SCOOP: Biden's COVID team appears to have entertained a test-and-trace app that would have let businesses deny service to patrons based on their health data.
It also would have divided users into three color-coded categories—just like China did last year.freebeacon.com/coronavirus/co…
The app was pioneered by the University of Illinois, which apparently tried to sell Biden on scaling up the school's contact tracing system. It records test results and Bluetooth data to determine who has been exposed to the virus—and "links building access" to that information.
The system resembles the one being used in China, where a mandatory app gives each user a "health status"—green, yellow, or red—that dictates access to public spaces. The University of Illinois app likewise divides users into three categories: yellow, orange, and red.
The proposal would amount to a more extreme version of so-called vaccine passports. Those passports collect less information and use a less granular classification scheme than the University of Illinois app, meaning they pose relatively fewer risks to civil liberties.
The proposal also threatens to exclude far more Americans from public life than measures like voter ID laws, which progressives have decried as the "new Jim Crow." Only 11% of Americans do not have a government-issued ID, whereas 19% don't own a smartphone.
The system could have enabled faster reopenings at lower risk, without centralizing surveillance in the hands of the federal government. But it would likely have encouraged a form of decentralized surveillance among businesses and local bureaucrats, which poses its own threats.
In order to be effective, the app requires widespread participation—meaning local institutions would have a strong incentive to mandate it, even if they weren't technically required to. That could be the beginning of a kind of social credit system.
The app collects less data, and has more built-in privacy protections, than some other systems. And with over a sixth of the population fully vaccinated, Biden seems to have left it on the chopping block.
But whether it stays there in future crises is an open question.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
NEW: Several IT firms that appear to bar US citizens from certain jobs also have contracts with the federal government—meaning that they discriminate against Americans even as they receive millions in taxpayer largesse.
The Trump administration is now reviewing the contracts.🧵
The General Services Administration told me it would "take all necessary steps to ensure accountability," adding that it would launch "a full contract review with our agency partners who have active awards with the named contractors, as well as others as appropriate."
We reported last week that the IT firms LanceSoft and Tekgence had posted job advertisements indicating that "USC," or U.S. citizens, were not eligible for certain roles. Both companies have contracts with federal agencies, according to the GSA’s database of active vendors.
NEW: Many IT firms are posting job ads that unlawfully bar applications from US citizens.
Several of the firms are minority-owned—meaning they receive preferential access to government contracts at the same time that they exclude US workers.
We've found dozens of examples.🧵
In a section title "Visa Requirement," a job ad for LanceSoft stated that "candidates must hold an active H1B visa"—and said explicitly that US citizens need not apply.
"No USC/GC for this role," a recruiter wrote, using the acronyms for U.S. citizens and green card holders.
LanceSoft, one of the largest IT staffing firms in the country, describes itself as an equal opportunity employer that strives "to be as diverse as the clients we partner with." It is a certified Minority Business Enterprise—a status the firm has used to score public contracts.
NEW: NYU Law axed a Federalist Society event scheduled for Oct. 7 because administrators feared protesters would disrupt it.
One official cited the "increased likelihood of demonstrations and protests connected to the anniversary of the October 7, 2023 incidents in Gaza."🧵
NYU’s fedsoc chapter had invited the conservative legal scholar Ilya Shapiro to discuss his new book Lawless: The Miseducation of American Elites. Shapiro, who is Jewish, has criticized anti-Israel protesters and taken schools to task over their handling of encampments.
He has also been the target of multiple campus protests, including one at UC Hastings, where he was shouted down for nearly an hour straight.
EXCLUSIVE: The FBI is investigating social media posts by at least seven different accounts that appeared to indicate foreknowledge of the assassination of Charlie Kirk, according to three people familiar with the investigation and screenshots obtained by the Free Beacon.🧵
The posts—one of which referenced the date of Kirk’s assassination, September 10, more than a month before it took place—were all deleted in the days following the killing.
Several of the accounts appear to belong to transgender individuals, and at least one of them followed suspect Tyler Robinson's roommate, with whom Robinson was allegedly in a relationship, on TikTok.
EXCLUSIVE: The Trump administration has launched a civil rights probe into the Duke Law Journal based on our reporting—and it's warning that Duke Medical School could be next.
The school could lose ~1 billion in federal aid if it does not make major changes within six months.🧵
The Department of Education will investigate the Duke Law Journal’s 2024 decision to award extra points to applicants who mentioned race and gender in their personal statements.
Candidates could earn up to 10 points for discussing their "membership in an underrepresented group," according to the grading rubric for the essays, and an additional 3-5 points for holding "a leadership position in an affinity group."
NEW: After Prop. 209, UC San Diego transferred a race-based scholarship to a private nonprofit, the San Diego Foundation, so that it could continue the program.
Now both entities are being sued under the KKK Act, which bans conspiracies to interfere with civil rights.🧵
The Ku Klux Klan Act bans conspiracies of both public and private actors that deprive "any person … of the equal protection of the laws." It was passed in 1871 to counter the Klan’s lawless intimidation of black voters.
But it is being used today to challenge UCSD’s Black Alumni Scholarship Fund, which a lawsuit filed on Wednesday describes as a "conspiracy to interfere with civil rights."