another Facebook hearing underway, this one in Canada. Same pattern of the last few years. Facebook's Canada govt relations' exec (Kevin Chan) filibusters, summons to Zuckerberg, Chan comes back with colleagues to spin some more. parlvu.parl.gc.ca/Harmony/en/Pow…
Chan using prior narratives so far and then heavily leans into a case study with a publisher (Globe and Mail) which doesn't seem available to review. Keep you posted.
Canadian MP @AHousefather asks Chan good governance questions about why Zuckerberg won't answer to Canada. Chan states Facebook never threatens governments..I would have asked Chan about documented and reported threat of UK govt in demanding he testify. techcrunch.com/2020/12/08/mar…
My goodness, Facebook’s arrogance and disrespect for governments. Facebook was just asked about shopping job postings to those with oversight over Facebook. Watch through. -> “It is important that we show love and courage to people when we bring them before the committee.” !!!
Same here. Upon noting Facebook CEO testified to Congress and actively lobbied Australia govt, Facebook’s Chan has the nerve to correct its audience size while later dodging simple questions on whether they even have French-speaking moderators in Canada.
This came after this point about the unique governance of Facebook with extraordinary unchecked powers to put profit over democracy which they’ve done and will continue to do.
Good line of questions by @juliedabrusin pointing out the core issue is Facebook’s surveillance advertising business model which Chan also tries (again) to punt into a different policy issue and dismiss as any different than other advertising.
I suspect @juliedabrusin knows this but this intersection of data policy and competition policy is core to Facebook’s biz model.
Interesting point by @AHousefather on how Facebook’s CEO doesn’t answer to Canadian Parliament yet they refuse to release Canadian revenues and instead bundle them with America. Then Facebook’s big reveal comes soon after that they will now disclose Canadian revenues.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
whew, ok, I made it thru this new class action suit vs Google. 1) like state AGs, focused on ads at intersection of data policy and competition policy 2) lead also brought impressive suit vs Facebook in 2018 (still active) 3) feels more like racketeering👀 documentcloud.org/documents/2053…
there is an interesting claim how Google and Facebook mutually benefited each other enriching data. Reminder, Google merged cookies in Fall 2016 ahead of AG's alleged Facebook+Google collusion in 2017. Cites 🙏🏾WSJ/NYT reporting by @ryanjtracy@JeffHorwitz / @tiffkhsu@daiwaka.
Very interesting point: "Through this amendment, Google explicitly takes the position that nonconsensual surveillance of 'browsing history' is 'dishonest behavior.'"
Watch. Canada first sent Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg a summons to testify nearly two years ago. It’s incredible Facebook can still send in this guy yesterday to make statements like this to Parliament. Of course, when UK pressed too hard, Zuckerberg threatened them. 1/2
Just watch. Another from yesterday. 2/2
They sent him in 2019 to answer Parliaments from around the globe, too.
I would argue this is the most important line of questioning connecting data policy to competition. ETHI (ethics committee) also arrived there in 2019 and it’s why FB is so freaked out by data protection changes from Apple and govts. ht @juliedabrusin
Hearing involving CEOs of Facebook and Google starting now. Livestream here (or use cspan here (c-span.org/video/?510053-…) in U.S. if watching Congress grill CEO of Google on issues caused by YouTube on YouTube is understandably awkward to you). /1 energycommerce.house.gov/committee-acti…
here is a link to their written testimonies published last night. I'll be threading here starting around 12:45pm once they get past opening statements. /2
ok, I'm here. Just in time for @RepJeffDuncan's point of order on why the witnesses aren't being sworn in and their ability to also ask questions of counsel during the sessions. Next @USRepMikeDoyle gets straight to heart of the matter. /3
OK, I’ve read written testimony for CEOs of Twitter, Facebook and Google. Most remarkable, as @zamaan_qureshi noted, Zuckerberg elects to not discuss Facebook’s moves or role around January 6th. This will prove to be a bad way to start to hearing; Google has an entire section.
Zuckerberg spends a lot of time on fact-checking process. It’s too in the weeds for hearing but a reminder how Facebook gives Russia Today and other state actors the benefit of doubt over hundreds of legitimate local news organizations. digitalcontentnext.org/blog/2020/11/1…
Also BREAKING: Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg supports new regulations for platform liability, privacy, data portability, and elections. All of them!
As long as he gets to write them. Pretty please. 🤦🏽♀️
This German antitrust hearing appeal tmw frightens Facebook (and Google) as it combines antitrust enforcement with data protection. Canada MP @beynate smartly asked FB about it in 2019. Watch the discomfort. ps @davidcicilline gets it, new FTC nominee @linamkhan gets it, too.
I picked the wrong month to not know German as this looks to be a fabulous set of resources from a class that has been focused on the Facebook German Cartel Office case.