One of the best partners designers can have are *engineering architects*.

This might seem a bit counterintuitive but here is a bit more on why this is the case & how designers/design leaders can help transform user experience by partnering with engineering architects.

Thread 🧵
(2/ 15) Design architects have similar goals to many designers: solve complex problems by thinking through the use cases, build scalable systems, and ensure that these systems aren't necessarily always limited by today's tech (or that we can draw a line from here to there).
(3/ 15) Architects also have the responsibility to look through multiple different systems and need to ensure they're looking at the end to end experience, not just a narrow use case or a single siloed product or service.
(4/ 15) Architects are also (generally) looking for partners across the organization to dig deeper through some of the very large and complex issues they've seen. They've seen it all and they know they can't solve it all. They're looking for partners to help.
(5/ 15) In addition, architects realize the power design brings to solving complex problems & the power design can bring to ensuring the systems they're building are being built for the right users/use cases.

They don't want to re-architect all of this in a few months.
(6/ 15) So knowing all of this, how do you build the right partnerships with engineering architects?

Which ones do I reach out to? How do I get their attention?
(7/ 15) First, you need to identify the right architects in your organization.

Who are people-oriented architects in your org that are generally focused on building multi-product portfolio-wide systems?
(8/ 15) In the last engineering all hands, who were the architects that were front and center talking about *use cases* and *customers* instead of just engineering systems?

Those are the ones you want to start with.
(9/ 15) "Yeah, they're really busy though. I don't think they care about me pitching design to them."

You're right. You're not going to pitch design to them. You're going to help *them* solve the problems they're focused on solving.
(10/ 15) Work on finding out the end to end experiences they're focused on and work closely with them.

Pair with them your most technically focused designer who's also a great systems-level thinker (they do exist).
(11/ 15) Help them see the power of pairing design architects with engineering architects.

Every single time I've done it, it was hugely impactful.
(12/ 15) Focus on how you can align with them on user goals and help them tell the story of the underlying systems through the user-focused stories design is good at.
(13/ 15) Now that you've made a successful partnership work, watch the amount of influence an eng architect can bring by highlighting the importance of that partnership to their success.

Not only are you getting more arch. on board, you're getting the whole eng. team with them.
(14/ 15) Finally, never stop learning from them.

Engineering architects are an amazing resource to learn about the technology, underlying systems, and the way solutions truly happen.
(15/ 15) I don't know if I have to add this disclaimer but generally, this is more successful in engineering-driven companies and not all architects are the same. Amazing ones can make a huge shift in how design is seen and they're an amazing partner to help drive better UX.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jehad Affoneh

Jehad Affoneh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jaffoneh

30 Mar
If you’re presenting to your manager, leadership team, or an executive trying to convince them to make a call, I have a presentation format for you to follow.

It's battle tested so you get to avoid my earlier mistakes.

Here's a short summary

(Short Thread 🧵)
(1/9) Start with the conclusion.

I used to think TED talk-like presentations that lead you to the conclusions are the way to go. Not in this case.

Be clear about why you’re there, what are you expecting from them, and what problem are you solving. That’s slide #1.
(2/9) What’s the problem you’re solving and why does it matter?

If you can't get people in the room on the same page about why this problem is critical to the company, it's going to be difficult for you to move forward.

You want agreement that this is a problem that matters.
Read 11 tweets
15 Mar
Design teams often ask for a metric that they could own, improve, and use as a way to demonstrate the value of design in a certain company.

In my experience, there isn’t a single metric but there are ways to evolve a set of metrics that show the value of design.

Short thread 🧵
First, how you measure the value of design depends on the maturity of the team.

Early on, as you build credibility, the most important metric is how your *internal* stakeholders view you. Especially engineering and PM leaders and teams.
Building credibility with engineering and PM teams by showing the value design brings is critical.

You can do this through education but it’s most obvious when you, as a design leader, pair closely with key engineering & PM leaders to help shape strategy and deliver execution.
Read 9 tweets
14 Aug 20
Does your company have an accessibility team?

If not, look into it, advocate for it, and ensure you have the right focus on accessibility and the right investment, processes, and education needed.

Here’s how we made it happen at @VMware, an important thread 🧵
Our investment in accessibility came through our investment in design systems.

The brilliant engineers & designers behind @VMwareClarity worked on it, they continued to push the boundaries of how we ensure Clarity is accessible.

They considered it important & advocated for it.
The more we dug into it, the more we realized we needed more experienced accessibility (a11y) leadership.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!