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Claire Berlinski.

Claire Berlinski. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ClaireBerlinski

27 Mar
This article is bad. cbsnews.com/news/coronavir…

It conflates "created in a lab" with "escaped from a lab." Those are very different things.

This comment is idiotic: Image
The problem is with Anderson's reading comprehension skills, not Redfield's grasp of evolutionary virology. Lipkin's defensiveness, and Anderson's, are dismaying. Image
The lab-leak hypothesis is supported by roughly the same evidence as the no-lab-leak hypothesis, which is to say, almost none, and certainly not enough to be this confident. And this quote? Just kill me now. Image
Read 16 tweets
27 Mar
"Je peux vous affirmer que je n'ai aucun mea culpa à faire, aucun remords, aucun constat d'échec," cette manière de se vanter, mon Dieu, ça le fait paraître aussi éhonté que Trump.

lci.fr/sante/video-po…
C'est juste * bizarre * de dire ça. On est censé dire: "En tant que président de la République j'assume pleinement la responsabilité de cet échec," ou si on ne peut pas se résoudre à dire le mot "échec", au moins "j'assume pleinement la responsabilité."
Si même ces mots restent coincés dans la gorge, la toujours-serviable voix passive reste toujours à la disposition des politiciens. "Des erreurs ont été commises."
Read 5 tweets
24 Mar
If you're telling me you want to put me in a reeducation camp and you tell me you want me to disarm, I'm not apt to do so. To get rid of the weapons, we have to rebuild social trust. People are armed because they don't trust us not to put them in reeducation camps.
No, I don't know how to rebuild social trust, either. But fundamentally, the reason people have guns is because they don't trust the people around them. Rational or irrational, that's why.
I actually suspect even the most ardent 2A enthusiasts are sick to death of this and realize there's a connection between "number of guns" and "number of mass shootings." Deep down, they probably share the desire for "a lot fewer guns."
Read 4 tweets
24 Mar
I pray for them all to be cancelled. Only way anyone's going to read them these days.

True story: How to get your kids to read. Parents, are you anxious because your kids don't like reading? Follow these steps:
1. Do not view books are "very important to your child's development and college education." View them as "something that might shut them up for a while so you can be in peace." Buy every book marketed "for children" on the market.
2. Key: Provide *no* other sources of entertainment--certainly not you. They'll start reading. Worried this will screw them up, emotionally? Probably will, yes.

But they will read. (And they won't lose their minds in a pandemic lockdown, either.)
Read 11 tweets
23 Mar
This is super-interesting and very insightful, I think. "Performative miserabilism" is a great turn of phrase. I was *most* struck by this graph. I realize his point was, "Ignore this graph, they weren't telling the truth before," but I'm not sure that's the best explanation.
It might also suggest that @NighswanderJon was exactly correct on yesterday's @cosmo_globalist Cosmopolicast: claireberlinski.substack.com. People aren't furious at the government's response because they quite like the pandemic.
There could be an enormous number of reasons for this. Most people, after all, don't die. It may be on balance more pleasing to people to sit at home, pursue their hobbies, and stay well away from big family gatherings. Especially since no one is starving.
Read 11 tweets
22 Mar
I'm not sure I agree with this--there's not enough substance really to agree or disagree--but there are some phrasings in this op-ed that strike me.
"For the first time in a long time, the United States is not overwhelmingly predominant." This is true.

"If Beijing dominates Asia, the world’s largest market, China will be globally preeminent—and is likely to use its power to coerce and weaken the United States." Also true.
What does this entail? I don't think it entails what the author is hinting. I'm not quite sure what he's hinting, though. "We need to work with those countries willing to invest resources in confronting China, such as India and Vietnam," he says.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!