Our new business model for writers is so sustainable that we're raising $65 million to continue to run it at a massive loss
Substack reminds me of the early days of Blue Apron, where you could get really amazing cuts of meat or fish home delivered at a fraction of their cost because the company was burning money to build market share. The trick is always to know when to get off the Wheel of VC in time
All that's missing from the Substack business model is a feature where, once you get people to sign up, part of the money that comes in from subscribers they bring in later accrues to you
Personally, I'm waiting for the next Medium pivot. Most VC bonfires are one-offs, but @ev has created the rare perennial
The thing about Andreessen-Horowitz investments in particular is that there's always a stupid master plan that the avowed business model is only phase 1 of. You can only get the millions out of A16Z if you know the pitch format, and that requires the grandiose world-eating secret
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Everyone's going on about how serious incidents (like Suez or the Texas blackouts) show that we're too reliant on complex systems. But these incidents are also the only way to build resilience in such systems. We need more of them, at far lower severity nytimes.com/2021/03/26/bus…
The only complex system you should trust is one that breaks all the time, at all scales, and where those breakdowns are routine and the mitigation for it well developed. Never put your data on a server with ten years of uptime
The human response to any functioning complex system is to pile on additional complexity until it breaks catastrophically. So a steady rate of breakdowns, big and small, is the only reassurance that you aren't piling up massive levels of risk somewhere
In today's email, someone who paid a $7.75 one-time fee to use Pinboard in 2010 is threatening me with a class-action lawsuit for asking them, 11 years in, to consider switching to a subscription plan. Supportive emails outnumber angry ones 100:1, but the latter bring me true ha
I also got called settler trash by a Canadian(!) user who told me I am a "white supremacist piece of shit who should return to whatever neo-Nazi-infested gutter I oozed out of", but disguised their email so they could keep using the site, which they like. It's a good site!
For the record, I am not a settler, I've just been putting off going home for 39 years.
The number of sea shanties being sung about GameStop is a larger positive integer than I would have expected in 2019 reddit.com/r/wallstreetbe…
Previously:
The GameStop frenzy feels like a cultural seed crystal for something Gamergate-like, although far less toxic so far than that was. But the deep emotional roots of childhood video games combine with young adults confronting 2021 elite failure in what are clearly fascinating ways.
Clubhouse should merge with Nest and hook into all the thermostat microphones. Instant mass adoption plus killer business model (selling blocks of microphone downtime). It would also allow neat haptic UX touches—as the discussion in a room gets heated, turn up the temperature
Could also create automatic real-time communities linking rooms that are at the same temperature over voice chat. "Turn it down to 59 degrees, I don't want anyone else to hear us"
Google in January: "“We have frozen all NetPAC political contributions while we review and reassess its policies following last week’s deeply troubling events"
Google in February:
I guess the review went well
The "Promoting Our Republican Team PAC" made a $10,000 maximum donation to Trump in 2020, and gave money to two senators and six congressmen who voted to overturn the Presidential election. So I'm kind of curious about the rigors of Google's NetPAC's review process.
We have this debate any time there's a new gravy train for online writing, and it's getting exasperating. Every new platform will reward a set of star writers in a POWER CLAW distribution, the early will cash in, and discovery is the unsolvable problem.
Everybody wants to write. But no one has the time to sift through all the stuff by unknowns, let alone pay for it. There is not going to be a world where ten million writers each make a comfortable living off of a modest 1000-reader paid newsletter. Ask your local indie band.
The way to make a living off writing online will remain the same as ever—try to be an early arrival on whatever new platform is willing to take huge losses to win readership, whether it's Blogger, Medium, Substack, or the next one. Good luck beating the winners from last time!