John H Knox Profile picture
31 Mar, 16 tweets, 11 min read
In recent weeks, the UN has moved closer than ever before to recognizing the human right to a healthy and sustainable environment (R2E). This (lengthy) thread highlights some of the most important developments. 1/16
universal-rights.org/blog/thetimeis…
On Feb 23, @URGthinktank launched a policy report entitled #TheTimeIsNow making the case for global recognition of the R2E, which was co-authored by @SREnvironment David Boyd, @marc_limon and myself. universal-rights.org/urg-policy-rep… 2/
At the report launch, High Commissioner @mbachelet, UNEP head @andersen_inger, @UNICEF head Henrietta Fore, foreign ministers of Fiji, Costa Rica, Maldives & ambassadors of Germany and Switzerland all agreed #TheTimeIsNow to recognize the right. 3/16
During the first, high-level week of this session of the Human Rights Council, others joined them in urging the importance of environmental rights – including the foreign ministers of Italy, Portugal and, perhaps most consequentially, China. 4/16
On March 9, @UNEP delivered a landmark statement on behalf of 15 UN agencies, including @ILO, @UNDP, @UNICEF, @UN_Women, @WHO, @Refugees (UNHCR), @eclac_un, and @UNECE strongly urging global recognition of the R2E. 5/16
unep.org/news-and-stori…
The call of 1100+ civil organizations to the UN “to recognize the right of all to a safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment” was delivered by 28 organizations including @hrw, @Earthjustice, @ciel_tweets, @FranciscansIntl, @amnesty, @fidh_un, @CRINwire, @MinorityRights
Costa Rica, 4 other core group countries, and 65 other States said a "safe, clean, healthy and sustainable environment is integral to the full enjoyment of human rights” and committed to discuss with States and stakeholders recognition of the right. 7/16
In this light, the resolution finally adopted by the Council on March 23 may have seemed a little disappointing. Because of resistance from some States, including the US and UK, it did not refer specifically to the right to a healthy environment. 8/16 ap.ohchr.org/documents/dpag…
The resolution did other important things, however, including renew the mandate of @SREnvironment for three more years and ask him to convene an expert seminar this year on the role of human rights and conservation in the prevention of pandemics. 9/16
David Boyd will identify good practices and press States to do better, including via amicus briefs: “if you do things well you can be highlighted in a good practices report. If you're not fulfilling your obligations, then you can end up in the courtroom”
genevasolutions.news/climate/i-m-no…
The resolution also calls on States to conserve ecosystems and biodiversity by applying “a human rights-based approach", and to consider “measures that respect and protect the rights of those who are particularly vulnerable to the loss of healthy ecosystems and biodiversity.” 11/
This language is particularly important in the run-up to the next @UNBiodiversity COP in China in October, especially in light of the recent @FAO report re-confirming that protection of indigenous rights is key to ensuring effective conservation. theguardian.com/environment/20… 12/16
Still, the Council session may be chiefly remembered for the fact that this is the first time that so many States, UN agencies, and civil society organizations have come together to endorse UN recognition of the right to a healthy environment. 13/16 genevasolutions.news/climate/un-clo…
Even in the US, the Environmental Justice for All Act (introduced on Mar 18) has "the right of all people to clean air, safe and affordable drinking water, protection from climate hazards, and the sustainable preservation of the ... natural environment.”
grist.org/equity/democra…
Movements are also afoot in a number of US. states to amend their state constitutions to include a right to a healthy environment. New York’s proposed amendment will be up for ratification by the general public in November. 15/16 nrdc.org/experts/corinn…
Of course, most countries in the world have already recognized the right to a healthy environment in national constitutions or regional agreements – and many are seeing its benefits.

The UN should do the same. Hopefully, soon, it will.
16/16

bbc.com/future/article…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John H Knox

John H Knox Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JohnHKnox

20 Jan 20
This decision by the Human Rights Committee is important, but the attention-grabbing headline may seem to overstate, and thus obscure, its real significance. So here’s a (lengthy) thread that explains the decision in more detail. 1/20

cnn.com/2020/01/20/wor…
For what it’s worth, the BBC article on the same case describes it more accurately. 2/
bbc.com/news/world-asi…
Some background: the Human Rights Committee is a body of independent experts mandated to oversee compliance with the Int’l Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which has 170+ parties, including the US. 3/20
Read 20 tweets
16 Aug 19
This week, the Human Rights Committee (a treaty body overseeing the Int’l Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) issued Portillo Cáceres v Paraguay, its most important environmental decision yet. In this (lengthy) thread, I describe the case and explain why it’s a big deal. 1/20
The decision is the first one in which a treaty body has so clearly stated that a State’s failure to protect against environmental harm can violate its obligations to protect rights of life and of private/family life. It will be a precedent cited in many subsequent cases. 2/20
In addition to reviewing reports from every country that belongs to the ICCPR, the Committee also hears communications (complaints) from individuals and groups alleging violations by countries that have accepted its jurisdiction, and issues non-binding decisions. 3/20
Read 21 tweets
12 May 19
Torres Strait islanders, with the help of @ClientEarth, are arguing to the UN Human Rights Committee that Australia's failure to address climate change violates their human rights. Here’s why this claim breaks new ground. 1/12 nyti.ms/2vVAuCl
In the article, the islanders, indigenous Australians who live in the strait between Australia and New Guinea, explain how the effects of climate change, especially rising sea levels, are interfering with their human rights to life and culture. 2/12
Ever since the Inuit people in the Arctic first made this type of argument over ten years ago, it has become clearer and clearer that climate disruption prevents the enjoyment of rights to life, health, culture, food, housing, etc. 3/12
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!