@mattyglesias This is not a marginal case that requires careful delineation. Glenn has a long and distinguished career of focusing negative attention upon individuals in order to either drive them from the public sphere or sharply reduce their willingness to engage.
@mattyglesias In this context it is fully justified to refer to his activity as harassment, even if it does not rise to either the legal definition or the platform terms of service definition.
@mattyglesias Glenn is a man who viciously attacks people that he disagrees with, usually in moralistic terms intended to generate follow on attacks by his followers. This does not make him a criminal, but it does make him a sadistic asshole who should be shunned.
@mattyglesias And that, it seems to me, is the core of the argument that folks are making on the twitters today.
As I’ve said before, it’s a bit overdue.
As I’ve said before, it’s a bit overdue.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
