In advance of tomorrow's official release of my book Paper Trails, today I'm releasing US Post Offices - the underlying spatial-historical dataset that made the book possible. Here's a peek into the data:
US Post Offices contains records for 166,140 post offices that operated in the US between 1639-2000. It is one of the most detailed and expansive datasets available for studying US historical geography on a year-by-year basis.
I'll be posting more in the coming days and weeks about some of the patterns and findings this dataset reveals. But I wanted to start with a thread about how the data was created and where to find it.
Richard W. Helbock, a postal historian and philatelist, published United States Post Offices, an 8-volume series aimed at fellow stamp collectors as “the first attempt to publish a complete listing of all the United States post offices which have ever operated in the nation.”
I discovered Helbock's work in 2013, two years after he passed away. Thankfully, Catherine Clark was still selling her late husband's work online and I was able to purchase a CD-ROM of the data. Without Helbock or Clark, none of this would have been possible 🙏
Helbock completed years and years of archival research to collect data from sources like microfilmed departmental records. Despite never having met him, I wanted to credit this labor. So I have included him posthumously as the co-creator of this dataset.
My part in this was to process Helbock's data and develop a way to geocode these records (locate them on a map). I settled on using the Geographic Names Information System (GNIS) as a historical gazetteer: usgs.gov/core-science-s…
The geocoding process found location coordinates for 2/3 of Helbock's post offices. However, the success rate wasn't evenly distributed. In what could characterize much of American history, results varied from state to state. Ex. 98% of post offices in OR vs. 49% in NC.
A map with 1/3 of its data missing can be misleading. So I also made an alternative version of the dataset that randomly distributed those missing post offices within the surrounding county in which they operated. Here's a comparison of the two versions for CO in 1880:
Even with these limitations, US Post Offices has a lot of advantages. Compared to census data, US Post Offices shows patterns at a sub-county level and for years that don't only end in zero. Ex. Look at the year-by-year shifts in CO in the decade leading up to 1880:
You can also combine US Post Offices with other spatial data, such as a set of shapefiles of Native land cessions and government reservations from @claudiosaunt et. al's invasionofamerica.ehistory.org
Pairing this data casts postal expansion in a different light. In CO, the 1873 Brunot Agreement seized 3.7 million acres of Ute land (light gray on the map), but the US Post's ability to expand into a remote mountainous area helped settlers rapidly occupy this plundered land.
In fact, as I argue in both Paper Trails and the accompanying website gossamernetwork.com, the US Post facilitated a wider process of settler colonial expansion & Indigenous dispossession during the 19th century:
As of today, US Post Offices is now available for anyone to download. First, if you're planning to use it please start by reading the data biography (h/t @datassist): cblevins.github.io/us-post-office…
Second, I decided to use @HarvardDV as the primary archival repository for the dataset itself. This gives it a stable institutional home and permanent DOI for long-term access and citation: doi.org/10.7910/DVN/NU….
Third, @github is still the standard for sharing code. I made a Github repository to share the R code I wrote to process and geocode Helbock's data: github.com/cblevins/us-po…
Finally, US Post Offices made up the analytical backbone of Paper Trails: The US Post and the Making of the American West and its companion website gossamernetwork.com. Order the book today if you want to read more - and use AAFLYG6 to get 30% off! :) global.oup.com/academic/produ…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I've come down with the #unessay bug that's been going around. Symptoms include: renewed end-of-the-semester energy, warm fuzzy feelings of pride for one's students, and an acute desire to proselytize about the assignment.
Here's a thread of some reflections...
Nuts and bolts: 1. The #unessay was part of History of the Western U.S. Students had to compose an analysis of some place in the West and explain its significance for the region's history in any form _other_ than a written essay. (cblevins.github.io/sp18-west/plac…).
2. All students submitted an initial idea for their #unessay and then met with me individually to hammer out how they were going to complete it. They presented their unessay in class and then submitted a final version + accompanying overview + annotated bibliography.