1. I love that Joe Biden's dog keeps biting people and no one cares. And it actually touches on a big difference between Biden and Obama. cnn.com/2021/03/30/pol…
2. In the 2000s, I used to work in the field of online organizing. Online organizing is just marketing but we used to think it was super special if we said online organizing and progressive movement together. Obama used our marketing tools better than we did.
3. The reason, as it turns out, is because extremely polished brands do great online. Obama had a marvelous brand. But eventually it saddled his administration with a harmful cult of personality he had to maintain.
4. For instance, Obama asked every incoming staffer for crazy amounts of details, like all emails they'd ever written. The WH fired Van Jones out of fear of tarnishing the Obama brand because he once signed a petition he didn't fully read. politico.com/story/2009/09/…
5. Anyway, at a certain point, during the early Obama administration, one of the online organizers I knew, now with a job in the White House, told me there would be an amazing announcement the next day. I would love it.
6. By this time, I had given up on online organizing as useful. I was working on foreclosures and finance. I half-thought, maybe they are going to do something helpful to stop 10M people from losing their homes.
7. It turns out, Obama's family got a new extremely beautiful dog, named Bo or Sunny, I don't remember. That was the announcement. Lots of pictures, activists loved it, I mean who doesn't love an adorable dog? But they made a huge deal out of it.
8. That's what the Obama advisors were thinking about, brand maintenance. A lot of the pseudo-scandals of the Obama years, like the tan suit, were ridiculous, but they were a response to the brand obsession of the President.
9. Biden by contrast doesn't seem to care. He doesn't use Twitter. Biden has an old dog in a new place, it's scared and it bit people. Maybe Biden is bad at branding his dog. Either way, there's no scandal, because Brand Biden isn't important, policy is. cnn.com/2021/03/30/pol…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1. Here's the real lesson from the Suez boat mess. The geniuses running world trade tried to stick a really big boat into a too small yet critical canal. The implications of that reality are scary. mattstoller.substack.com/p/what-we-can-…
2. I love the Suez story because it's so easy to understand None of the idiocy is masked by fancy rhetoric of Ivy credentialled McKinsey bullshit.
3. The reason this disruption to global commerce seems so dumb is because it is. First let's go the ship. It was big. Really big. It weighs 220,000 tons, and is as long as the Empire State Building is high.
Excellent oped by former Arkansas Senator Mark Pryor. Robert Jackson was one of the most important - and lesser known - figures during the New Deal. I wrote several chapters on him in Goliath. nytimes.com/2021/03/29/opi…
Aside from his work on antitrust, Jackson as head of the tax bureau legal office investigated the Andrew Mellon industrial empire, and found Mellon guilty of cheating on his taxes. This was a key part of defeating the oligarchs. nytimes.com/2021/03/29/opi…
Mellon had been the Secretary of the Treasury under Hoover, and also owned a bunch of banks. When England went off the gold standard, Mellon knew early on because of his government position. He shored up his own private banks and used the global bank run to take over rival banks.
1. Here's a little story about how Google's search monopoly kills and harms a lot of people. There's no reason for this, except that economists and Obama era enforcers chose to structure Google to let it do so. Follow along. mattstoller.substack.com/p/how-biden-ca…
2. Last week, @leah_nylen broke one of the biggest political scandals of the decade - the choice by Obama officials to not bring anti-monopoly charges against Google. The story seems like a business story, so people don't get how society-shaking it is. politico.com/news/2021/03/1…
3. We see glimpses. Like Google sending users trying to recover from addiction to sham treatment centers, and making money from ads as it does it. theverge.com/2017/9/7/16257…
This week, the Arizona state Senate will debate a law attacking the monopoly Google and Apple have over app stores. Bizarrely, a few weeks ago, it was the Arizona Democrats - not the GOP - who were making extreme libertarian arguments in service of big tech. I clipped the debate.
It's hard to overstate the extreme nature of these claims. One Democrat objects on grounds that the state has no role intervening among private parties in a market. That logic would invalidate environmental, labor, and civil rights rules!
I am quite frightened by the Chinese government’s actions, but it’s evident that if we are going to use moral authority the US must actually demonstrate we deserve it.
Addressing the Chinese government threat means - in part - pulling back on the legacy of immoral and destructive wars and subversions of democracy our foreign policy establishment loves.
The question isn’t whether the US is morally good. The question is whether the world operates according to US norms or Chinese government norms. Right now a good chunk of the world sees no difference, for legitimate reasons.
The Chinese government is a dangerous and totalitarian force bent on destroying the rule of law and Western democracy. It's heartening that the Biden administration is taking a tough line.
Chinese strategists have rightly identified Wall Street as the achilles heel of the United States, and are exploiting our greed and short-term oriented willingness to do anything for cash. The challenge the CCP presents is not just external.