A 🧵on the Republican approach to killing Dem initiatives.

Rs were caught flat-footed by the Covid recovery bill last month -- it was popular, the insurrection was still on people's minds, they couldn't find an effective attack line, it was a rout. That won't happen again.
Rs are on much firmer ground now, in the face of a big spending bill that's not tied to an immediate crisis. They will run the same play they ran on Obama several times.

Step one is promising that they are open to cooperation. They *want* an infrastructure bill, really!
That then sucks Dems into negotiations, where they will agree to give things up in the name of compromise. That will go on as long as Rs can keep it going -- they will draw it out & draw it out, with cooperation always juuuust over the horizon.
In giving up pieces of their plan, Dems implicitly *concede Republican critiques*. Oh, this really is "too much spending." Oh, this spending really is frivolous. Oh, we really don't need this much money for this particular area. Oh, this really isn't related to infrastructure.
Thus will the headlines go: Republicans attack, Dems retreat. Dems go on record with every critique they concede, every bit of spending they're willing to give up. They will collaborate in sapping the urgency & turning focus away from benefits, to "costs."
After Republicans have succeeded in getting as many concessions as they can, after they've kept "partisan squabbling" in the headlines for weeks/months, after they've made the whole process contentious, ugly, & unpopular ... they will bail. Zero support, zero votes.
This leaves Dems with the worst of all worlds -- an ugly process, a bunch of substantive policy concessions, a bill that now looks like a jalopy ... AND a "party line vote" that signals to the public that they're being rigid & uncompromising.
Make the process ugly, make Dems look weak, & then bail & make Dems look partisan. It's super-shitty, but it works. They ran it on Obama's stimulus; they ran it on his health care plan. And they're going to run it on Biden's investment bills.
Unfortunately, Dems can't just skip the whole empty, pointless process & go straight to passing whatever 50 Dems can pass -- which would at least make them look decisive & keep focus on the bill's benefits -- because Joe Manchin has silly, vain political games to play.
In fact, one reason the bill is vulnerable -- the big tax hikes, which Rs are trumpeting as usual -- is only in there to satisfy Manchin's ridiculous & unfounded deficit hysteria! He made the bill vulnerable to R attacks in the name of "fiscal conservatism"! So f'ing dumb.
Anyway, I'm no Machiavelli, I don't know exactly how Dems can pull this off. They gotta do what they gotta do for Manchin, so he can be fully convinced that Rs won't cooperate. I guess the one thing I'd emphasize is *speed*. Getting bogged down will be the death of this thing.
The key thing to remember is that *only political obsessives care about process*. Rs will fool media into focusing on process obsessively, but voters. don't. care.

W/in a week of passage, all process stories will fade from the news. Only results matter.
Ignore bad-faith R process complaints. Process stories are vapor. Get the money out the door & in front of voters. Show voters actual things changing/happening. That is the political north star & the only path to survival in 2022. </fin>

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Roberts

David Roberts Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @drvolts

1 Apr
All of this. As in the Hayes/McWhorter podcast, whenever anyone tries to question the *scale* & *significance* of this problem in the grand scheme of things, the CC crowd responds with outrageous individual examples. Which, yes, exist! But it isn't responsive to the question.
If we were going to approach "cancel culture" in a *remotely* scientific fashion, we'd have to define it, clarify what counts & doesn't. We'd have to specify what distinguishes leftie racial-justice CC from threats to speech from the right, or from the wealthy/powerful.
And we'd need to develop some empirically credible assessment of the *number* of these cases. How common are they, relative to other threats to speech/freedom?

The fact no CC warrior will answer these Qs (or even address them in good faith) inspires little confidence.
Read 4 tweets
31 Mar
One thing we're starting to see -- expect it to ramp up when Biden's second investment bill is announced -- is the utter contempt that Republican tough guys feel toward the care professions, care workers, & caring generally.
Had a troll in my TL a bit earlier referring to care investments as "forcing him to pay for someone else's babysitter." There's going to be lots more of that. Care isn't *real* work, not *real* infrastructure, not the *real* economy -- just something chicks do.
Getting more women into politics won't solve all problems, but it will certainly reduce the salience of that pathetic, dumbass attitude.
Read 4 tweets
28 Mar
"most people living in the United States today—certainly more than half—are not Americans in any meaningful sense of the term."

Good to see the right dropping all pretense.

americanmind.org/salvo/why-the-…
This is what I was getting at in a tweet a few weeks ago: you either see the US as a set of rules/procedures/principles meant to enable pluralism ... or you see it as a specific white/Christian/patriarchal culture. The right has chosen the latter, more & more openly.
Related: opposition to federal gun control laws is strongly correlated with Christian nationalism, which has been taking over the US right wing. Christian nationalism says the US is God's special country; to be a patriot, one must be Christian. asanet.org/sites/default/…
Read 7 tweets
27 Mar
1. Twitter! I need your advice & counsel.

In a couple months, we're launching a long-delayed home renovation project. Kitchen, office, & living room will be inaccessible for 3-4 months. We're trying to decide what to do with ourselves during that time.
2. One option: rent a furnished Airbnb. Unfortunately, finding one within Seattle that is open to 4 people, 2 dogs, & a cat is both difficult & *expensive*. For 4 months it would probably run us $30-$40K 😳 -- a substantial boost in the cost of the whole project.
3. The other option we're considering: buy an RV & park it in the driveway. Mrs. Volts & I would live in it & cook meals in it. Our bedroom inside would be converted to office/TV room. At the end, we'd just sell the RV. This would be *much* cheaper, albeit more logistical hassle.
Read 4 tweets
26 Mar
So, yeah, I do a lot of Zillow surfing to relax. And some of the design choices of contemporary homes baffle me. This house has something 99% of new houses are missing: a mud room! Who wants to tromp straight from outside into a living room? zillow.com/homes/for_sale…
You need a place to take off your shoes, hang up your coat, and generally get ready to enter the home proper. In the South when I was growing up, *every* house had this. Now when I look at new homes on Zillow, it seems to have vanished entirely. Perplexing.
The other contemporary home design choice that baffles me: enormous master bedrooms. All the new high-end homes have them. Why, though? Do people really need a "sitting area" in their bedroom? Why all the space? You're just there to sleep!
Read 5 tweets
25 Mar
The American front lawn is a symbol of how we've abandoned public space & sought to replicate all its benefits in our small private estates, which turns out to be impossible. volts.wtf/p/a-rant-about…
In this post I call out something I was told by Salvador Rueda, the visionary behind so much of Barcelona's transformation: residences, businesses, & roads can get you *urbanity*, but until you have public spaces -- "the public's living room" -- you don't have a *city*.
It always stuck in my head as a perfect description of a growing portion US land use: urbanity without cities. Highways, chain stores, and suburbs in an endless, undifferentiated smear, with no *center*, no place for community to form & evolve.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!