Both Ukraine and Russia speaking as if there's gonna be quite an escalation very soon. Russia warning of war; the US already sabre rattling. Ceasefire already broken (by Kiev) with most considerable clashes since July 2020. ft.com/content/6a3d49…
Ukraine claiming a military build up at border. See a few tweets out there tonight which suggest Russian convoys are about 25km from border.
Ceasefire officially over; no agreement to its continuation. All quiet for now.
"Support" is very vague but the US will at the very least be escalating sanctions and selling more guns to the fascists in Kiev. The escalation could, of course, spiral into broader conflict.
My position, as always, is down with "great power competition"; socialism or extinction!
Just in case any clarity is needed on that
Seen a few people online saying Russia suspended oil exports to Ukraine, which isn't true. A Swiss company which takes Russian oil to Ukraine has suspended doing that and Rosneft has found another company to transport it. mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/id…
It's a weird disinfo line but an important one, as shutting of gas to Ukraine came before the certain escalations at the start of the 2014 war.
So before I log, what I will say is that I think this will represent a very important escalation if it happens, the ramifications of which won't be perceivable for a while. It will be horrible and it will look like the end of the world, especially in the war hungry western press.
I expect it will be contained regionally but there is the possibility that things could really get out of hand here. If this aligns with a serious escalation in the South China Sea (and there are significant rumblings that way too), a much wider conflict may form *fast*.
That can happen over just Ukraine too, depending on how far either the US or Russia push it. The red lines aren't really clear here (to the public) and the Russian deployment is *significant* (as is fashy Kiev's I imagine, but there's no footage of that - "how odd").
More likely imo is a high intensity "great power" conflict like we saw in 2014 and in Armenia last year, which stays within certain (albeit expanded relative to 2014) parameters - "hybrid" "greyzone" "not a war" war stuff, you know the drill if you've followed me for a bit.
That would still represent a significant escalation but it wouldn't lead to a wider European war necessarily. It would mean sanctions and some definite decisions in Europe, particularly on Nord Stream 2. I have opinions on how that will go but we'll deal with that another time.
Finally, this could all be posture leading to a slightly different ceasefire and, more significantly, a signal to Washington to back down on a few things - again,decision time in Europe.
We'll see, but this is gonna be quite the thing if it happens.
P.S. The fanfare around people posturing as anti-imperialists to debate the morals of amateur dramatics on this app needs to stop gaining traction among anyone serious. It's distracting even sincere comrades. Shit is really bad and we're still *nowhere near* ready.
So, the reason we’re not hearing much on Kiev is because Kiev has essentially declared war already, Zelensky setting forth plans to take Crimea and Sevastopol within three months on 24 March. president.gov.ua/documents/1172…
Further stuff in this blog article and corroborating links below
NATO relatively muted for now in comparison to individual nations (Brits, US, Canada).
Ukraine asking for sped up membership to NATO, joint exercises with NATO and political pressure on Russia.
More significant, NATO just gave a nod to the strategy adopted by Kiev this month - that is, the strategy to take Crimea and Sevastopol (link above) president.gov.ua/en/news/zastup…
That nod is easy to miss, so here it is highlighted.
Reports of fighting in Donetsk. Would say its still unclear the extent to which this represents all out escalation, as tit-for-tat hasn't stopped in years.
Ukraine has sent a notification of escalations at the border to the UN. Seen reports of more conflict in Luhansk. Very likely there could be a plunge tomorrow.
British imperialism put out a statement that it will stand with Kiev and the US.
I reiterate: down with great power competition. Socialism or extinction.
Will update tomorrow! That's me for the night comrades
Seems like skirmishes were around Luhansk. Pretty intense but no expansion of conflict zone
Well then. Escalations likely to linger at this level until drills. Big move from NATO here if this is true, just on the "greyzone" (ha!) of a provocation
The obvious plant is intended for an audience that simply will not see the video or photos of him behind the police. The provocation will be distributed through different forms of media. When narratives like that set in, it really doesn't matter about how obvious it was to us.
They move on many terrains ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
You're better off telling your dad and your nan that "Kill the Bill" means you think you should have the right to protest and that masses of young people aren't using archaic slang for police that none of them had ever heard until this week than tweeting that very obvious point
Corbyn and all your faves remained members of the Labour Party through this, and still remain members now, as Labour acquiesces to open capitalist dictatorship. Fuck em.
He’ll asphyxiate this just as he asphyxiated the anti-austerity movement, just as he chose co-operation with the bourgeois state over the proletarian movement at every serious test of his integrity. Letting these people lead, again, points to defeat, again.
Nord Stream 2 reports harrassment from military and civilian ships and vessels as the pipeline nears completion, including an "unidentified submarine". Things are really, really heating up. reuters.com/article/us-nor…
Nord Stream 2 is something which is quite crucial to understanding Ukraine rn I think, as it's a gas pipeline between Russia na d Germany specifically which cuts out gas transit through Ukraine.
Russian ships defending Nord Stream 2 now. This is getting real wild.
Washington sent diplomats to Taiwan for the first time in 42 years and signed an agreement to co-operate with Taiwan’s coast guard to ”counter Beijing” last weekend. This pretty much scuppers the basis of US-China relations. independent.co.uk/asia/china/chi…
Between this and Ukraine, the signals are all pointing to a generalised and considerable escalation.
I doubt this would spiral into all out conflict in either instance immediately but, honestly, that possibility is very much there. We’ve been on this path for a while, the crisis is really starting to *bite* and there’s absolutely no resistance to war.
I don't particularly care about an apology, although I suppose it's noteworthy that this statement doesn't contain one. What's worse is that they again skirt the question of what Peter Singer actually advocates - which is eugenics.
This being missing allows this to proceed as if they've just "upset" disabled people, rather than platforming an advocate of a political philosophy which calls for the annihilation of disabled people. Platforming a eugenicist is not a fucking "mistake".
Like, it's astonishing anyone would need to "reach out to disabled activists" to know that eugenics is a reactionary political position.
I'd also be wary of that "we acknowledge this was good faith" because it's building to a position where they say continued criticism is not.