DarkOwhitE Profile picture
29 Mar, 24 tweets, 10 min read
Looking to times in between. Take it for what you will. I used the AirForce's most current tweet. Then CQBrowns most current. Time inbetween looks like this. That last 1929, is just kinda a guess, no drop 7,000 so flip it.
I've underlined that 14 days. On the first read, it didn't stand out. After looking at contents of the other drops, it did. I'll explain on the next bit.
Now you can see I've underlined that 14th. Kinda of speaks to 2/4, operating under 28 days this month. Notice Moon, new, Luna, follow the star[s]/[t]? Today is?
This is just an extra bit as well. The drops obvious reference is to John Legend. I can't help but notice [L & H] so perhaps it could be a ref towards John Huber. Not to mention, his investigation at the Clinton Foundation, maybe another tie.
This last one, I went a bit on the wonkey side, flipping and mirroring the 9's so take it for what you will. That one of four is still a 14, begs if it is related. Also, who signed? The doc is heavily redacted. I'll post some snips in the next bit. Also, stars and start.
Page 380 of the doc, under the penalty of perjury. 389 as such. 391, by RR. Then 392, by a redacted Attorney working for the Dept. of Justice?
The next bit is just some extra investigation. This is something I commonly do with tags in drops. If nothing is trivial, those tags featured in the drops serve purpose. The numerical tag from our first two drops, >>2925758
>>1197573
>>2784450
Eliminate the commonalites?
That means from >>1197573 this number you eliminate any 2, 9, 5, 7, or 8 via >>2925758.
So that leaves 113
Now eliminate any 1,9,5, 7, or 3 from 2925758.
Leaving 228
Drops look like this. Can't help but notice the trilogy ref. Now under the same style, Snow White is the first showing? This does tie to the HRC ref, Alice in the Bloody Wonderland? I thought that was SA?
Now 228 does have an SA ref, though I would expect it to be in the first position, lining up for the show, either or, it is what it is.
Now, this is the extra, extra bit. Lets take a look at our orginal time difference. Now I think it's important to remember our original tweet times, both are in reference to CQB, one at 19:05, the other @ 21:49
Let's take a gander at those times once more. Now what about these two variations? Let's explore that question a bit. 0.886111 days? No drop 8,000 we could run it backwards, though I thought of it as an image rotated, like clockwork.
0.886111 as whole image, rotated counter clockwise is 111988.0. Now, divide is featured quite a bit through out the drops. I cut the new number into section, like the image so, 1119, 1198, then 1198.
1119, I'll come back to this one, though the Fake that I've highlighted will be of reference in a few drops.
This one however caught my eye instantly. Q & A, I referred to L & H earlier no? Time is limited? Like clockwork? This prompted the second snip, a side by side.
Doodles, are just some interval and commonalities I noticed. In the middle 07 is on the right. For both side drops, the middle adds up to 07, thogh the very middle 1198 does not. I noted the -20 and +20 just because the numbers zeroed out.
Now we have 1988 to implore. I'll have to say, I think Peter Strokz when I see those initials. Also notice that JOHN HUBER in the tweet is big and bold.
Q & A
L & H RC, John Legend reffed in our earlier drops, is now John Huber for our new one? Will have to note that :26 too.
This is why I highlighted fake earlier, also featured in this one. Big and bold. Also the ref to the congressman featured in the other fake drop. Now again. Same type of process, those numerical tags.
>>978366 as featured in drop 1119.
>>2784450 as featured in 1988.
The 7 and 8 are the only matching numbers. So we zero those out, leaving
9366 which isn't a drop.
Then 2445 minus that zero.
Strange no? (1) of (2) congressman? Fake? TRUST GRASSLEY?
We still have an unexplored number. It isn't actualy a drop though, right? Maybe. The unexplored number after removing the [78] was 9366. Lets introduce a commonality. Think of it as a ratio, 1/3. Thus 9 is a three, 3 is now a one, both 6's are now 2's. 3122 the simplfied.
Seemed like it was totally out to lunch, here's a side by side though. Here again is page 389 from our previous look into this string.
Any mistakes, I apologize, long thread, for the most part I do on the fly. This by all means is not comprehensive, just another re-read I suppose. Not even to contemplate a syntax for a more clear meaning.
@ThreadReaderApp, please unroll.
You'll have to excuse, 28 days this month, just thinking in terms of a ratio 7/28 or 1/4 I suppose, either or, small facet of the thread. Just noticed so I had to correct myself.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with DarkOwhitE

DarkOwhitE Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @EOwhit

26 Mar
I've been quiet lately, seen this, figured I'ld post it up. Seen that B2, then the drop on the 24th made me think of a MOAB, so I compared the two. Looks like this.
The corrosponding drops look like such. Interesting enough at face value. The drop begs the question, Muellers testimony. When was it? 4 months difference on the delta.
Next in line was 2050. I'll come back to this one. Though of interest I've highlighted that number.
Read 9 tweets
18 Mar
I had some times in between pulled up, can't remember the org that I used. Sorry about that folks. The times looked as such however.
I didn't think too much of this at first, it says delta, though we have a three day gap on that, so it isn't a delta. I dunno though, stick with it, I haven't explained why I've pinned the tweet with this qoute.
This would be our second one, this however too, does not explain why I've RT'd StratCom so I'll move on for now. I'll do a side by side in the thread. If you look at the time stamps, some intervals pop out.
Read 13 tweets
16 Mar
Times in between as it realtes back to the drops. This was a RT, so I took the RT time, and did the difference to the original tweet. Looks like this. I used, hours minutes, straight minutes, then the seconds, variated, moved the third to the first.
Drops are such, 1521.
921, just a note on that 27, last drop has the 17 in the minutes column.
Read 4 tweets
18 Feb
What are magazines good for? How about signals? Why am I asking this question, how did I get here? We have to look at times in between tweets from mil orgs, then plug the difference variations back into the boards. This is where I ended.
I started with these. Both from 1st SF Group. 16:43 today. Our comparison from yesterday at 20:28. Now intially I didn't know where I was going. So the SIGNAL stood out more then the magazine, so does Brennan, just saying. Keynote will be explained (kinda) shortly.
Our times inbetween are such. 20hours15minutes, 1,215minutes, [72,9]00seconds. Think of that 2790 as kind of a bonus drop, as it is outside the face value.
Read 13 tweets
10 Feb
I do times in between tweets. Looking to the DOD for this one. Take that diff, plug it back into the drops and look for overlap and pattern. Today at 12:00 on the dot, minus yesterday at 20:31. Diffs translated as such, 1529, 929, 4755.
We'll do em individual, then a side by side, note the timestamps as they span across the boards, yet overlap with one another. 1529.
929. Again the note on the time. That weird Merkel ref. Note the yellow highlight as it goes with our next, and most current drop in this thread.
Read 5 tweets
3 Feb
I do times in between tweets. Looking at Northern Command for this one. The first one is from yesterday at 15:12. The other from today at 18:49. Differences are 27hours37minutes, 1,657 minutes, 99,420 seconds. Drops, 2737, 1657, 2499 (secs ran backward).
2737 is a short one. Makes me think of a certain hot topic though.
1657 looks like this. Always good to implore for ones self.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!